Ron,
in some cases, when corrosion has eaten away too much material, signatures remain guesswork. In this case, I also thought the first KANJI might be TAIRA, but I have no books on blades or signatures to check that.
What you could try would be making photos on a plain dark background, in a dark room and spotlights (not too strong to avoid glare) shining from the side.
I found that extreme magnification often does not help much.
Nicolo,
then it is not a WAKIZASHI but a TANTO. A desirable form of a Japanese sword, but in this neglected condition, there is not much that we could say. I can only strongly recommend to let a professional polisher (= TOGISHI) have a close look at it. If the basic condition was still good (= the blade has not been in a fire or so), it might be saved. There are some of these guys in the U.S. so sending it to Japan is perhaps not necessary.
But a complete restoration will not be cheap!
Might be KANESADA. It seems as if the NAKAGO had been "cleened" (= sandpapered) which is really very sad as the patina is gone. Big value loss!
Is the blade longer than 303 mm (measured from the notch on the back just above the HABAKI to thr tip) ?
To be sure about that we should see very good photos of the BÔSHI, if possible in magnification. Dark background, dark room, using spotlights, sworg oriented tip-upwards.
Anthony,
if you want to put the photos in the correct orientation and post them in the TRANSLATION section, you might have more success.
First and second photo (not much to read) with a 90° left turn.
Third photo with a 90° right turn, but then it is still mirrored (= backside).
Forth photo with 90° left turn, but it is also mirrored (= backside).
I assume these papers are just a kind of padding or a means to stiffen the object. I don't think they have to do with the armour; might even be printed.