vajo Posted March 8, 2023 Report Posted March 8, 2023 John i thought Kirikomi are only possible in the mune. Kirikomi "cut" is working because the harder cutting edge cuts into the weaker mune. But this looks like a cut into the very hard cuttings edge? And is it a kirikomi or a fatal flaw because it is going through the temper. Quote
Dave R Posted March 8, 2023 Report Posted March 8, 2023 On 2/19/2023 at 8:30 PM, FrenchBreadPrime said: It's surprising how many blades have been damaged by bullets during WW2, it makes me wonder, are there any pictures of older blades damaged by Teppo ? WWII = full auto on the battlefield, lots of bullets, lots of hits. Quote
Lewis B Posted June 10, 2024 Report Posted June 10, 2024 On 10/31/2021 at 3:57 PM, TomBell said: A sword I recently acquired has damage to the ha, muni and ji. Most of the damage is from the middle of the blade increasing out to the kissaki. Of these, a straight cut in the ji with a very steep V cross section is the most intriguing. I don't think this is the result of bushwhacking. The maximum depth were it terminates at the shinogi is ~0.3 mm. It's maximum width at the shinogi is ~0.4 mm. It's length is 6 mm. A distinctive splatter pattern of fine rust on both sides of the blade radiates from the ji. As a complete beginner, I am trying to learn the names of the sword elements so please forgive me if I have mislabeled anything. I inspected a sword at the recent Japan Art Expo with a very similar indentation described as kirikomi, and in a similar part of the blade, about halfway along. It was over a cm in length with quite a jagged appearance Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted December 7, 2025 Report Posted December 7, 2025 From Japan: https://auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/u1209946393 2 1 Quote
Lareon Posted December 7, 2025 Report Posted December 7, 2025 It's in Japan at the moment so don't have it at hand tot take better photos but one of my blades has a couple of kirikomi. It's being polished at the moment but i wanted to them to leave it in as part of its story 3 Quote
eternal_newbie Posted December 7, 2025 Report Posted December 7, 2025 3 minutes ago, Lareon said: It's being polished at the moment but i wanted to them to leave it in as part of its story This is the usual practice; kirikomi generally aren't seen as flaws but rather badges of honour. Check out the chunks missing out of the mune of the Ishida Masamune on Markus Sesko's article (scroll down for a picture you can enlarge): https://japaneseswordlegends.wordpress.com/2015/09/30/ishida-mitsunari-and-two-masamune-less/ Quote
Scogg Posted December 14, 2025 Report Posted December 14, 2025 While I don’t have a time machine, and cannot confirm with certainty that these marks are battle damage. I suspect that at least one of them is kirikomi. At the very least, it is fun to think about. O-suriage mumei katana. -Sam 4 Quote
John C Posted December 14, 2025 Report Posted December 14, 2025 Ouch. Through the fingers, tsuka, then into the nakago. Unless that is some sort of test cut for a different blade. John C. 1 Quote
eternal_newbie Posted December 14, 2025 Report Posted December 14, 2025 33 minutes ago, John C said: Unless that is some sort of test cut for a different blade. That, or it's an O-O-O-suriage blade that used to be a massive nodachi, and that was part of the mune earlier in its life. Quote
Lewis B Posted December 14, 2025 Report Posted December 14, 2025 39 minutes ago, eternal_newbie said: That, or it's an O-O-O-suriage blade that used to be a massive nodachi, and that was part of the mune earlier in its life. It's on the Ha side of the nakago. Given the angle of the strike it could have been struck while in its saya and being worn. Either way not a good day for its owner. 2 Quote
RichardP Posted December 15, 2025 Report Posted December 15, 2025 Similar to Sam’s, but the kirikomi(?) is along the nakago-mune of a ko-Fujishima tachi: 5 Quote
BjornLundin Posted December 15, 2025 Report Posted December 15, 2025 Not as impressive as other blades, but it has at least three battle marks on the mune, a remarkable old warrior, and only if the blade could talk 2 Quote
Matsunoki Posted December 15, 2025 Report Posted December 15, 2025 Really sorry, I know it’s not a sword but I couldn’t resist….I bet that gave him a headache…… 3 1 2 Quote
nihonto_1 Posted May 24 Report Posted May 24 (edited) Hi, Here are some nice kirikomi on a wakizashi. Including a cut to the end of the saya. Will Edited May 24 by nihonto_1 Quote
NotANinja Posted Wednesday at 07:56 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 07:56 PM Here are some kirikomi on a naginata naoshi I have hoping to get it polished one day and maybe try and keep them if they can be saved, interesting history! Quote
ROKUJURO Posted Wednesday at 08:40 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 08:40 PM That does not look like KIRIKOMI in my opinion. Probably silly boys playing SAMURAI or King Arthur with it after WWII. Quote
NotANinja Posted Wednesday at 08:57 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 08:57 PM 14 minutes ago, ROKUJURO said: That does not look like KIRIKOMI in my opinion. Probably silly boys playing SAMURAI or King Arthur with it after WWII. Oh I fully accept that it could just be that, but as we have no way of truly knowing I kind of want to believe it's kirikomi Quote
Brian Posted Thursday at 07:04 AM Report Posted Thursday at 07:04 AM I expect 99% of this sort of damage is neglect and messing around, and done in modern times. Blade to blade contact is rare and unlikely from those pics. We tend to romanticize these things, but it's important to realize that it isn't a desired thing in most cases and unless can be proven 100%, it's best to not see them as a feature. 6 Quote
John C Posted Thursday at 08:38 PM Report Posted Thursday at 08:38 PM Rob: I guess you could just define their characteristics: dark, so not recent; triangular shaped, so struck with or against sharp metal object; and located along the shinogi. But other than that, it's anyones guess. John C. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.