Bruce Pennington

Thanks for the interesting story! Curious as to why you decided they were not samurai swords. Many officers and sometimes an NCO carried old family blades handed down through the centuries. Yes remounted in military fittings most of the time. So wondering what you learned about them that made you rule out the possibility.

Waiting for the nakago pics of the military blades!

Thanks for the added photo George. And Mal, thanks for clearing that up. I misunderstood my own annotation! I thought I was reading a first name, but I put it in parenthesis because it was an alternate art name he used.

I have the nakago photos of yours, Barry, but not of the whole gunto. I didn't know where to find the thread I got the pics from or I'd have posted the link. Here's what I have:

George, I have both of those, plus more, but I got them from your survey and don't have photos on file. If it's possible, I'd love to get the photos. Here are the charted numbers I have, like this on the mune. There seem to be a different stamping practice with the "1", "2", and "3" (there is a "6" on file too) combined with an arsenal stamp. My suspicion is something like "inspector 1" "inspector 2" or "inspection 1 or 2" because several blades are found with the same number + arsenal stamp. The larger numbers seem to have a different function, for they are nearly perfectly linear. Only a couple on record out of sequence. The Nagamitsu numbering seems to be in it's own class, tied to the smith. @george trotter - a question about the Mitsunobu(Teruhide) mei from one of your articles, in a kaigunto - Sesko only lists one Showa era Mitsunobu but he's not "Teruhide". And none of the older era Mitsunobu listed are Teruhide. Is it possible this guy is the Showa Kaneda Mitsuhiro (金田光弘), listed by Sesko and the Teruhide has some other significance? Sesko's was an RJT smith and that would align perfectly with the mune stamping practice we see with all the others. 1943, Feb Kanetoshi (RJT) – Gifu Na 30 on mune Star Simpleman, NMB RS 1944, May Masakuni (RJT) – Osada 78 on mune Star Trotter Survey 1944, Jun Masakuni (RJT) – Osaka 75 on mune Star Volker62, NMB RS 1944, Jul Tomonari (RJT) – Kobe Hyogo 24 on mune Star 1944, Aug Kunihide (RJT) – Kyoto 90 on mune Trotter Survey 1944, Aug Kunihide (RJT) – Kyoto 98 on mune Trotter Survey 1944, Aug Kunihide (RJT) – Kyoto 99 on mune Trotter Survey ND Mitsunobu(Teruhide) 707 on mune UniqueJapan.com; kaigunto ND Nagamitsu (RJT) イ313 on mune Ooitame; NMB, RS ND Nagamitsu (RJT) 695 on mune Spidersrule123,NMB,RS ND Nagamitsu (RJT) 2005 on mune Reeder, NMB ND Nagamitsu (RJT) 2205 on mune Roromush, NMB, RS ND Nagamitsu (RJT) 1 saka 3490 on mune Vajo; NMB ND Nagamitsu (RJT) 3973 on mune IJASWORDS, NMB broken heart seppa ND Nagamitsu (RJT) 1阪3991 on mune mauser99; NMB ND Toyo Knife Co; Shinbo “Bravely Brandish” 510 on mune; “S九” on mune Paul Griff, NMB; “10” on fittings

Victor, Nice one! The blade seems to be in decent shape. You the tsuka and saya could be restored with a re-paint. Some collectors prefer to leave gunto in the condition they were found in, as it is the "life of the blade". Some will restore. I have one Type 95 that I repainted. It looks too new and too good, so it's not ideal, but it's better than the gold paint it arrived in. Even the blade had been painted gold. I had a buddy who paints model airplanes do the tsuka, and I did the saya. Hard to get the WWII Army green just right. On another note, I have 5 Type 95s on file with the "W" or "M" stamp and 3 of the 5 are Iijima blades. One is a Kobe and the 5th is steel fuchi, but probably Seki. All 5 are Tokyo blades.

Rechecked files. The '44s I have are "Kokura" mei. The '45 I have on file with star is also a "Kokura" mei. And I didn't have Trystan's which is a '44 Kokura. This is the first one I have marked "Kosuga".

@Shamsy @Stegel another one for the records.

Links to other blades with the mei: Tanrenjo Mei - Stu W Can someone please help me identify this - dominator315 Kai Gunto - Ed Wolf Nice Naval Officers Sword - Ed Hicks Tsuba and Gunto mei Translation Needed - truelotus Translation Help - mdiddy Assistance with mei Please - b.hennick Translation - daishobohi And the tally went up to 18, 16 with mei.

Barry's post seems to be the best one for a continuing line on the Tenshozan Tanrenjo mei blades. I've gotten 16 Tenshozan blades on file now, 13 with the forge mei. The latest comes from a friend with what may be the first one sighted of it's kind - one with a bohi. I've seen navy blades with bohi, on rare occasion, but I've searched and cannot see that I've ever come across a Tenshozan Tanrenjo mei blade with one. Dated March 1942, so the third earliest on file with the anchor stamp and second earliest with the mei.

Wanted to post an update to 2 stamps previously in the 'unknown' category in the Stamps Doc. Thanks to @mecox's newest tome - Showa Swordsmiths of Aichi Prefecture, I can now tie them to specific smiths. The "diamond" stamp is found on the work of Kuniyasu: Mal uncovered 5 blades with this stamp, all Kuniyasu. One even has 2 diamond stamps: Of course, we still don't know the meaning or significance of them, but they seem to be specific to this smith, unless they show up someplace else in the future. The other is the "delta" stamp, or triangle. It's seen on Masayasu blades. Mal shows blades with 1, 2, 3, and 4 of them: I've been working on an update for the Stamps Doc and I'll be sure to include this new information. Thanks again to Mal Cox for the great work!

Let's see your Nagoya Type 95 NCO gunto!

Very well could be. I mention the island swords, too, because this is how their nakago always look. If this were the case for yours, it's still a Japanese officer sword, but simply made "over there somewhere".

Oh, it's hurting my eyes!!! Dang, two of these. They must be late war. With what we know about sword production being moved out of country in the last year, I wonder if these were made in occupied territory. It's the first thing I thought about when I saw the "workmanship" of those nakago.

I want to post these two from a discussion on the Translation Forum, to consolidate the items to this topic. One is a souvenir for sale on fleabay (mislabeled as a Navy kaigunto - seller notified) and the other posted by @MacTheWhopper HERE. They are interesting because both blades were made by Toyosuke, a Toyokawa Navy blade in Type 98 fittings, and the other in souvenir fittings. Toyosuke in Type 98 fittings: Toyosuke in Souvenir: So, either this smith was actively making swords both before and after the war, or as a minimum, there were surplus blades of his to use by Tenshozan after the war. Still doesn't prove either case, but I found it fascinating to see blades of the same smith in both wartime and post-war fittings.

Thanks guys! And thanks for the links for that other you Moriyama-san! This makes for an interesting turn of events. It shows blades made by Toyosuke in both war fittings - @MacTheWhopper's Type 98 - and in souvenir fittings. So either the smith was still working for the forge making the souvenirs after the war or the blade was surplus. So, it doesn't clear up the question of whether some of the souvenir blades were surplus, but it's a "real life" example of a smith's blades on both sides of the war's end.

I'll make a post to say "I don't know what to say!" Your guess sounds as logical as anything I could speculate.

I don't have a close-up of it. Maybe @charlie1 does.

Trystan, Here are the photos I have on file. Don't know the source.

Just seeking clarification, and I'm no expert on WWII arsenals, but I cannot find a Tokugawa Navy Arsenal. There was a Tokugawa shogunate in Aichi way back when, but all I find in WWII is the Toyokawa Navy Arsenal in Nagoya, Aichi, hence the circled anchor stamp on these blades. Forgive my ignorance, but is Mr. Plimpton alive, and is he available for email correspondence? To me, this is still sounding too much like the post-war souvenir put out by the Tenshozan factory under the Toyokawa arsenal. While the regulations loosened up for quality standards in the last year of the war, I cannot imagine the uniform regulations allowing for mixed Army/Navy fittings. Now, I'll remind myself of the adage "Never say never, nor always, with WWII gunto." When I first started studying this oddity, I was likewise wondering if they started using all available parts to assemble whatever gunto they could manage. But after finding the documentation proving that Tenshozan was making souvenirs, and had an example with take-home papers, it is more conceivable to see these as post-war made, rather than late-war made. So, I'd be interested to learn if Mr. Plimpton has other evidence verifying this particular style was made before war's end.

Can't make out the first kanji. Appreciate the help! It's on a post-war souvenir Toyokawa blade.

Grey, Is that a quote from the upcoming book? It would explain a lot, and would be very useful information to know. Like I said above, this seems to be a precursor to what Tenshozan put out for the Army PX after the war.

Dang, ruined a really good whine I had going! Just proves the point that "It can always be worse!" Ha!

@DTM72 - Dan, nice group, hope you can keep them all. Check out this article on what is mistakenly called a “Navy landing sword.” It’s Army, most of all. The discussion explains the rest. Looking forward to photos! https://www.warrelics.eu/forum/Japanese-militaria/legally-rebutting-existence-type-3-army-officers-sword-708745/

If Brian would give us a raise, we could hire editors to proofread our work! But this is such a low budget operation, I have to make my own coffee!!