Jump to content

Murata Swords 村田刀


Kiipu

Recommended Posts

On 11/20/2020 at 4:52 PM, Kiipu said:

Nakago Reverse

新折衷和洋之刀制爰謹令我東京砲兵工廠小銃製造所鍛冶造焉

Page 181 of Slough's book gives the translation as "By order of the new Japanese-European combined sword system,  I respectfully forged this at the Tokyo Artillery Arsenal & Small Arms Factory."  A minor correction is in order though in regards to this translation.  The characters 東京砲兵工廠小銃製造所 translate as "Rifle Factory of Tōkyō Artillery Arsenal."

 

I located a second correction by Morita san to Slough's rendition of 新折衷和洋之刀制爰謹令我東京砲兵工廠小銃製造所鍛冶造焉.  This concerns the last character 焉 which merely means the end of a sentence.

Mr.Slough's Oshigata book.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Thomas,

John @PNSSHOGUN just found a beauty that I think might be a zoheito.  Uniquely has the Suya Shoten stamp on the nakago by the number "14"  Is this Yoshichika?  And what is the single kanji at the top of the mei, cut by the ana?

 

Update: After talking it over with John, the Suya stamp likely indicates this blade had been previously fitted by the Suya Shoten Co. and the blade is likely traditionally made.

 

found HERE.

2csenlx5rdwui6.jpg

8gainprjuf694.jpg

8vyf0sxpek6gu4.jpg

hg43upxncevwf.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Bruce Pennington said:

And what is the single kanji at the top of the mei, cut by the ana?

 

I like the picture of the Suya stamp.  As to the characters, the white piece of paper pictured above shows what they are.  In this case, they are 二代  源良近作之.

二代 = second generation.

源 = Minamoto.

良近 = Yoshichika.

Edited by Kiipu
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many Yoshichika swords, Shodai & Nidai, are found in Suya mounts but I have never seen the stamp on a sword before. Could this mean they were making swords for Suya directly at some stage, or at least contracted? As Yoshichika made swords for the Imperial Guards as well perhaps they are all connected somehow.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • 4 months later...

A nice zoheito found by @mecox, thanks Mal!

 

https://vi.raptor.ebaydesc.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemDescV4&item=134007324527&category=165599&pm=1&ds=0&t=1643389175924&cspheader=1


I’m away from home at the moment.  Will post some pics when able.

 

Note the copper mekugi the seller apologized for damaging during removal.  I have seen a couple of these come up recently, and I had mentioned to the owners that I thought it was post-war because I did not know they made copper ones during the war. But this one sure looks like it was original.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Matt,

I am not sure what there might be to say about you new swords. BUT! I am very glad that you revitalized this thread. It really is very good. I wonder of folks in Tokyo - and at the National Museum are following this discussion. It really is good research!

Peter

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sword actually dates from 1933 to 1945, more likely earlier rather than later.  The logo is that of Kokura Arsenal along with a Kokura 小 final inspection mark. Below is a link to a drawing of a jig used in the manufacture of your sword blade.  As of 1934, the location of blade manufacture was Kokura Kōshō Tōkyō Heiki Seizō-sho 小倉工廠東京兵器製造所 Tōkyō Ordnance Factory of Kokura Arsenal.  This factory formally belonged to Tōkyō Arsenal but was transferred to Kokura Arsenal when it came into existence in 1933.

System Kaizen behind the Type 32 Gunto production of the 1930s

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Type 8/19 'kyugunto' was officially replaced in 1934, so there is a year overlap with what Thomas stated.  But even though the 'official' army sword after 1934 was the shingunto, officers were known to carry the kyugunto through the entire span of WWII (Dawson and Fuller both state this).

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Almost certain those fittings are modern reproductions, similar ones have cropped up on yahoo.jp auctions before. Here is a stated replica dagger with the same style. A good reminder that not everything coming out of Japan is automatically original.

 

https://buyee.jp/item/yahoo/auction/w1041773928?conversionType=service_page_search

 

image.thumb.png.ffc030ecdd4d30636123c207e0254510.png

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The prefix rifle 小銃 used by Kanemasa 兼正 is most likely the location where the blade was made.  In this case, the Rifle Factory of Tōkyō Artillery Arsenal 東京砲兵工廠小銃製造所.  The first two blades are actually marked with the full name.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
On 5/11/2022 at 7:46 AM, Ontario_Archaeology said:

I recently bought one from the Plimpton collection... Here are some photos of the tang. Sorry this might be a murata to. I'm not sure if these are the same or not. 

 

IMG_20220510_184003.thumb.jpg.a0b688d55d8e2042e24c9566a622027f.jpg

This is a 造兵刀,"ホ" is Kokura Army Arsenal  First Factory inspection marks.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Adding to this. 

 

One my father Imported recently from Japan. Purchased from 刀剣開陽堂 (token kaiyodo) in Kyoto Japan. 

 

A little mistranslation in the slide. According to the owner of the shop, Mr. Yokota, says the blade was signed off as a pseudonym of Murata as "shojyu Kanemasa" as per his book. Made at akabane arsenal in June of the 22nd year of Meiji. 1889. 

 

Authenticated on June 8th, 2001 

20200325_152231.jpg

media-1572070259917-Jul_19_2019_7_53_PM.jpg

Slide2_1572074369627.JPG

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum Ryo.  I ran across your father's sword over at GBF and have the number down as 5/95 as shown in the list above.  The 小銃 is probably referring to the location, in this case the Rifle Factory of Tōkyō Artillery Arsenal.

Our Murata Collection so far! Rifles and a rare sword!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
10 hours ago, PNSSHOGUN said:

Kanemasa

Nice one John!  The blade tip doesn't look like a standard zoheito.  Maybe a Muratato?

534111694_MeijiX4tip.thumb.png.5f5aecc93856f09d50f66445bcabdcb1.png

 

 

Can anyone make out the date?  I see Meiji (1868) [?] 4 year, 8 month.  It's that one kanji I don't recognize:

1772287962_MeijiX4.thumb.png.a0e9119f1cc123024c58027a06fbd0db.png

 

The fittings are really well made, too bad about that wire wrap.

1261715382_s-l1600(5).thumb.jpg.0030b4f3101174c5c9041b1550659afd.jpg

 

1854986069_s-l1600(1).thumb.jpg.3a39ba9088f19939e3b364b02cb98e65.jpg860943279_s-l1600(2).thumb.jpg.7fd7f9938de1a942acfbf0006ad2cb3d.jpg

s-l1600.thumb.jpg.a49dce484e08862162bc0bdff0b315c1.jpg

 

Also numbered "4  59"

613314274_459.thumb.png.9402070a614af76aec8cb68c2f54545b.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...