Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

4604 is now logged in - thank you, Conway!

BTW 4604 helps to narrow down when they stopped stamping the serial number side - somewhere around 4500 would be my guess at this point. Thanks to everyone's input, I'm also getting a handle on which stamps were used and when. I've translated a couple and still working on the rest. Also, other swords from this era (including an artillery sword) have some of the same inspection marks.

 

John C.

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Thanks, Bruce. 16092 is now logged under Leo Munson. BTW, second to the oldest on file. Still seems likely only 17,000 were produced.

 

John C.

  • Thanks 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Good idea, Bruce! The Meiji period NCO swords are really quite interesting to me, like the Type 25, Type 32, and other lesser encountered swords (ex. Type 8 riding swords). I am glad enthusiasts here, like @John C, are compiling records on some of them. 

  • Love 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted
34 minutes ago, drb 1643 said:

5546 is on eBay.

That's excellent, Tom. Didn't have that one. Do you have the link or title of the auction so I can check for stamps on the other side of the ricasso?

 

John C.

Posted
17 minutes ago, drb 1643 said:

Are we allowed to post active auctions?

Yes, definitely.

 

That said, if it’s an item you’re currently bidding on, posting the active auction could draw extra attention, and potentially more bidders, which might hurt your chances. That’s a risk you’ll need to weigh for yourself.
 

I’d also suggest attaching a photo. That way, once the auction ends and the listing disappears, we’ll still have a visual reference here on the forum. (Looks like ya'll already covered that :thumbsup:).

All the best,
-Sam

  • Love 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, drb 1643 said:

Are we allowed to post active auctions?

As Sam indicated, yes. Indeed, you almost have to if posting a picture from the auction to "cite your source" according to Fair Use Doctrine (you can use it for research or education, like in this case, just not commercially). 

 

John C.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Update:

Tom - I found the auction and got a picture of the marks on the ricasso from him. Thanks again.

 

For those interested:

We now have 41 Meiji 25 (1892) serial numbers; 9 different inspector stamps. Still working on deciphering the the stamps to get a list of potential inspector names.

 

John C.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Thanks, Sam. That's a new one for the list. Up to 42 examples. Interesting that the seller lists it as "WW1." I assume he means Japan-Russo war (~1905) and even then it wasn't widely used with the introduction of the type 32.

 

John C. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Both sides were definitely ground down, for reasons I fail to imagine. Bruce's theory makes as much sense as any, but then, why stop half-way through the conversion?

Have you seen any others with this "machi-okuri situation@John C

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Scogg said:

Have you seen any others with this

No. Nothing like that. In fact, I thought for a moment that a digit might have been ground off, however the gap between the blade and latch is only slightly wider than what I would expect.

 

John C. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Bruce Pennington said:

never noticed that the 25s were stamped

Looks like the inspector stamp was on the blade side opposite the serial number, with the Tokyo and date stamps on the guard, through around 13,000. Then all the stamps moved to the guard. Of course, this is based on a very limited sample size and may not be completely accurate.

 

John C.

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...