klee Posted Friday at 11:56 PM Report Posted Friday at 11:56 PM Good evening Bought this off of an ebay auction as just a display piece and not really part of my actual collection since im certain it s super gimei ( Mino No Kami Fujiwara Jumyo ) But I am curious to know what time period it might be from. It kind of looked shinshinto to me but im sure other here are far better at at making educated guesses. I liked the blade for what it was and for a couple hundred dollars I did not mind it at all. Thank you in advance -Kevin L Quote
Bosco Posted Saturday at 12:09 AM Report Posted Saturday at 12:09 AM My newbie eyes, its late Muromachi ? 1 Quote
Grey Doffin Posted Saturday at 01:10 AM Report Posted Saturday at 01:10 AM Possibly Kanbun Shinto. Grey 5 Quote
PNSSHOGUN Posted Saturday at 01:24 AM Report Posted Saturday at 01:24 AM Little Sori was popular during Kanbun Shinto, and later Shin Shinto. 3 Quote
YourBabyBjornBorg Posted Saturday at 06:50 AM Report Posted Saturday at 06:50 AM Hi! Can we have a look at the signature? This could be a genuine Shinshinto Jumyo. Sugata looks Kanbun, but Kitae is Shinshinto-like, so it would help if we had specific data on this sword, if this is notably long, broad and thick, then it is more likely a Shinshinto. 1 Quote
klee Posted Saturday at 07:36 AM Author Report Posted Saturday at 07:36 AM 59 minutes ago, YourBabyBjornBorg said: Hi! Can we have a look at the signature? This could be a genuine Shinshinto Jumyo. Sugata looks Kanbun, but Kitae is Shinshinto-like, so it would help if we had specific data on this sword, if this is notably long, broad and thick, then it is more likely a Shinshinto. Hello ! Thank you for the insight. Yes here is the mei/nakago close up. I am not very familiar with Jumyo but it seems the only Jumyo who signed like this was Kanbun Jumyo. I did compare the mei and it looked quite different than the nbthk authenticated ones from Kanbun. It is also a long wakizashi ( 54cm ). The nakago patina also seemed a bit strange to me. Quote
YourBabyBjornBorg Posted Saturday at 07:41 AM Report Posted Saturday at 07:41 AM Edited: Oh! I'm sorry, but this does look like a Gimei. Looking at the Nakago, this could be Shinshinto or even Showa IMHO. Yes! I did not know people would do this, but just like what Rivkin san said, the Nakago is cleaned. So no Showa, but Shinto (or Shinshinto). 1 Quote
klee Posted Saturday at 07:47 AM Author Report Posted Saturday at 07:47 AM 3 minutes ago, YourBabyBjornBorg said: Oh! I'm sorry, but this does look like a Gimei. Looking at the Nakago, this could be Shinshinto or even Showa IMHO. Lol no worries. I was very certain this was gimei when I bought it. It was just a pretty blade for $300 so I figued id enjoy it as it is 😊 1 Quote
Rivkin Posted Saturday at 10:01 AM Report Posted Saturday at 10:01 AM Nakago was cleaned recently, i.e. the rust inside characters is actually quite old. I am 80% for the signature being authentic. Probably 1670-1730, might be a lesser known generation in 1700s, it is often the case as sword market collapsed completely 1705-1710. Not a typical style for the school, but one of Edo period's attempts at something Rai-ish. 2 1 Quote
Jacques Posted Saturday at 11:22 AM Report Posted Saturday at 11:22 AM Obiously gimei https://www.samuraimuseum.jp/shop/product/antique-Japanese-sword-wakizashi-signed-by-mino-no-kami-jyumyo-nbthk-hozon-certificate/?srsltid=AfmBOooramjpL2uGeOLrUD0P28RwlYDsa4aUalfgD_SBsxJpnjvUi4dq Quote
Lareon Posted Saturday at 06:27 PM Report Posted Saturday at 06:27 PM I also vote Kanbun Shinto 1 Quote
klee Posted Saturday at 06:47 PM Author Report Posted Saturday at 06:47 PM 8 hours ago, Rivkin said: Nakago was cleaned recently, i.e. the rust inside characters is actually quite old. I am 80% for the signature being authentic. Probably 1670-1730, might be a lesser known generation in 1700s, it is often the case as sword market collapsed completely 1705-1710. Not a typical style for the school, but one of Edo period's attempts at something Rai-ish. Thank you for the insight as always. I was definitely not aware of such a dramatic collapse early 1700. Quote
Ooitame Posted Saturday at 08:33 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:33 PM I also agree Kanbun/Shinto. 1 Quote
klee Posted Saturday at 10:36 PM Author Report Posted Saturday at 10:36 PM Thank you for the input everyone. Very much appreciated. It is a pleasant surprise to see everyone lean Kanbun. I thought it was a much newer blade. If I may ask, what are some of the indentification points that suggests Kanbun as opposed to 1700+ ? I only ever collect and read into koto works and schools so my shinto knowledge is near non existant Thank you in advance Kevin L Quote
Ooitame Posted yesterday at 01:13 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:13 AM Hi @klee, just look at the overall sughata, the mune turns to masame, general health of the blade, Nakago patina (this sword not a prime example from cleaning or tight tsuka) etc ... Google Kanbun Katanas and you will see a pattern. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.