Gakusee

Piers That is a tough one indeed. Even M Sesko’s volume is not clear on that perfectly as it has a couple of second and third generations and I have not looked too much further. But below are a couple of blades with dates 1570-1580 signed by Yosozaemon. The Juyo one of 1570 in the oshigata is specifically highlighted in brackets after the signature as the nidai. I would not get my hopes up by expecting an Yosozaemon (at least not until confirmed by the NBTHK)as he would most likely have signed with his name but even a school piece work with a date is great.

Brian You need to look at “Sukesada” as, at best, a large workshop and at worst a school in terms of size, designation and taxonomy group. What I mean best / worst is simply: best chances to identify a particular smith or slimmest chance, due to the sheer size of that family of smiths that survived the big Bizen flooding which wiped out the Bizen 1000 forges… If unnamed, it will be extremely difficult, unless the condition and quality are topmost and then again - you might struggle. One of the leading Sukesada who signed during 1580 is the second (nidai) Yosozaemon. So, it is a bonus that the sword is signed.

John, I would not get too discouraged by comparisons to the blade Ray linked above, as that particular example is among the very best Tomomitsu. In fact, it has participated in various NBTHK exhibitions such as the “Sword Country Bizen” one and has featured as the main sword in articles of the NBTHK magazine. Its hamon is more active and variegated than the usual Tomomitsu hamon, which is more similar to Kanemitsu in style (wavy notare). The polishing style (sashikomi vs hadori) as well as the age of polish and its state of preservation also have a bearing on how the hamon looks. Your (or to be yours) sword does overall look fairly good to me and I wish I could inspect it a bit more closely, especially the mei.

I agree with almost all of the comments above and you have some great advice there. My personal observations are: - often people submit and re-submit (if they can afford it and is feasible) until they are happy with the outcome - this could entail multiple submissions to the same or both organisations - sometimes, the judgements are different but they tend to be within the same broad period (eg late Kamakura or late Koto or something Muromachi or a specific era within Shinto, etc) and within the same broad level of skill (eg, very rarely a 'second' tier smith or school will be interpreted to be a 'top' tier master; also, extremely rarely are there any disagreements as to whether something is pristine Koto or ShinShinto) In my case, I have had a sword that a previous owner had passed through the NBTHK and NTHK. The NTHK agreed with its Oei Bizen designation and issued the papers. But the NBTHK disagreed with the mei and pronounced it gimei. The previous owner had the mei removed and nakago repatinated. The sword then passed through NBTHK as Ichimonji with flying colours. Also, Tanobe sensei when he saw it commented it was a typical Yoshioka Ichimonji. So, in some ways, the gimei was bringing it down to an extent. The NBTHK seems to be more commercially recognised and in Japan dealers prefer their papers. At levels below Juyo, the turnaround is actually 3-4 months (not 6) and one gets the judgment / result in a slip reasonably quickly after shinsa. The actual certificate takes another two months or so. As to this blade, could we actually see some more of the blade? As pointed above, Tomomitsu is a reasonably big Koto name and it will be interesting to see this example. Thank you.

https://blog.yuhindo.com/daisho/ If you want truly matched swords, go for Shinto, or more likely - ShinShinto or Gendaito. If it is the koshirae only - it has been discussed in the referenced links.

JP, you are one of the “good guys”. In life, sometimes we are bashed and battered, but still overall I am a believer in the great balance of life overall. Good karma and energy will come your way and our wishes are with you for swift recovery from the setbacks. As an aside, just before Christmas, I went to a house party hosted by a couple who also sheltered cats. They had 65, including the 4 newborn in a litter who appeared the day before. I hope your lot will also give you joy and you find joy and peace in this community and life. Stay the strong support to your family and community that you are.

Very solid thoughts above. I concur with Mark that unless you have bought something substantially below market (and that is extremely unusual and rare), if you are to seek nihonto as investment, you should go for high-grade items, preferably also rare. The problem is that many people are chasing such items despite their high price and they are acquired fast. With wakizashi blades, I am afraid to say, it is very, very difficult to hope for rarity, value appreciation, etc. If genuine and signed, by definition they will be Muromachi and later blades. And one needs to be careful with the quality/desirability of some Muromachi blades (many were produced back then and quality was not always good). If Shinto and Shinshinto, then you need to factor in the maker/rarity. I personally do not buy wakizashi blades unless they were shortened early Koto pieces as I am interested in Koto. On this particular blade: - some Fuyuhiro are very pedestrian and uninteresting - some are highly rated Juyo pieces and seem quite flamboyant, in decent Soshu style - the white papers seem 'legitimate' but are old/outdated/discontinued and replaced by other, modern papers (this is a separate and involved topic) - one of the papers is a registration card (torokusho) = an internal, Japan-only licence for the sword to exist within Japan legally (normally not exported outside of Japan)

Sunny, I like your vivid imagination on this but I think it was probably more prosaic: the narrative on that website that David Stiles linked (describes in detail what was stolen and when and from whom) mentioned Kodama san was in hospital during the burglary. It must have been orchestrated by people who knew well what he had, so might have been in his wider circle of acquaintances.

Daniel M, Neither the NBTHK nor the To-Ken Society of GB are commercial organisations or professional intermediaries for services such as shinsa, restoration et cetera. They are both non-profit educational membership organisations. So, the To-Ken Society of GB has never had anyone doing the service you describe. What you probably mean is that Paul Martin, who used to come back to the U.K. to see family and for returning /taking items, has not been doing it for a while? Paul does these activities professionally and outside of the remit of the To-Ken Society. There have been other people in the U.K. who have done it or can do it (eg a London dealer comes to mind, Eddie Wertheim of the Japanese Gallery, but I know of others do it). I have sent blades out of the U.K. but not in the last two Covid-defined years, when everything has been three times more difficult than in ordinary times. I think the way to think about this is: - which airline and postage method works for one to ship a blade to Japan (eg EMS used to be very good and Parcelforce). One can do it without an intermediary but needs an agent in Japan. - can one do the paperwork for such outbound shipping - finally, could one get the contact in Japan who will a) clear the blade through Customs and obtain temporary torokusho, b) get permanent torokusho which will be needed for shinsa and the blade’s stay in Japan, c) submit the blade to the NBTHK and deal with the NBTHK on one’s behalf d) de-register the blade with the Ministry and apply for export permit and e) package and ship it back to you. Many people can do all of this in Japan for you. People tend to use dealers for these services but there are other specialists like Paul Martin, Kelly Schmidt, Bob Hughes (Keichodo) etc in Japan who also used to / do that. So, if you want an end-to-end service, depending on your country of residence, my recommendation would be to get in touch with one of the Nihonto dealers in that country and enquire. If you have contacts in Japan and encumber yourself with shipping and posting to the agent there, they will handle the difficult part.

Steve M I think someone bought it for “bragging” rights. The buyer knows he is not buying a genuine zaimei Muramasa (these are well over $70k for a papered daito and over $30-40k for the short swords) and the seller knows he is not selling a genuine Muramasa. If we go into the actual sword, it looks like a nice Shinto sword. I note that: - it does not seem to have the nagare and “not-so-pretty” hada of a genuine Muramasa - the yakiba lacks the kinsuji and sunagashi and some other niesuji one often encounters in Muramasa - also the hamon neither seems symmetrical nor has the “ha-kissing” low tani that characterise this family I suppose someone bought a nice looking (mumei after mei removal) Shinto sword for around $4.5k.

Yes, I agree Stephen. The ana normally is sort of between Mura and Masa. Also, the vertical lines of Mura are nice and parallel in Shoshin. The jiri is also a bit off.

No problem, I shall just go through all of them, including the food and other stuff :))

Thanks, Pierce. We appreciate your kind sharing with us. Are there close-up photos of the Yukimitsu and Nagamitsu somewhere? Found the Chogi.

Piers, yes, thanks. I check his Twitter from time to time (ever since you posted a link to him a couple of years ago), but I am not always certain which blade is which because he also runs a kantei and posts the kantei swords and then other swords and then explanation of the kantei and then other swords and so on and so forth. For someone who does not speak Japanese, it is a bit confusing. For sure, I do enjoy the photography and where I can read the kanji, I do confirm what I think or where I am wrong but overall it is a bit confusing. In any case, thank you for posting.

Excellent! Were you allowed to take pics of the blades? Probably not but if you stole a moment or two , please share!

That looks great, Piers. That is an excellent selection to get people talking. You are only missing a decent kabuto to round it off! Of course, I understand it had to be “light” armour, but still…..

It looks like a hybrid of Japanese style and European basket hilt sword guard, from which it was undoubtedly inspired.

Yes, we discussed this together with some folks. Very rough and very ugly but a very nice sugata and rare. However, rarity per se has not been a decisive factor for the NBTHK in the last 2-3 years when they have overlooked extremely rare and highly ranked smiths and passed them over for “promotion” to the more ethereal ranks of the grading ladder. The conclusion we reached after analysing how they have been behaving lately (kind of last 3-4 shinsa) was that they seem to lately award a heavier weight to sugata - big, manly, as preserved as possible lengthwise.

Thank you, Uwe!

What is the title of the big compendium?

Thanks, Uwe. Indeed I do not speak Japanese unfortunately but I think I might just about manage with my electronic translators to get to what I need. I appreciate the recommendations!

Uwe is there a bigger book on Daimyo mon please? I have been looking for a bigger tome than Chappelear. Thanks for the suggestions.

Wow, Jiri, that is stunning! I am away from my Hawley and Chapelier mon booklet but I am sure someone else will be able to answer.

I agree with Thomas and Axel: this is a nice little blade with a fairly decent attribution. It kind of reminds one even of Hasebe exuberance in some aspects of the blade. So, yes, whatever the attribution in the broader ballpark of good quality Soshu disciple from the Nanbokucho period, that will be fine. And people need to be able to live with that fuzziness of attribution within the broader framework. If I were into that type of thing, I would seriously consider it at this interesting and tempting junction of [price point, quality, attribution, level of certification]. So, I would not be surprised if some Soshu lovers pile into this. Disclaimer: not my blade or belonging to anyone I know and I have no commercial or other interest inherent in this blade or its sale/purchase. Lately, there has been a lot of interest in Soshu. That has logically been driving prices up. There are still some attractively priced opportunities around Soshu tier-II (eg various Den Sa school work, Den Hasebe etc) but even these are disappearing fast.

John, the above might be true. Or might not. I tend to trust more the NBTHK on average than Tsuruta. But what is clearly stated of implied by Aoi is that it is better than an average Tametsugu. I have no issue with dark jigane (as this is very Northern, ie Etchu) and when I read of tightly forged jihada, I am usually positive as this is a favourable trait (unless so tight and homogeneous as to lead to a Shinto/ShinShinto conclusion). So, this piece “surprises on the upside” as they say in financial circles, rather than disappoint “on the downside”.