Ed

Large Iron Rain Dragon Tsuba 3.47" x 3.28" Outstanding iron example of a rain dragon, the mimi is carved as a rope. The Kogai ana he been filled with a shakudo plug. $2000 plus S/H and any associated fees such as Paypal fees, Wire fees, etc. Sale is final. All photos and information regarding this sword are included here. If you are interested in owning this tsuba, contact me via email only: yakiba.com@gmail.com

SADATSUGU, BISHU JU NTHK PAPERS CHU SAKU OWARI DAITO (Katana) SUGATA: SZ MEI: BUSHU JU SADATSUGU DATE: NONE c. GENROKU 1688-1704 NAGASA: 69.22cm (27.25") OVERALL: 88.9cm (35") MIHABA: (1.25") KASANE: 0.63cm (0.25") SORI: 0.5 NAKAGO: UBU MEKUGI ANA: ONE YASURIME: KESHO / SUJIKAI MUNE: IORI HADA: ITAME HAMON: SUGUHA BOSHI: KOMARU HORIMONO OMOTE: NONE HORIMONO URA: NONE HABAKI: 1 PC. GOLD FOIL SHIRASAYA ___________ SADATSUGU, BISHU JU NTHK PAPERS CHU SAKU OWARI SHOTO (Wakizashi) SUGATA: SZ MEI: BISHU JU SADATSUGU DATE: NONE c. GENROKU 1688-1704 NAGASA: 42.86cm (16.875") OVERALL: 56.83cm (22.375") MIHABA: (1.125") KASANE: 0.63cm (0.25") SORI: 0.5” NAKAGO: UBU MEKUGI ANA: ONE YASURIME: SUJIKAI MUNE: IORI HADA: ITAME HAMON: O-CHOJI MIDARE BOSHI: KOMARU / HAKIKAKE HORIMONO OMOTE: NONE HORIMONO URA: NONE HABAKI: 1 PC. GOLD FOIL SHIRASAYA REFERENCES: Hawley’s pg. 668, SAD 763 Sesko’s, Swordsmiths A-Z pg. 901 Courtesy of Sesko’s, Swordsmiths A-Z SADATSUGU (貞次), Genroku (元禄, 1688-1704), Owari –“Bishū-jū Sadatsugu” (尾州住貞次), “Kawachi no Kami Fujiwara Sadatsugu” (河内守藤原貞次), first name Kyū ́emon (久右衛門), student of Sadayuki (貞幸), ko-mokume, chōji- midare, chū-saku. You may prefer to call this a "pair" of swords. There are differing opinions on this as with most things in this hobby. Many feel if the koshirae are not matching they are not a daisho, or if the swords were not made together as a "daisho" then they are not a "true" daisho. Daisho literally means large and small or long and short. It does not specify that the swords were made together as a pair. Originally, even Daisho koshirae did not specify the koshirae were identically matched. I know all the schools of thought on what some refer to as a “true” daisho. Personally, I have always felt that is nothing more than a modern characterization. If you google the 47 Samurai's swords and look at their daisho, only a few were made by the same smith. Others were made by two completely different sword smiths. You will quickly see the “true” daisho hypothesis did not exist and certainly was not a “rule” in their time. Condition: See photos. All I know for certain is these are two very nice, polished, papered swords. Feel free to refer to them however you like once they are yours. WAS: $6,500 plus S/H and any additional associated fees (pp, wire, etc.) LIMITED TIME SALE PRICE: $5000 plus S/H and any associated fees such as Paypal fees, Wire fees, etc. *As with all Sale items, sale is final. All photos and information regarding this sword are included here. If you are interested in owning these swords, contact me via email only: yakiba.com@gmail.com _______

SOLD!

In all fairness it could use a polish. Hope I have allowed for that.

I remember that.

TACHI NAOHIRO in KOSHIRAE PUBLISHED ON PAGE 126 OF JOHN SLOUGH’S, “THE MODERN Japanese SWORDSMITH 1868-1945”. *MEASURMENTS IN INCHES. MEI: NAOHIRO SAKU KORE (TACHI MEI) DATE: TAISHO YON NEN HACHI GATSU BI NAGASA: 25 OVERALL: 30.75 MIHABA: 1 KASANE: 0.25 SORI: 0.75" NAKAGO: UBU MEKUGI ANA: ONE YASURIME: SUJIKAI MUNE: IORI HADA: KO-ITAME HAMON: SUGUHA BOSHI: KOMARU HORIMONO OMOTE: BO-HI with KAKU-DOME HORIMONO URA: BO-HI with KAKU-DOME HABAKI: 1 PC. SILVER KOSHIRAE There were a few Naohiro working in this time frame. Two are listed as working in Meji 1868-1912. Sloughs refers to this smith as Ueno Naohiro. Ueno Naohiro is listed as a Showa smith (1926-1989). This sword is dated Taisho (1915), so depending on his age when this sword was made certainly close enough for some overlap. If he was say 25 years old when he made this sword in 1915, he would have only been 36 in 1926. The blade has a very elegant and graceful shape as it tapers gently from a 1” motohaba to 0.625 (5/8") sakihaba ending at the ko-kissaki. Boshi is ko-maru The toshi-zori shape reminds me of the early Kamakura tachi where the kissaki was just slightly larger than the previous Heian period Ikubi kissaki. There are bo-hi carved bilaterally which end at the base in Kaku-Dome or squared end. The Kaku-dome are said to be the hardest to carve. The jihada is a tight well forged ko-itame/masame, almost muji. The hamon is an exquisitely controlled suguha in nioi-deki. Nakago is ubu with one mekugi ana, yasurimei is sujikai. The koshirae is modern as is the sword, with my personal opinion being that it is later or recent modern work. The koshirae is well made but feels like it was made very conservatively. It just doesn’t have the quality feel of a higher end koshirae. I do not mean to downplay the koshirae, but to maintain full transparency, I must be honest. So, what are the issues I am referring to? Almost everything, the saya is painted opposed to lacquered, the tsukmaki is far from well done. The tsuba is blackened or painted steel and some of the exterior has rubbed off. The pro’s are that the dragon menuki are pretty nice, The tachi fittings ie; kabutogane, ashi, koiguchi, kojiri are all matching and not bad, but are modern. This my opinion only, please look at the photos and decide for yourself. If I were to keep this one I would either have the koshirae redone or have a shirasaya made for it. REFERENCES: Hawley’s (NAO 30), pg. 573 Gendaito Meikan pg.108 Gendai Toko Meikan pg. 75B Slough’s Modern Japanese Swordsmiths pg.126 Nihonto Meikan (NMK-659) Toko Taikan pg. 446 Sesko’s, Swordsmiths A-Z., pg 764 To reiterate the blade is gorgeous. Courtesy of Sesko’s, Swordsmiths A-Z: NAOHIRO (直弘), Meiji (明治, 1868-1912), Ōshū – NAOHIRO (直弘), 2nd gen., Meiji (明治, 1868-1912), Musashi – “Naohiro” (直弘), son of the 6th gen. Naomichi (直道), he lived in Edo´s Ichigaya-Takajōmachi (市ケ谷鷹匠町), real name Yanagawa Saijirō (柳川才次郎), mostly a chōji-midare NAOHIRO (直弘), “Ueno Naohiro” (上野直弘) This Gendaito is published on page 126 of John Slough’s, The Modern Japanese Swordsmith 1868-1945 (see photo). Condition: See Photos. The information I have provided is all I have. Returns: Not accepted unless item is not as described. Ships USPS Priority Mail Insured. Your address and contact information is required to get an accurate shipping quote. Buyer is responsible for knowing your countries import laws and regulations. *LIMITED TIME SALE: As with all “sales” sale is final. $2800 plus S/H and any additional associated fees (pp, wire, etc.) *If you would like to own this beautiful Gendai Tachi, please contact me via EMAIL ONLY: yakiba.com@gmail.com

HOSOKAWA MASACHIKA SHINSHINTO RATING: 2 MILLION YEN MEI: MUMEI DATE: NONE NAGASA: 72.39cm (28.5") OVERALL: 96.52cm (38") MIHABA: 3.175cm (1.25") KASANE: 0.63cm (0.25") SORI: 2.222cm (0.875") NAKAGO: UBU MEKUGI ANA: ONE YASURIME: SUJIKAI MUNE: IORI HADA: ITAME WITH MASAME HAMON: KO-MIDARE BASED ON SUGUHA BOSHI: MIDARE-KOMI HORIMONO OMOTE: NONE HORIMONO URA: NONE HABAKI: ONE PIECE SILVER FOIL GUNTO KOSHIRAE NTHK KANTEISHO This is a long wide mumei katana attributed to den Hosokawa Masachika by the NTHK. The kanteisho does not directly attribute this katana to a specific generation, however, they do attribute this work to Musashi province and Kaei period (1848-1854). There were two generations of Hosokawa Masachika. The shodai, Tenpō (天保, 1830-1844), Musashi province, signed using the following combination of characters 正親. He was active from approximately 1830-1868 and was a student of the famous Hosokawa Masayoshi who in turn was a student of Suishinsei Masahide. The nidai Masachika, Kaei (嘉永, 1848-1854), Musashi province, never signed with the same characters as his father, but instead used 正近. Of note, the nidai was executed in 1868 for producing gimei blades. The working period of the two generations overlapped and with this sword being mumei we can ascertain this is what led to the den attribution. The kanji used for these papers is the Chika character used by the shodai 親, although that doesn’t mean anything other than that is what was written. I only mention this as I have seen Masachika papers using the character used by the nidai. The working date of Kaei would point to the nidai. This is a big beefy katana with a 28.5” nagasa and is 38” overall. Structurally, the blade is in great condition but not in great polish. There are a few light surface scratches or hikekake and a few stains, but nothing fatal, detrimental or anything which prevented it from receiving NTHK papers. Even with the less than optimal polish the blade still offers lots of activity to be seen, like chikei, kinsuji, sunagashi, etc., see photos. If this sword was re-polished it would be a stunning piece. The blade is housed in a standard Type 98 Gunto Koshirae. The koshirae is in good overall condition. The ito was replaced a few years ago as the original was tattered and falling apart. The saya has one small dent, and the paint is flaking in spots as seen in the photos. Courtesy of Sesko’s, Swordsmiths A-Z: MASACHIKA (正近), 2nd gen., Kaei (嘉永, 1848-1854), Musashi – “Namiesuke Masachika kore o saku” (濤江介正近作之), “Namiesuke Masachika” (濤江介正近作), “Masachika saku” (正近作), real name Sakai Namiesuke (酒井濤江介), he was the son of the 1st gen. Masachika (正親) but signed his name throughout his life with the characters (正近), i.e. never as (正親) like his father did, some sources list both smith in one entry, i.e. as one person and one generation, he lived in the village of Kobiki (小比企) in Hachiōji but moved later to Edo´s Kobikichō district (木挽町), we know blades from the Kaei to the Genji era (元治, 1864-1865), he was very talented but was executed in Hachiōji in the course of the execution of Ogura Tadamasa (小栗忠順, 1827-1868) in Keiō four (慶応, 1868) who sided with the bakufu against the emperor, but it is also said that he was executed for producing forgeries Condition: See Photos. NOTE: The photos didn't come out too good on this one. It looks better in hand that the photos. The close-ups of the activities reveal the condition better than the full length shots. The information provided is all I have on this item. Returns: No accepted unless item is not as described.Ships USPS Priority Mail Insured. Your address and contact information is required to get an accurate shipping quote. Buyer is responsible for knowing your countries import laws and regulations. *LIMITED TIME SALE: As with all “sales” sale is final. $800 plus any additional fees (S/H, PayPal, Wire, Insurance, etc) *To purchase, contact me via email only: Yakiba.com@gmail.com

SOLD

Lewis, These are not old papers. The issue date is shown in the photo, Heisei 22 (2010).

Some nice examples shown in this thread, thanks for sharing. I haven't seen one for sale in a long time. Only have one, it was gifted to me a few years ago.

ECHIZEN TOMOTSUGU O-WAKIZASHI SHINTO KYOHO c. 1716 ECHIZEN NTHK KANTEISHO SUGATA: SHINOGI ZUKURI MEI: OITE ESSHU TOMOTSUGU DATE: NONE NAGASA: 60.166cm (23.6875") OVERALL: 74.77cm (29.4375") MIHABA: 2.70cm (1.0625") KASANE: 0.635cm (0.25") SORI: 1.11cm (0.437") NAKAGO: UBU MEKUGI ANA: TWO YASURIME: SUJIKAI WITH KEISHO MUNE: IORI HADA: ITAME HAMON: KO SUGUHA BOSHI: OMARU HORIMONO OMOTE: NONE HORIMONO URA: NONE HABAKI: ONE PIECE GOLD FOIL SHIRASAYA & KOSHIRAE O-WAKIZASHI TOMOTSUGU NTHK KANTEISHO There are five generations of Echizen Tomotsugu swordsmith's listed in Hawley's. This smith is also listed in the Nihonto Meikan pg. 633, ref.: 09MC2K. The shodai or first generation worked around 1381 while the maker of this sword was most likely the last of this lineage working in the late Edo period and likely up into the early shinshinto period. This sword was attributed by the NTHK to Edo Shinto, Kyoho 1716. There are three basic designations, Katana, Wakizashi, Tanto and this a wakizashi. The term O-Wakizashi is used to emphasize its length. To meet the designation criteria for Katana, the nagasa must be 2 Shaku in length. Two Shaku equals 23.86” or 60.6044cm. The nagasa of this sword measures 60.166cm (23.6875") or 1 Shaku, 9 Sun, 8.6 Bu. It lacks a mere 1.44 Bu or 0.43635168cm (0.171792") being a Katana. The sugata is shinogi zukuri with tori-sori. The nakago is ubu with two mekugi ana and is beautifully signed, Esshu Ni Oite Tomotsugu. The yasurime is sujikai with keisho and yoko yasuri on the omote. The hada is a flawless, perfectly executed tight ko-itame which at first glance could be mistaken for muji. The hamon is suguha done in nie deki, there are chu nie and perhaps a sprinkling of ara nie in the monouchi area. The sword exhibits chu kissaki, the boshi is o-maru with hakekake. It comes in a new shirasaya with exotic wood hatome and a one-piece gold foil habaki. Koshirae with black lacquer saya. The Kojiri is horn and the Kurigata I believe is lacquered wood. The menuki are Misugane (turtles). The tsuba is a nice iron sukashi. The motif is of chidori and the four cross members could be a subtle Christian Cross(?). Comes with Kanteisho from the NTHK As with all “Sale Price” items, sale is final LIMITED TIME SALE: $1250 plus S/H and any additional associated fees (pp, wire, etc.) If you are interested in owning this sword, contact me via email only: yakiba.com@gmail.com

Sold! Thank you, Ed

SOLD! MASAHIRO, SOSHU MEI: SOSHU JU MASAHIRO DATE: NONE NAGASA: 45.08cm (17.75") OVERALL: 57.15cm (22.5") MIHABA: 2.698cm (1.0625") KASANE: 0.63cm (0.25") SORI: 1.27cm (0.5") NAKAGO: UBU MEKUGI ANA: TWO YASURIME: KIRI MUNE: IORI HADA: KO-ITAME HAMON: O-MIDARE WITH TOBIYAKI BOSHI: KO-MARU WITH HAKIKAKE HABAKI: 2 PIECE GOLD FOIL KOSHIRAE This sword is signed Soshu Ju Masahiro. I want to state clearly, the majority of swords signed Masahiro are gimei. On such a big name it is always wise to assume gimei when there are no papers to authenticate the mei. While the mei is undoubtedly false, which was common throughout history, the sword is guaranteed to be a genuine Nihonto. The blade is in relatively poor polish with a couple of small ware but no serious flaws. The hada is tight ko-itame with some masame. There is considerable activity to be seen (see photos). The koshirae is in poor to fair condition. The kurigata, kaerizuno, are intact. The aragawara is missing. The saya is a brown lacquer with some damage and losses, again see photos. The Fuchi / Kashira are a copper base with eggplant and foliage done in mixed metals of shakudo and gold wash. I have no idea what the menuki depict, but they are brass. Tsuba is iron with what I am calling a stylized amida rays. The Kozuka is done in gold utori and depicts a horse and spider web on the shakudo nanako jita. The Kogatana is signed Jiro Taro Naokatsu, but is likely gimei as well. This sword is being sold under the assumption that all signatures are gimei. Nonetheless it is a genuine Nihonto with no fatal flaws, and may be perfect for the budget constrained. $450 PLUS S/H and any associated fees (PP, Wire, etc.) At this price sale is final.

Gotō School (後藤) Kibei-Line (喜兵衛) Kyoto and Kaga Mitsunari, c.1719-1759 worked for the Kibei line of the Goto school. He became the 6th generation master or head of this branch. He was the son of Jōha (5th master). Over the span of his career he signed his works as Mitsuaki (光昭), Mitsunari (光生), Mitsuyori (光寄), Magojūrō (孫十郎) and also a variant character for Nari “成” as seen on this kozuka, Mitsunari (光成).

I think that one would be easier to call Kaen. I honestly try not to get caught up in semantics, and just stick to hakikake to prevent argument.