BANGBANGSAN

Brendan Thanks for the info on the auction house. but I can't find that sword, maybe because the auction ended?

Besides 湊川神社（Minatogowa Jinja）,四条畷神社(Shijonawate Jinja)in Osaka also uses 菊水紋( Kikusui Mon). Many families also adopt the Kikusui Mon as their crest. https://irohakamon.c...on/kiku/kikusui.html

Do you have the link to this sword?

This is an interesting one, has both an anchor and a 岐 mark. These are all the photos of this sword that are on Facebook. Smith 兼玄 Kaneharu Date 昭和二十年五月 1945 May

Lefty special

1.豐州高田住藤原行長 Hoshu Takada Ju Fujiwara Yukinaga 2.助宗 SukeMune

三品正広 wanna be

I am aware that it's a legitimate one

he bought it.

I came across this Type 95 on Facebook. Interestingly, the serial number is situated on the opposite side. This is the first one of its kind that I have ever seen.

Could it be 重富 Shigetomi?

Thanks, Conway！

Could you post a photo of the tag?

Maybe you should read this info about Mantestu sword http://ohmura-study.net/998.html In my previous response on the other thread, this sword is a presentation sword given to their employee. Apart from the signature (mei) containing that information, it is a standard-made Mantetsu sword. They made around 35000（maybe a little more) Mantetsu swords during 7 years, we are uncertain about the exact number of these swords that were gifted; I speculate not too many, perhaps a couple hundred or so? However, yours is the only one that has surfaced by far.

レ五二四 =Re 524

Nicholas Thanks for posting the ser#.I saw this sword posted on a Facebook group not long ago. I was interested in purchasing it, but the guy mentioned to me the seller who prefers dealing with buyers in person.

@Kiipu Mauro & Conway nail it

Dan PLease post some photos after you get it

中野栄三

I do not have content for article 11, maybe Thomas can help?

@Bruce Pennington That 特 (Special)mark is one of the Extraordinary stamps.

John Found another work by 伊奈波 兼波之作, this one without cutting off the mei. Comparing it to the one I posted earlier with a partially cut-off mei, the signature does not appear to be carved by the same individual.

here is Army 陸軍捻（諸捻卷）vs Navy Tachi style (平卷）

Correction: it should be vertical 一一八 instead of 天

It says“陸軍捻“=the army (style) wrapping