Hokke

I dunno D, that’s a fine line, but you may be right. The judge may have seen indications of detail in the blade that were not pronounced in its current polish. His recommendation to have it repolished to bring out those details for certain would certainly make it more easily judged for tokuju. On the other hand, humans are humans and he may have just been trying to steer money toward a friend of his. As for preserving nihonto for the long term, yes, it’s a goal, but since these swords will never see use, if a new polish will better exemplify the work of a smith, it would presumably be the last time it was polished.

Sometimes simple is just as elegant........solid silver with a single groove

Is there anything with contrast editing that was done the picture? To me, it’s similar to Hankei in the O mokume, but that activity in the hamon seems quite different. There are places where the hamon would extend father into the ji, but wasn’t for sake of uniformity.

I seem to remember the same being mentioned in a documentary on Musashi. I believe it was mentioned he was also buried in the standing position. Who knows, legends and stories are vast with this one. As for his bokuto, there is one in a museum, but I believe it is labeled as a replica. Anyone with an oar length piece of wood could have claimed it was “the one”. Even if one does exist, can’t see anyway to definitively prove it.

I, like Adam would love to see that if you find the opportunity.

I agree, dont see how it could be anything else

Yes, thats very strange. I dont think it's upside down though. Something else going on in that pic. I dont see any way to have gotten the habaki that high up on the nakago if it were upside down.Whatever the reason, its strange it actually went to print like that.

You and I both......ah well, one day I'll get something right, then I'll know it's time to hang it up and retire on an upnote

Definitely not hira zukuri….looks more like kanmuriotoshi-zukuri?

Thank you Piers, no need to make a special inquiry on my behalf, I was just thinking out loud. Does the potter you mentioned have a site of a place where he sells his works, I would be interested to see them.

Hey D, yes I understood the post by Piers, I just always find it curious how things are described versus reality. Im not questioning anything Piers stated since it wasn't first hand knowledge to him, it's just a general curiosity on my end.

That is interesting......im curious as to the meaning of "several blades" and "discarding" in this instance. For some reason, something in my gut says these blades were not destroyed, unless the reason for them being discarded were structural flaws, which seems unlikely.

Hey Bruce, just for clarity, it wasn't Derek who labeled this as WWII, it was the OP. I understand your point though, that said, I agree with derek that it's important for folks to post in the appropriate forum based on their information and if it needs to be moved, it will certainly be moved.

Perhaps, unfortunately, it's a rather enigmatic message, that has many plausible meanings. That said, if that was the intended meaning, I would be very happy, I think pride in ones work is fine.

I believe the term masterpiece can only applied by the smith as a personal designation, as in, this is MY masterpiece. However, because of humility and the wish not to be prideful, it's not a term you will likely find in recorded history. Calling something a masterpiece is very close to calling something perfect. It's a term that is too relative and has no official scale. People other the smith may apply these labels, but it's generally for two reasons. Personal admiration, or to aid in a sale.

Well, thats lots of words to say you don’t like the idea of someone being buried with their nihonto. Unfortunately, since there is ZERO you can do to prevent it, hence relying on morality and not law, turns out, it IS acceptable. I agree, this is not up for debate. However, if you are by some authority, stating that it is a RULE of this forum that nihonto MUST be passed on, whether it be through sale or gift, as a prerequisite for participation here, then by all means pull your strings and let’s see that disclosure when people create an account. Otherwise, how about refraining from pulling a productive thread into the weeds. All that said, it is not my choice to be buried with my possessions, arrangements were made years ago, but I, like many others will not be told what I must do with my property, based on someone else’s morals. You may think this is the same issue as someone who wants to DIY a polish, but it’s not. The key difference is “intent to destroy”.

Im not sure why you have made such an assumption, unless it was in an effort to lash out at someone with whom you may disagree. Invoking the name of a past member whose participation was selfish and destructive, seems to serve no purpose. What I do know is this: preservation and study of nihonto is personal. Once you own an item, you can do with it as you please. If your assertion is that because one individual chooses to remand their collection to the deep, that somehow this will influence others to do the same, is a stretch to say the least, but then you already know that. You can view it how ever you wish of course, but accusing members of seeking attention based on nothing but your personal feelings, is hardly the way to maintain positive decorum here.

Agreed, its certainly the most optimal choice.

Because, in general, people dont have the luxury of knowing when their time is up. People spend good money on their collectibles and want to enjoy them for as long as possible. If I remember from your previous comments, you still own collectibles and yet you could be hit by a bus tomorrow which means someone else would likely be "burdened" with your possessions. All that said, I think the relevant points have been made by many, starting with Bruce. If you have collectables, make notes on their cost and potential value. Leave the names of friends who can sell them online or trusted dealers. This way, it's not a burden to anyone, but only a phone call away from disposition.

Perhaps this is because there is no real way to ensure anything. Once you are gone, you're gone and they can do as they wish. The only thing one can do is trust in the relationships they have forged and hope you chose wisely.

I appreciate your candor, I of course was not expecting you to air your actual fees, but now that you have, $125/h seems extraordinarily reasonable in today's market for the amount of knowledge and experience you bring. Also serves to infuriate those like myself who have paid mechanics and other contractors, similar rates, for subpar knowledge and services. Such is life.....

Greetings Markus, im curious, do you have a flat rate per day, or do you charge per item? I imagine some items require more research than others, but if the collection is large enough, a per diem seems more logical.

This is true, however, the inflation rate doesn't always correspond to collectables as it does to other assets. As for knowing if something will gain value......that requires a crystal ball and a gypsy

It isn't the number of pieces you have, but the values. That said, insurance is generally for total loss. For most people this is fire or theft. If fire is a concern more than theft, gun safes can be purchased very inexpensively because fire resistance materials are relatively simple and cheap. If theft is a concern, TL and higher rated safes will give both fire and theft security. So if you live in a high crime area or like to brag to people near you about your collection, you may want to look into insurance or a TL+ safe. All that said, as Adam mentioned, insurance is easy to get and often times is relatively cheap. Just remember that your annual premium devalues your items over time. What I mean by that is, if you have a $50k item and pay $1k per year to insure it, after ten years you have $60k invested in the item, not $50k.