Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't know much about this sword and am open to any suggestions to point me in the right direction I can take more pictures if needed. Thanks!

post-3594-0-81762400-1464624731_thumb.png

post-3594-0-43419100-1464624737_thumb.png

post-3594-0-47641300-1464624744_thumb.png

post-3594-0-64843700-1464624761_thumb.png

Posted

Yasushige, a Yasukuni-to (sword made at Yasukuni shrine) and dated a lucky day in July, 1940. Attached is the write-up from Tom Kishida's book on Yasukuni-to.

 

Best regards

Ray

post-457-0-35159300-1464626241_thumb.jpg

Posted

So this is a handmade sword and not a mass produced military one? I state that because I couldn't see any grain on it which made me think it was a tempered military one. That being said, I don't have much experience with the military period swords.

Posted

He was rated one million yen in the Toko Taikan - which is the minimum for the gendai smiths listed, but very few smiths were listed from Showa.  So even at 1M, it's a very good thing!  

 

Here is another link that has another example of Yasushige: http://www.jp-sword.com/files/yasukuni/yasukunito.html

 

Here is the write up from Markus' index:

Yasushige (靖繁), Shōwa (昭和, 1926-1989), Tōkyō – „Yasushige“ (靖繁), civilian name „Satō Shigeo“ (佐藤繁雄), he came originally
from Yamagata Prefecture and studied under Ikeda Yasumitsu (池田靖光), he was an excellent horimono carver and did not forge any blades
after World War II, records show us that he made about 850 blades for the Yasukuni forge
Posted

Hello:

 Please don't put me in the "its wrong camp" (if there is one), but I would be curious to read what someone thoroughly familiar with written kanji on nakago thinks of the mei. I think it needs some careful looking at. In comparison with the mei in Kishida's book, there seem to be some differences with those shown there, and I wonder about what appear to be delaminations in the nakago steel. Yasukuni smiths were particularly careful and quality conscious in all respects. I am probably wrong, just curious.

 Arnold F.

Posted

I'm not a Yasukunito guy, but my initial thought is that it's good. More and better pics of the blade and full nakago would be helpful. While Yasushige isn't a bad smith, he also wouldn't be the first to be faked - a lot of money in the better/founding smiths. Does that mean it can't be wrong? No. Just that there is less benefit to faking this signature and wasting an opportunity to fake Yasunori, hiro, mitsu, etc.

Posted

I think it's good. Take a look at the individual strokes in the kanji compared to the links I attached. Looks good. Nakago jiri is correct. Even the example from Yasukunito has a slight split - I have seen this with other really good smiths as wel. Not ideal, but not the end of the world.

 

We'll take a peek at pics of the blade when you get a chance.

Posted

My vote remains unchanged. I think it's good. There is a shinsa in the US every couple years. This is WELL worth the effort and expense in pushing it through. Keep in mind some think papering gendai is a waste of money - not me though. Everything I own is either papered or in the process. Nice sword!

Posted

if it fits the mounts properly it is without doubt genuine. The actual quality of the blade requires a good hard look as they all vary and this one has some possible issues. Nice sword

Posted

What is happened on the Nakago. Looks like a tank was rolling over it.

Have you a picture from the hole blade? Is there another bend and maybe a crack in that blade?

  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...