John C Posted May 18 Author Report Posted May 18 4604 is now logged in - thank you, Conway! BTW 4604 helps to narrow down when they stopped stamping the serial number side - somewhere around 4500 would be my guess at this point. Thanks to everyone's input, I'm also getting a handle on which stamps were used and when. I've translated a couple and still working on the rest. Also, other swords from this era (including an artillery sword) have some of the same inspection marks. John C. 2 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted June 3 Report Posted June 3 Here is one for you, John. Comes from Leo Monson’s collection. 1 Quote
John C Posted June 4 Author Report Posted June 4 Thanks, Bruce. 16092 is now logged under Leo Munson. BTW, second to the oldest on file. Still seems likely only 17,000 were produced. John C. 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted September 13 Report Posted September 13 After pinning the Type 95 Worksheet thread, it's had over 1200 views. So, you don't mind, I'm pinning John's thread in hopes more folks will see it and add to John's study. 2 1 Quote
Conway S Posted September 13 Report Posted September 13 Good idea, Bruce! The Meiji period NCO swords are really quite interesting to me, like the Type 25, Type 32, and other lesser encountered swords (ex. Type 8 riding swords). I am glad enthusiasts here, like @John C, are compiling records on some of them. 1 1 Quote
John C Posted November 11 Author Report Posted November 11 34 minutes ago, drb 1643 said: 5546 is on eBay. That's excellent, Tom. Didn't have that one. Do you have the link or title of the auction so I can check for stamps on the other side of the ricasso? John C. Quote
Scogg Posted November 11 Report Posted November 11 17 minutes ago, drb 1643 said: Are we allowed to post active auctions? Yes, definitely. That said, if it’s an item you’re currently bidding on, posting the active auction could draw extra attention, and potentially more bidders, which might hurt your chances. That’s a risk you’ll need to weigh for yourself. I’d also suggest attaching a photo. That way, once the auction ends and the listing disappears, we’ll still have a visual reference here on the forum. (Looks like ya'll already covered that ). All the best, -Sam 1 Quote
John C Posted November 11 Author Report Posted November 11 21 minutes ago, drb 1643 said: Are we allowed to post active auctions? As Sam indicated, yes. Indeed, you almost have to if posting a picture from the auction to "cite your source" according to Fair Use Doctrine (you can use it for research or education, like in this case, just not commercially). John C. 1 Quote
John C Posted November 11 Author Report Posted November 11 Update: Tom - I found the auction and got a picture of the marks on the ricasso from him. Thanks again. For those interested: We now have 41 Meiji 25 (1892) serial numbers; 9 different inspector stamps. Still working on deciphering the the stamps to get a list of potential inspector names. John C. Quote
drb 1643 Posted November 11 Report Posted November 11 Ok good, I just got home from work and was going to look it up and post it. I’m glad you found it. Tom 1 Quote
John C Posted December 6 Author Report Posted December 6 Thanks, Sam. That's a new one for the list. Up to 42 examples. Interesting that the seller lists it as "WW1." I assume he means Japan-Russo war (~1905) and even then it wasn't widely used with the introduction of the type 32. John C. 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted December 6 Report Posted December 6 Very strange that both sides were ground down to make machi, as if someone was going to mount a traditional samurai style handle. Quote
Kiipu Posted December 6 Report Posted December 6 I think that is a fold of blue background cloth overlapping the blade? Quote
Scogg Posted December 6 Report Posted December 6 Both sides were definitely ground down, for reasons I fail to imagine. Bruce's theory makes as much sense as any, but then, why stop half-way through the conversion? Have you seen any others with this "machi-okuri situation" @John C? 1 Quote
John C Posted December 6 Author Report Posted December 6 6 hours ago, Scogg said: Have you seen any others with this No. Nothing like that. In fact, I thought for a moment that a digit might have been ground off, however the gap between the blade and latch is only slightly wider than what I would expect. John C. 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted December 7 Report Posted December 7 I admit, too, John that I'd never noticed that the 25s were stamped on the hand guard like the 32s. Quote
John C Posted December 7 Author Report Posted December 7 13 minutes ago, Bruce Pennington said: never noticed that the 25s were stamped Looks like the inspector stamp was on the blade side opposite the serial number, with the Tokyo and date stamps on the guard, through around 13,000. Then all the stamps moved to the guard. Of course, this is based on a very limited sample size and may not be completely accurate. John C. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.