Jussi Ekholm

I think you have characters correctly in section 2. I hope more skilled language folks will chime in for confirmation. I think 瑞祥 in the description means auspicious, which I believe means for good luck in the future etc. While searching auspicious patterns with google, this image has two patterns in your tsuba in the middle row:

I think the signature is 長村清宣 - Nagamura Kiyonobu. WWII era smith. I think he is very unknown smith as I didn't find him in Seskos index. Perhaps the WWII specialized guys in here know more about him. Here is a reference sword: https://www.e-sword.jp/sale/2012/1210_1094syousai.htm

I believe the Chōgi that was in the meeting was this one (I used my detective skills ) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGJzAAXUcAUkKgv?format=jpg&name=large

I've been butting heads with Paul over this for a good while However I must agree with his analysis on that it is not the best Shikkake work qualitywise. The size of it and how it has been preserved make it rare and precious. You cannot find many ubu naginata of this length from Nanbokuchō period surviving. I was looking at the data that I currently have and I think I have 16 naginata of around this size or larger from Kamakura & Nanbokuchō periods that have survived to this day. Of them 13 are Bunkazai, Bijutsuhin or non-classified items owned by shrines. So in overall the chances in owning a naginata of this size and age are very slim even for someone in Japan.

The results for Jūyō 67 just came online. https://www.touken.or.jp/Portals/0/第67回重要刀剣等指定品発表.pdf Another very interesting session with lot to think about. Of course lot of wondering on my part as not having info or pictures of the items. I was very excited to see two Ōdachi in this session as they are incredibly rare. I believe these ones Morimitsu & Masaie are in the collection of Yasukuni Jinja. Both were previously unknown to me and seem to be longest examples by each ot the smiths that I am aware of. I did the swords in similar format as I've done before for my index and eventually when I have time for all the non-blade items I will update that to include the most recent results. Jūyō 67 swords.docx

Thank you for posting that very interesting book Dirk, I'll need to add that one to my long book list. Here is a history bit from the Sano Museum book that I took a pic for your other thread. I skipped one paragraph so I could fit in these that I have now as it takes so much time for me to type the kanji and translate it so I chose these parts. I'll add the original text as I most likely might have made an error or two in the process. Gassan was a swordsmith of Mōgusa group. Edo period sources [古刀銘盡大全] and [校正古刀銘鑑] state that he was son of Kiōmaru and moved to Dewa. It is said that the first generation was around Genryaku (1184) and Kenkyū (1190) and continued for generations. Looking at dated work of the school, there is work by Gunshō dated to (1367) [My other source has this sword as 貞治二 1363] and Gunshō dated to (1385) [This is listed as 元中三 1386 in Juyo 21], in the Muromachi period Chikanori works from Bunki & Eishō, Masanobu works from Eishō, Toshiyoshi works from Daiei & Tenbun can be found. From Kamakura period until the Early Muromachi period the school signed Gassan saku or Gassan. From the middle of Muromachi period many smiths put their personal names under Gassan. Main smiths include Chikanori, Masanobu, Yoshihisa, Toshiyoshi, Muneyoshi and Sadamitsu.

Best wishes and hoping for full recovery.

Here are two tanto both Tokubetsu Hozon by NBTHK: https://sanmei.com/contents/media/T2174_T5010_PUP.html https://www.tsuruginoya.com/mn1_3/f00117.html Then there are lots of his combination work with other smiths that do not have Ukyō no Suke in mei. I know there is a Katana in Jūyō 66 that has mei 備州長船勝光 / 文明十二二年八月日 so it is dated to 1482 but I have not seen info on it yet. I do have info 2 katana by Katsumitsu both dated to 1493 but I am not certain if they are late work by Ukyō no Suke or early work by Jirōzaemon.

I was looking at few sword glossaries and I think maybe 天井板 suggested by Steve would be the one used most.

I think you have given solid advice Franco. I just wanted that Tony would not feel too negative about the sword if it would happen to have a flaw or two. As he has mentioned several times he has been collecting just few years so far. I have a sword that has severe problems with boshi and I am perfectly ok with it. I do agree with your thoughts Franco that it is an important thing to consider as it will affect many things when collecting is considered.

I think you were correct with your notes David. It seems to be - Tenjōgane 天上金 or Tenjō 天上

I agree with Doug and Stephen above, don't be too stressed about small things. You have very interesting item and will be taking good route with UK folks giving you guidance along the way. Even though collectors often are focused on intact temper lines etc. The sword I posted above made into a prestigeous exhibition held by Sano Art Museum, Osaka Museum of History and Ichinoseki City Museum. I think there is commonly bit of divide between art vs. history. I am in the history crowd and I think your sword will be nice historical example even if it would have flaws. So I would agree with Doug that I would rather see impressive sword like this restored than lot of "average" stuff. Of course like Doug said there is always the financial factor.

I was thinking that Darcy had wrote about this a while ago. So instead of creating a new topic I thought I'd post this here after reading the monthly NBTHK magazine there was important note by Hinohara Dai after explanining the Shijo Kantei item.

I think there is hamon just that sword is out of polish / or amateur has touched it. Also the pictures taken head on with light are not really good in this case as I would suggest angling the blade towards the light source. I am not too good with photoshop but I tried to play with colors to make bit clearer where I am thinking I am seeing the hamon in this picture.

I think it is very interesting sword, congratulations on getting it with such limited information in overall. I would agree with Kirill that I think this would be genuine Gassan work from Muromachi period. I am going for conservative estimate with Muromachi as the Gassan swords signed on this side tend to be pointed towards Muromachi period (with the exception of 1 that is attributed as a Kamakura period work tachi and possibly oldest Gassan work I am aware of). Pre-Muromachi attribution to signed Gassan is very rare, and they are few in number like Kirill said above. I am attaching here a sword by Gassan smith Toshiyoshi as a reference, it is described being from 15th century but also put towards to late Muromachi in the description. I feel it has bit of the same wibe with very strong curvature and quite long blade in overall. Notice how this also has very small kissaki (tip) as your sword has. However that brings it toward the next question/point. I am hoping your sword still has boshi (hardening at the tip area). In this reference sword the hamon runs off the kissaki and is very faint near the upper blade portion. It cannot really be seen in the picture I posted but there is an oshigata in the book that shows it better. Token GB route is a good one as they have great members with huge knowledge.

This is highly speculative as the signature is very faint but I would guess it could be 月山作 - Gassan saku. You can see reference signature here: Gassan with saku added after seems to be much rarer way of signing than just Gassan based on the small data I have on Gassan signatures. Gassan smiths often worked in style that is quite easy to pinpoint. Unfortunately the sword is currently out of polish so it makes identifying features bit difficult.

I think for Bunkazai level stuff that has current government/state designation the process of acquiring them would be much more difficult as I believe the ownership needs to be known (yes there are some Bunkazai that current whereabouts are not known). I remember few years ago I accidentally stubmled upon the list that had recent changes of ownership for Bunkazai yearly and for many the monetary amount was listed too. I believe due to Japanese laws it might be that these are made public so that those interested can see. I do agree with Michael that these top tier items might be steering the thread bit off track as in general Kokuhō, JuBu and JuBi are kinda unobtainable for the majority. Also on thing that I have realized in recent years is that market is evolving constantly, so sometimes looking at the old prices might not be the best thing. What something was worth 10 years ago might not be the same today, as it can be higher or lower than it was. Of course things depend on multiple factors. Sellers can ask various prices even with very short timelapse. For example the mumei sword with attiribution to den Rai Kunimitsu (伝来国光) at Jūyō 25 was quite recently sold by 2 Japanese dealers. Aoi Art had it for 4,5M yen, then shortly after it appeared on Samurai Nippon for 6,3M yen and it is sold. Did Aoi price it below the market price? For how much it actually sold? Could it appear for sale again shortly or is it now gone for good? I would agree with Kirill that on higher tier items in general we only see the stuff that comes up to the websites. https://www.samurai-nippon.net/SHOP/V-1886.html I think this is one of the swords I have seen at most dealer sites. For the last 10 years I have recorded this at 5 different dealers. It could of course have been sold or listed even more times than this. In 2010 summer it appeared at Iida Koendo for 1,8M asking price. I remember I have marked that they lowered it to 1,6M eventually. Then on 2011 autumn it was listed at Meirin Sangyo but they didn't have price for it online as it needed to be asked. In 2014 autumn it passed the NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon shinsa, and in 2015 it appeared at Aoi Art and it had 2,1M asking price. Then in 2018 fall it appeared for sale at Japanese Sword Society of Canada, with now suddenly there was a tachi koshirae for it. JSSC do not list prices for items as I believe they need to be asked. It seems to be still listed at their site but in 2020 it appeared on Katana Hanbai, which I believe is site for Ginza Maruhide. It had now again lost the recently added on tachi koshirae and was soon listed as sold so I do not have price for it. https://web.archive.org/web/20100501011142/http:/iidakoendo.com:80/info/item/a226.htm https://web.archive.org/web/20110921053235/http:/www.nipponto.co.jp:80/swords/KT118207.htm https://www.aoijapan.net/katana-red-signature-rai-kunizane/ https://web.archive.org/web/20180917051137/http://www.japaneseswordsocietyofcanada.org/245-39.html https://katanahanbai.com/katanahanbai/raikunizane/ To show my earlier point with price fluctuation through times I can show it with same item and same seller. Iida Koendo has had this den Shizu (伝志津) sword from Jūyō 9 with koshirae for sale few times with different asking prices. In early 2011 it was listed for 7,5M yen. Then in the late 2012 it had been lowered to 5,5M yen asking price and it sold shortly after that. And now recently it came up for sale again, this time with 8,8M yen asking price. Now Iida being one of the premium and top Japanese dealers sure knows his stuff and what he can ask for an item. https://web.archive.org/web/20110313070519/http:/www.iidakoendo.com:80/info/item/a310.htm https://web.archive.org/web/20121120102501/http://www.iidakoendo.com/info/item/index.htm https://iidakoendo.com/758/ Here is one last one for this time. I actually thought this was extremely interesting deal, unfortunately I didn't have 1,5M yen of free money or I might have asked about it. I do not personally like the lower horimono on this but as items like this are super rare you often cannot get everything to your liking especially when considering the price. This is a naginata-naoshi wakizashi by Yoshioka Ichimonji smith Sukemitsu and it is dated to 1334. This was quite recently (2020) listed at Katana Hanbai for 1,5M yen, and I thought it was an amazing deal. Something I would love to own if only it had been possible. Then it got sold and it is now listed by Eirakudo at 3,5M yen. So unfortunately it is out of my personal reach now. Eirakudo seems to market it as a Jūyō candidate and due to the rarity I think it might have the potential. https://katanahanbai.com/katanahanbai/yoshioka-ichimonji-sukemitsu-2/ https://eirakudo.shop/token/tanto/detail/417834 Lot of this is just speculative and quite puzzling stuff in my opinion. Unfortunately I don't have as much detailed info on more affordable stuff. I am definately not shopping in this market so I am not sure how prices have changed for Shizu etc. recently.

I agree with Michael that this is very interesting and at the same time extremely complex topic. Personally I am not good at finacial / business mindset and even though I have been following the market for items that I find personally interesting for multiple years, I get very often puzzled by item pricing. I do consider myself as historical collector first and not an art collector, therefore I might value some things differently than those aiming for top end historical art swords. However I think that art collecting and historically focused collecting are definately not excluding each other as very often the same item would be held in high regard in both mindsets. I took Yasumitsu as an example as I knew I had great variation that I could find easily but I think similar thing can be seen in work by any smith (excluding the super top / extremely rare). And you can look into how great gap between high vs. low tier some mumei attributions have, and that is one very complex field to step into. I think at one end of the scope are the items of which only few comparable items are remaining in the world, pricing of those can be extremely difficult (some can be priced very highly while some can seem to be priced much lower than one might expect). Of course I think dealers are the ones who would have the best grasp on the current market. They are pricing the items to the prices they see potential for the items. Personally for me collecting is about emotions. Not the most logical or financially best way but I feel I must be emotionally attached to the item. Therefore I would be willing to potentially pay above market prices on the items I really like, while I might not go for higher quality item that would be financially and logically a better deal.

Seems like the Hokke escaped the auction without any bids and is now on the regular list. As a fun fact it was previously listed at Yahoo JP for much higher asking price. Mihara one was an interesting item too but I wasn't expecting such a bidding war on it, it seems to be at 750k now with several bidders in the game.

Friend from UK sent me some very old issues of Tōken Bijutsu for my collection and while going through them I found something very interesting for this thread in magazine number 101. Naginata by Echizen smith Sadakuni was featured as one of the kantei session items. It has very similar horimono to the one in this thread. Unfortunately my Japanese language knowledge is not up to par yet but I think the final sentence / 梅の彫も越前物である would mean that this type of plum horimono was made in Echizen.

I think the original question might be bit too large, and pricing can be very variable as different people can even price the same item quite differently. Here are 10 different items from Early Muromachi Bizen smith Yasumitsu, at 10 different price points. I will put price in yen as that is to me most logical as they are/were in Japan. I just chose Yasumitsu by random as there was some discussion about wakizashi by him and Morimitsu a while ago. You could make similar thing for any smith and see that there can be large gap between the high tier vs. low tier. Tachi (signed) - 6,7M - https://www.touken-sakata.com/刀剣一覧/太刀-銘-備州長船康光-古刀-上作-業物/ Wakizashi (signed and dated) - 5,0M - https://katananokura.jp/SHOP/2012-W01.html Tachi (signed and dated) - 2,5M - https://web.archive.org/web/20130711003641/http:/www.seiyudo.com:80/ka-060313.htm Tachi (signed) - 1,8M - https://www.aoijapan.net/katana-yasumitsuosafune/ Wakizashi (signed and dated) - 1,3M - https://www.nipponto.co.jp/swords5/WK328357.htm Wakizashi (signed and dated) - 1,1M - https://www.aoijapan.net/wakizashi-bishu-osafune-yasumitsu/ Katana (mumei) - 1,0M - https://www.aoijapan.net/katana-ubu-mumei-osafune-yasumitsu/ Wakizashi (signed and dated) - 600k - https://www.aoijapan.com/wakizashi-bishu-osafune-yasumitsu-3rd-generation/ Wakizashi (signed and dated) - 500k - https://www.e-sword.jp/sale/2009/0910_2041syousai.htm Wakizashi (mumei) - 300k - https://www.aoijapan.net/wakizashi-mumei-osafune-yasumitsu/ High price does not necessarily always correlate to high quality but I think it usually does when working with reputable dealers. People can ask whatever they want. However I do think in Japanese market the dealers are very aware about the prices and ask accordingly. Of course sometimes it is only logical to test the waters.

Koyama Munetsugu is highly regarded smith and the item in question is very nice. However there are lots of very good blades made by him available at the market currently and recently in Japan. So you can choose the one that is to your liking. The shop that has the item is a very good shop, they usually gear towards higher end items. I have never bought from them but I have visited their shop and a friend has bought from them with very good experience.

In my personal opinion the Yasumitsu at Aoi is ok, while I think the Morimitsu at Seikodo is very good. In general I am not of fan of price discussions even though I have tracked them for years. I feel people can have very different ideas on what something is worth (clearly can be seen in some of the recent western auctions). There are lot of Morimitsu and Yasumitsu wakizashi around and some items not for sale now will eventually pop up for sale. There is also huge gap in market prices between the low tier vs. high tier items. For Morimitsu wakizashi I've seen 380k - 5,5M and for Yasumitsu wakizashi I've seen 300k - 5M for public online listings. Often the better quality items fall into the inventory of sellers with great reputation (who can most likely squeeze the most out of the item). Here are some comparison items to give you idea what is out there. Morimitsu (was listed for 1,8M) https://ginza.choshuya.co.jp/sale/gj/8301/10/02.htm Morimitsu (was listed for 2M) https://web.archive.org/web/20160725194051/http:/iidakoendo.com:80/4101 Morimitsu (was listed for 2,2M) https://www.sanmei.com/contents/media/T125975_W8053_PUP_E.html Yasumitsu (was listed for 1,5M) https://web.archive.org/web/20131027234208/http:/samurai-nippon.net/V-1059/index.html Yasumitsu (was listed for 1,3M) https://www.nipponto.co.jp/swords5/WK328357.htm Yasumitsu (was listed for 1,1M) https://www.aoijapan.net/wakizashi-bishu-osafune-yasumitsu/

The second one is 平 and with Takada school it is read as Taira.

At least for me, for the first item you linked lot 55 shows actually wrong pictures. It shows the pictures of lot 57 katana attributed to Kashū Kagemitsu (which in my opinion has an unrealistic estimate based on the info I can see, like several swords in this auction seem to have). I do not know much about armor but I do think there are several really nice armors in this auction. As for swords to me this seems like a weak auction lot in general, although there are few interesting swords too.