Leaderboard

Hello all Well I believe in this case i can interject and put a few of the nonsensical commentaries on this expert (i cannot call him a dealer) to rest. This was my sword (bought from Darcy). I let go of it to Peter only because I felt he truly deserved to have the sword and no other interested party did nearly as much research on the blade before asking me to buy it (i have had offers on this blade people wouldn't believe) . He literally travelled to my location, took his initiative to see the sword in hand, he didn't make a commitment on the spot but after seeing the sword, thought many weeks about it before making the purchase. He came prepared with evidence and research from multiple sources and the amount of work that went into that would earn even the respect of people like @Rivkin and @Jacques who i think wouldn't have known where to start, indeed i was completely taken back by his dedication. And no, i dont need the money, i needed it to go to the right person. The sword itself, it's beauty cannot be appreciated except in hand. The hataraki will keep the owner amazed for years with new discoveries constantly. The sugata is powerful and has a presence that could easily make this a one sword collection. There are less than 10 Yukimitsu with Kinzogan and only one with Kinzogan to the swords owner, that is this one. I believe this sword has all the elements you want in early Soshu, the jigane is a mix of Shintogo and Yukimitsu experimental flare done with pure elegance and the Hamon is like what we see Masamune doing in cases. Everyone going on here about someone they've never met or dealt with needs to appreciate that this gentleman had the right eye when he requested me to relinquish the sword to him and that was in a room with about another 30 juyo and TJuyo, he went for this and that says everything. He's an excellent student, teacher and researcher so I suggest you stick to what he is selling not how or why.

If you do not believe what you have been told then contact the NBTHK in Japan. The leading authority on Japanese Sword authentication. Send them some images…..they will enjoy a good laugh. This is utter nonsense and an elaborate fake.

Don't understand why some people comparing different time epoch and argue which is the best. Personally i think in every time epoch, there are made wonderful blades.

I suggest you research Heian swords. You will see there is not a single remote resemblance to this thing. You don't even have to ask us, just look at how they were made, what they looked like. What the fittings looked like...consistently. We don't need to tell you any of this. You can see it for yourself. You won't find a single sword in the evolution of Nihonto even close to this. Not one thing. You have some of the world's experts here on the forum. Which you seem to be ignoring. You have people here involved in the society you are talking about. You have authors here, museum curators, very high end collections. People who visit Japan multiple times a year to study Japanese swords. Not a single one will give even one tiny vouch for this. Or even contact you privately to find out anything. The NBTHK won't respond. This will be a joke to them.

Just my opinion, but I suspect this entire inquiry was based on ulterior motives, its just too peculiar. Time will tell of course, but I would hazard a guess this item will be seen listed for sale at some point sooner than later.

Afraid there is not one single thing here that bears any relation to a Japanese sword even remotely. It is so far out of real as to be comical. Nothing intended as criticism, but they are insane if they came to that conclusion and I would question their testing methods or even their basic knowledge. It does not have even the slightest chance of being anything real. I don't even see anything Chinese archaic there.

I admit that Japanese experts have incredible skill in determing authencity and details. However I must say that sometimes I prefer neutrality against extremely specific while still theoretical opinions. I know foremost experts put non dated items (sometimes even mumei items) to a specific point in smiths career based on some tiny details on worksmanship or tiny variations in mei etc. I tend to favor more neutral uncertainity. Of course that is not nearly as exciting. Sōshū is not really my thing. I start to like them only from Sadamune attributed items onwards and I think Hiromitsu might be my favorite Sōshū smith. This year in Japan I saw Aizu Shintōgo (National Treasure), TJ Kunimitsu tantō, and a Jūyō Kunimitsu tantō. Granted these were all in museums through the glass but all I remember is the very fine worksmanship, as these items do not interest me that much. However one thing I have come to realize when travelling in various places in Japan is that memory is a fickle thing. And to be honest I have always thought I have decent memory especially when it comes to swords. This brings me to another point, how long has passed between the evaluation of the swords by the expert. I am not trying to put down experts in any case, they do have incredible knowledge and pretty much all our current information is based on several generations of Japanese experts. Still I think even the Japanese experts will rarely get to study the most important items side by side as they are owned by various, Museums, Shrines, Individuals etc. I saw some absolutely incredible stuff in various places in Japan this summer but I realized it is way too difficult for me to accurately judge swords against each other if I saw them in different museums on different days, not even considering about comparing to items I saw last year for example. Even if an item would be bit out of norm, if after polish it would exhibit very fine worksmanhip after the polish, then I would think there is a great chance it would be seen as a legitimate item. As I am at home in a fever, I did this just for fun. Here are the Kunimitsu kanji for 11 dated Shintōgo Kunimitsu tantō. And I did scramble the mei so they are not in any ascending or descending dates.

Sorry RR, but John is absolutely correct. The spelling mistakes and assertions on the "Certificate" are laughable.

Anyone with a passing knowledge of real Japanese swords could tell you this is a very poor fake in a matter of seconds.

Unfortunately this is an absolutely appalling fake, the certificates are complete nonsense and worthless. Seek an immediate refund. https://www.jssus.org/nkp/fake_japanese_swords.html

Hello all, This is my first nihonto, which I got from one of the recommended dealers here on NMB. I chose this one because it was one within my small budget and was in good enough polish to be able to see some of the activity in the blade. I am quite happy with it. I've been studying it trying to learn as much about it as I can; age, school and province, etc, but feel like I have kind of hit a wall due to the limited number of swords I've been able to handle. So I wanted to put it out here as a kantei exercise for anyone who wants to take a look at it. Most of what Ive learned about this is from Nakayama's book. Here are the specifications of the blade as best I could figure them out. If it's possible to tell from the photos if I got these right. I was a little stumped on differentiating activities in the blade (ie nie v. nioi) so these are my best guess. nagasa 66.2 cm sori 1 cm kasana 0.7 cm mihaba 2.8 cm kissaki 3.2 cm shinogi-zukuri chu-kissaki, or maybe ko-kissaki iori-mune low shinogi standard nakago (ubu) ha agari kurijiri kiri yasurime o-mokune hada nioi-deki hamon- hiro suguha boshi- komaru Mumei To me it looks to have the typical shallow kanbun shinto sugata, and I think the condition of the nakago points to a similar age. It’s been polished a few times, the hamachi is all but gone. i think it had an interisting life, there is one decent kirikomi on the mune. The seller said that it might be from the shitahara school, and as far as I can tell that seems possible, but I have a hard time differentiating from some other schools that seem to have similar characteristics. I am looking forward to seeing what you all make of it. Edward

Type: Katana Ubu, Suriage or O-Suriage : O-suriage Mei : (Mumei, Signature) : Mumei Papered or not and by whom? : NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon Era/Age : Late Nanbokucho Shirasaya, Koshirae or Bare Blade? : Shirasaya with Kanzan sayagaki, two piece gold plated habaki Nagasa/Blade Length : 66.6 cm Sori : 1.3 cm Hamon Type : Notare midare Jihada : Itame and masame Other Hataraki Visible : Ashi, inazuma, and tobiyaki. Flaws : None Sword Location : USA Will ship to : I am open to options but shipping will need to be covered. Payment Methods Accepted : PP, venmo, wire transfer. Price and Currency : SOLD Other Info and Full Description : Hello, I am offering an early Mino katana with NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon (TH) papers that attributed it to Kanenobu. Here are two possibilities listed in Marcus Sesko’s Swordsmith Index: KANENOBU (兼延), Ōan (応安, 1368-1375), Mino –“Kanenobu” (兼延), Naoe-Shizu school, student of Kaneuji(兼氏), according to tradition the younger brother of Kanetoshi (兼俊) KANENOBU (兼延), Meitoku (明徳, 1390-1394), Mino –“Kanenobu” (兼延), Naoe-Shizu school The sword has an old well preserved shirasaya with a Kanzan sayagaki attributing the work to the Naoe Shizu school but not a particular smith. The blade is o-suriage mumie. The sugata is powerful with a tori-sori given the wide base (motohaba) of 3.3 cm balanced by a narrow spine (kasane) of 0.6 cm that slightly tapers up to a 2.18 cm sakihaba and an elegant chu-kissaki. The ji has a bright appearance with itame and masame jigane and some mokume. Cheki and ji-nei are plentiful with sections of rolling black nei sake. The hamon is a rugged notare midare pattern that is shallow in sections, characteristic of older Mino swords, with deep nioibuchi. Hataraki include ashi and inazuma with boiling nei sections. Long thin stretches of tobiyaki run near the first 5-6 inches of the blade’s ura side. The boshi is a bright, shallow, ko-maru with a small gunome accent near the yokote on both sides. https://photos.app.goo.gl/tNDeSYJmyzmxGK9N7

It gets better and better. I haven’t smiled so much for this long in a while. PLEASE do tell us what the NBTHK say….we are holding our breath!

here we go again

The certificate is Chinese.

I suspect both certificates are completely fake, and had nothing to do with either organization. In fact, neither template exists for either of these organizations, and the wording is just bizarre. Plus all the Japanese fonts mixed in with English. High level fakery here.

Hi all, for your enjoyment, this was the first of my recent gunto aquisitions. Nice set of all numbered seppa and tsuba, some great big nobbly same. Lovely choji hamon. Great condition iron saya. Mei is Hoshu Takada Taira Sadamori with a buddhist bonji above.

https://www.touken.or.jp or european branch https://nbthk.eu

Thus the chart now has "RA" in '41, but with a footnote: (note: Pasting the chart on the NMB site causes spacing distortion) 1941 WA ワ KA カ YO ヨ TA タ RE レ SO ソ TSU ツ NE ネ NA ナ WA 6 -S WA 134S WA 158S WA 175S WA 231S WA 238S WA 638S KA 89-S KA 228-S KA 232-S KA 236-S KA 238-S KA 275-S KA 353-S KA 405-S KA 458-S YO 11 YO 57-S YO 122-S YO 150-S YO 162-S YO 234 YO 320-S YO 349-S YO 350-S YO 352-S TA 24-S TA 68-S TA 127-S TA 181-S TA 287-S TA 298-S TA 277-S TA 305-S TA 313-S TA 336-S RE 6-S RE 71-S RE 153-S RE 193-S RE 347-S RE 413-S RE 409-S RE 476-S RE 524-S SO 25-S SO 66-S SO 185-S SO 216-S SO 219-S SO 231-S SO 257-S SO 308-S SO 453-S SO 482-S SO 564-S SO 574-S SO 620-S SO 630-S SO 718-S Tsu 29-S Tsu 95-S Tsu556-S Tsu 198S Tsu 254S Tsu 438S Tsu 573S Tsu 575S Tso 601S Tsu 651S NE 2-S NE 26-S NE 144-S NE 347-S NE 384-S NE 396-S NE 401-S NE 414-S NA 5-S NA 124-S NA 106-S NA 184-S NA 232-S NA 354-S NA 377-S NA 379-S Na 383-S NA 484-S NA 573-S NA 574-S NA 716-S RA 222-S# ? 218 ? 283 ?xxx Filed off.Bohi 1942 RAラ MUム U ウ WIヰ NOノ O オ* KUク YAヤ MAマ RA 7(?)-S RA 100-S RA 341-S RA 495-S RA 768-S RA 820-S RA 823-S RA 858-S RA 934-S RA 984-S RA1027S RA1030S RA1071S RA1162S RA1196S RA1232S RA1256S RA1333S RA1356S Mu 87-S Mu 89-S Mu213-S Mu528-S Mu555-S Mu595-S Mu637-S Mu705-S U 20-S U 70-S U 99-S U 255-S U 357-S U 414-S U 481-S U 592-S U 703-S U 704-S U 1593-S NO 34-S NO 273-S NO 302-S NO 430-S NO 474-S NO 493-S NO 533-S NO 730-A Ku 33-A Ku 101-A Ku 327-A Ku 452-A Ku 466-A Ku 471-A Ku 560-A Ku 878-A Ku 897-A Ku 947-A Ku1020A Ku1087A Ku1200A Ku1226A Ku1327A YA 72-A YA 79-A YA 201-A YA 246-W YA 350-A YA 353-A YA 417-A YA 475-A YA 505-A YA 608-A YA 622-A YA 623-A YA 677-A YA 702-A YA 710-A YA 736-A YA 957-A YA1048-A Ma 77-A Ma 78-A ? 26-S ? 345-S ? 483-S ? 529-S ? 744-S ノ???-A

I had it framed. I'd like to keep the oshigata.

Last October I posted a thread about a Kamakura era tantō I found in Japan, signed Kunimitsu and dated 1308. The deal fell through at that time but in the interim months I kept thinking about it. Spurred on by the dealer stating he planned to have the Mei removed and blade polished before resubmitting to the NBTHK, I decided to redouble my efforts to acquire it. I just couldn’t let that fate befall it, especially as the NBTHK issued Horyu papers in 2018, so I found a way to complete the transaction and it's now in the possession of an intermediate. Fortunately the dealer hadn’t started the work. It was thanks to an investment in Markus’ Kotozen-HC that really spurred on my attention on this blade. I have no idea how this project will pan out but I think I’ve done enough groundwork to at least give it a chance. Here’s my story and a request for assistance. The Hunt Years ago while I was scouring the websites of Japanese retailers I came across a fairly obscure dealer. He has quite a large inventory but mostly lower to mid quality pieces often in poor state of preservation. Buried deep in tantō section was a blade that caught my attention. I made a mental note to revisit the listing later but forgot about it after a redundancy in 2021 and relocation to a different Continent. Then back in October last year I stumbled on the retailers webpage again and to my surprise the tantō was still listed. I should add this was also a consignment piece which the owner had inherited from his deceased father. The son was not a collector nor familiar with the swordsmith. In 2018 the dealer submitted the blade to the NBTHK but they couldn't come to a consensus and returned it with Horyu papers, and a request that further work was needed to authenticate the Mei. 2018/2019 Juyo Shinsa were a couple of those strange years at the NBTHK and I wonder if this contributed to the result for this blade. The dealer was unable to find the evidence that would advance its progress through Shinsa, so the blade remained in the shops inventory almost forgotten, and pushed further down the page. Horyu papers are quite unusual as the NBTHK gets no monetary return when these are issued. The good news though is that getting Horyu is not terminal, in that the Shinsa committee is not saying its gimei, just that there are differences to the usual Kunimitsu nijimei, to warrant additional research. Kunimitsu’s style of Mei is very unique and from what I can tell, consistent throughout his career. The Inconsistency The main 'problem' is the Kuni kanji. Instead of a vertical central line it's curved left to right although the reversal of the mirrored S and 3 parallel lines is consistent. How can this be explained? Fortunately this blade is dated 1308. At this stage the historical texts say Kunimitsu was at the end of his career and is believed to have died around 1312/13. His successor was his 2nd son Kunihiro. It was common practice for smiths of the period, at this stage of their careers, to focus on forging and give the honour of carving of horimono and signing the nakago (daimei) to the best apprentice, or in this case, the defacto successor, Kunihiro. As an aside Yukimitsu was likely the best candidate to take over the forge but he was not blood related and therefore ineligible. Markus states in his Swordsmiths list that all Kunimitsu's sons signed Kunimitsu after his death and that examples of daisaku exist. I have scoured the web looking for examples of Kunihiro's style when signing Kunimitsu and indeed have found several that slant in the normal way. There is no chronology for these signatures so his signing style around 1308 is unconfirmed. Kunihiro as well as Kunishige signed Kunimitsu in a couple of different ways, from 1317 on. Daimei-daisaku was not uncommon during this time and Darcy wrote an excellent essay comparing the 6 styles of signature for the early Rai school smiths. https://onihonto.com/archived-nihonto-ca-yuhindo-com-rai-kunitoshi/ There is a suggestion that the Midare-Kunimitsu, his only extant blade in the Soshu style, was in fact forged by Yukimitsu One of the main points I get from the article is that when an apprentice signed daimei the aim was not to precisely emulate the masters signature style, but to introduce slight variances to differentiate the author of the Mei. In this case Kunihiro added a normal slanted centre line in contrast to the master’s atypical vertical line, but maintained the unusual style of the mirrored S to the left and used a more standard style on the mitsu kanji, without the turn back stroke. The dealmaker If this was all I had to gone on I might have passed on the blade, but I fortuitously invested in Markus' kotozen publication and on pages 456-458 is what is best described as a dead ringer for my blade. The nagasa is almost identical, as is the motohaba, the style and positioning of the boshi is likewise similar. Shape of the nakago is the biggest difference but is consistent with other blades like the Aizu Kunimitsu. Another interesting feature is the characteristic Kunimitsu single sided Koshi-bi. Both blades have an almost identical Koshi-bi on the omote. I have measured the carvings using the munemachi as a reference point and they are almost identical in length. Fortunately the tantō in the book is also signed and dated by the Master himself, but 2 years earlier in 1306. Dated Kunimitsu blades are extremely rare and I only know of 4 including the one I found. It's conceivable that Kunihiro was designated heir-apparent within those 2 intervening years. A couple of blades are dated to the early 1320’s so likely Kunihiro signed Kunimitsu Mei as head of the workshop. One in particular has similar Shintogo jiba, is a shorter length so more characteristic of the father and shows yakikomi (perhaps a carryover blade from before Shintogo died?) What little of the hada that can be seen through the layers of oxidation look promising and that by itself makes it worth going through the various steps. It also has another kantei feature for Kunimitsu namely Yakikomi (absent in the 1306 blade and sometime only on one side) and is considered a sign of superior heat treatment executed by a Mastersmith, with the hardening extending into the nakago. This is something that Shintōgo Kunimitsu excelled at. It also has mitsumune another feature of early Soshuden and seemingly omnipresent on Shintōgo Kunimitsu tantō. Some style of Kuni kanji carved by Kunimitsu's apprentices/heirs A little more digging and I found a short video of the tantō from 1306, taken during an exhibition at the NBTHK last year: https://www.facebook.com/reel/416844547828291 Whats next and a request First thing I want to do is have Tanobe take a look at get his impressions, probably after a window has been opened. Then with a fresh, sympathetic polish I will have the blade resubmitted to the NBTHK. I have exhausted my references and online searches of styles of Kunimitsu Mei, but would be better to find more examples of daimei, daisaku Kunimitsu as mentioned by Markus. If anyone has examples shown in other references that would add support for a daimei attribution I would love to see them. All this information will be passed along for the Shinsa Committee to review to help them come to an informed conclusion. Is there any other supporting evidence I may have overlooked that would bolster the resubmission? Ultimately I think the quality of the jiba has to meet Shintogo Kunimitsu standard for it to be accepted. Did the 1306 blade appear after 2018? Any idea when it passed Shinsa and what papers it got? Goal I’m realistic that the tantō is not in the best shape having been subjected to many polishes over the years. But I will choose the most appropriate togishi to preserve what is left. My main goal is to have the blade attributed to Kunimitsu with daimei signature. If confirmed then this blade has important historical significance. It needs a tsuka, shirasaya and Tanobe sayagaki. There is also a page from an old book stuck to the saya which I would like to have translated. It mentions Masamune, Norishige and Kunimitsu but I’m unsure if there is a specific reference to this particular blade. The sun/moon habaki seems quite unusual too I'm looking forward to seeing where this leads and hope my gut feeling about this blade is justified. If anyone can provide any additional references I would be very grateful.

Dear NMB, I am offering this Nio Kiyoharu katana for sale with NBTHK papers. Katana Nio Kiyoharu, Dated August, 2nd Year of Tenshō (1574) Blade Length: 71.5 cm (approx. 2 shaku 3 sun 6 bu minus) Curvature (Sori): 1.8 cm Width at Base (Moto-haba): 3.20 cm Width at Tip (Saki-haba): 1.90 cm Thickness at Base (Moto-kasane): 0.75 cm Thickness at Tip (Saki-kasane): 0.48 cm Mekugi-ana (peg holes): 1 Description: Shinogi-zukuri, with a high shinogi and low iori-mune. It has a medium-length kissaki. The kitae is nicely formed ko-itame mixed with itame and some masame hada, with strong flowing patterns in places and a clearly visible jigane. The hamon (temper line) is suguha-chō, with small nie and some nice hataraki. The boshi has a slight notare style and is covered with nie. The nakago is ubu. It comes with a large copper habaki plated with gold. Has a shirasaya and a sword bag. SOLD Free shipping inside EU Shipping outside EU available for a small additional cost (€20–40) Shipped with UPS Express (or different courier), fully insured to full value Located in the Netherlands – pickup possible Any questions are always welcome! There will be a donation made to NMB if the blade is sold through NMB.

Little SALE: Buy 2, take 10% off. Buy 3, take 15% off. Shipping and Customs per your Instructions. (1) Ko-kinko paulownia f/k: $375 (Good set. Better than photos.) (2) Umetada Duck tsuba: $250 (Confuscian Happiness theme.) (3) Kanayama Birds tsuba: $250 (Old illegible writing on back.) --If interested, PM me. -Curran [Chris]

Yeah I edited my answer with pointing great info there close up of jigane would be more helpfull. Your sword isnt in shape indicating that more details would appear after repolish. Oh and look on mei examples some have kokuin [hot stamp]

Oh, my face hurts from prolonged smiling. This wasn't an April Fools Day joke, was it? We've had a few, like the Cajun and his National Treasure Beaver Cleaver of a tachi.

This is internet gold....golden eel.

And OP is very much a troll.

You realize that Japanese swords have NEVER been made by layering? Never in the history of Japanese swords were there ever layers....never mind the fact that you can never, ever, work out how many times a sword was folded. That ONE single comment proves this is fake. Layering is a fake idea that people who know nothing about Nihonto use as a term because they do not know how these swords are made. The folding is used to remove impurities, and the steel is worked to remove these and incorporate the metal. You don't get layers, especially ones that can be measured. Hada is very, very different to layering. Oxford certainly does age tests, for their own research. They do not, and never have...done it for external items and then issue certificates. Call them yourself. Your certificates are fake, your item is fake. And there never was...ever....any "golden eel" Does not exist, never did. It's a term used for one of the life stages of a current (very much thriving) eel life stage. At this point someone needs to tell you to wake up!

It's very clearly a fake Japanese sword, and there's absolutely no doubt in my mind. The fact that it's been disputed for ~10 years would imply that someone is not trying very hard. Here is a helpful link to spot fakes in the future: https://www.jssus.org/nkp/fake_japanese_swords.html I am in no way trying to be rude, although I can see how it might seem that way. The fact is, it does not require an expert to tell a pigeon from a falcon. -Sam

Dear members, it is already July, so I would like to remind you of my TSUBA Forging Workshop. At this moment, I have still 2 workplaces left so in case you are interested, please sign up. This workshop is for NMB members only, so it might be a good opportunity to get into contact with others of our board. TSUBA forging workshop 2025.pdf

Brian, It has been too long since I pulled this set out. I have two of the English translation volumes, and thought I had two complete sets. I will revise what I have listed to show I have only the English explanations volume for sale. Thank you very much for your helpful input, which has perhaps saved me from foolishly splitting up my set!

Hi Bob, Sorry havent checked back for awhile. Ive changed my opinion after a second look and I was mistaken on one seppa having an edging added. It appears its the pressure put on the seppa by the tsuka that makes it appear as an add on. Ill draw up from your specs- transfer inches to mm and send you sketch. Will need more specs later! Cheers Mike.

SUGATA and NAKAGO condition point to KANBUN era in my opinion.

Delete what i said if comes across as disrespectful, no probs Something Brano said touched a nerve, there are dealers willing to rip folks off on a daily basis, just wanted make that clear. Its not a rarity. Again, it had nothing do with the firm mentioned at the start. Jacques is right, blades ideally should be seen in hand, but that's not always possible, for many reasons.

Not wanting to further stray off topic here, but regarding dealers and Jacques' "mantra," it's not always possible to see a sword in hand. In places with no shows or local dealers, the internet is the only place for many to see and purchase swords. But Jacques is correct that a photo is often not enough. So, please be sure that when you buy online you have a minimum three-day inspection period to make sure that what you saw is what you got, and that it is what you wanted. If you don't you should be able to get a full refund, minus the postage to get the piece back. Most reputable dealers will do this. Yahoo and Ebay auction site holders as a general rule do not. So, as in all things, caveat emptor!

This was a seminal book Jan. Hoping the new one can come to fruition!

Kaga, late Edo. Is the dou tetsu or nerigawa?

Hi all, hoping more knowledgable folk can cast light on the concept behind the design/ motif on this tsuba? Seems like fish- were gold guilded/ mercury maybe- and gilded/ overlay of ivy? Not sure what to make of it? Seems good work but! Cheers Mike

It's good that certain egregious activities are being discussed. Removing Mei just to pass Shinsa is a crime against history. https://markussesko.com/2016/06/26/the-pitfalls-of-removing-signatures/

Hello Lewis! Wonderful post, thank you for sharing it and best of luck! The video of the Kunimitsu you shared is mine, so I am happy to say I have additional photos, attached here and in subsequent messages.

@Peter D is one of our members, and also has dealer status here and his own dealer section. Being approachable like that, and the fact that dealers don't get listed here or last long if they are not reputable, tells you a lot. Good to check on any dealer you are considering purchasing from. A listing here is always a good sign.

I get it, Though if folks pay god knows how many thousands for swords, then £300 is peanuts on top (insured with dealer) Low value swords, then definitely no. Though that's just my point of view.

Don't forget the RJT and private-made gendaito of the Showa era 1926-1945. These are the last in the 1000 year history of traditionally made nihonto to be made specifically for use on the battlefield. That's why I collect them...they are the most relevant to my parents generation and to my own. Regards...

Picked up a sword for fairly cheap with a signed Tsuba and Nakago. Was listed as a navy sword but isn't. weirdly has a military menuki but an older tsuba and unsure on the mounts, laquered ray skin saya. it's signed Teruhide and is an Ishido Teruhide blade, the sword itself is very appealing and in good polish, very good quality Gendaito which was surprising for the price. https://www.japaneseswordindex.com/teruhide.htm Unusual mounts, has two Ura-Manji (swastika) on the Fuchi, originally before i picked up the sword and looked at the Mei i was trying to work out why it would have an Ura-Manji. Now knowing who the smith is and the era, I'm more intrigued. The Nakago has two Mekugi-Ana so has been remounted in it's short life.

I also agree Kanbun/Shinto.

Nakago was cleaned recently, i.e. the rust inside characters is actually quite old. I am 80% for the signature being authentic. Probably 1670-1730, might be a lesser known generation in 1700s, it is often the case as sword market collapsed completely 1705-1710. Not a typical style for the school, but one of Edo period's attempts at something Rai-ish.

Possibly Kanbun Shinto. Grey

Tsuba /guard sword is not correct and might lead to wrong assumptions of the customs what it might be. TSUBA/sword guard or TSUBA/hand-guard would be another thing in my opinion. And of course the customs tariff numbers of these items are very helpful in identifying the contents of a parcel from Japan.

While there is no record on why the umegane were removed, I was able to narrow down the time frame between 1907 (when the fotos WITH them were taken for the Bulletin) and a record shot taken in 1922 where there were already gone. The museum had several Japanese consultants coming over once in a while around that time period, so I can guess it was maybe done on their recommendation. But, its a mystery...