Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Excellent, Michael, that's a beauty!

I may be wrong, but I believe that is Takeyasu.  Here's an example that is easier to read:

IMG_6077.thumb.jpeg.07be3c0064f67369ad13769734b084e0.jpeg

 

Hard to tell from your photo the size of the anchor stamp.  Can you give a measure of it's diameter?

Posted

Thank you Bruce. I will measure the anchor stamp as soon as I can and repost it. Have you ever seen one with the peg in the Kashira? Do you have other #95 recorded?
 MikeR

Posted
19 hours ago, Michaelr said:

Have you ever seen one with the peg in the Kashira? Do you have other #95 recorded?
 MikeR

Mike, I didn't go through all 118, but in the 30 or so I found 4.  Here's one, one of the two that came with the PX souvenir letter.  Signed Hiratoshi, with no painted number:

image.thumb.jpeg.6abb658e36e6da1bfb083a64ed3f645f.jpegimage.thumb.jpeg.03dc2188cb73253f4ed943a0ff53fa37.jpeg

It is an odd thing.  The nakago doesn't have an ana there, so can't imagine the purpose of the peg.

 

I have one other 95:
 

 

Mei

Date

Anchor

Fittings

Kabu finish

Jiri Finished?

#

Source

88.       

Takeyasu

ND

Small

Standard

Texture

Yes, shaped

95

Michaelr, NMB

89.       

Mumei

ND

Large

Standard

sarute

Unknwn

No

95

Smallsword; ebay

Posted
4 hours ago, Nazar said:

here is another one from the same site:

Good one, Nazar, thank you!  An interesting one, too, with that stamped "119."  Normally we see this on wartime blades, although I do have four others with stamped numbers.  I'm tempted to think this was a war surplus blade, but that unfinished nakago with heat coloration sure looks like something made by the souvenir operation.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Here's one of those puzzling ones.  Found on this Toovey's Auction.  Mumei, no observable stamp, #65.  Fittings are typical Army, but hey are not gold gilded.  Most puzzling is the tsuka ito which clearly had been handled/carried considerably, look at the sweat stains.  Adding to the list of souvenirs with sarute ... and this one is a bit unusual.

 

3563-11-Copy.thumb.jpg.8acb94225c2502879e7cc06447b1f48a.jpg

3563-7-Copy.thumb.jpg.163b13d168d3fb9fa74d3f61f20d84e5.jpg

3563-1.thumb.jpg.b8e723b0fbca5d06cdfbbe339f381cf2.jpg

3563-5-Copy.thumb.jpg.a7840f3723e0397bf4155d09d5f08bec.jpg3563-6-Copy.thumb.jpg.ea7ed445847fc3b2ae078d3f2ed04257.jpg

Posted
On 11/19/2025 at 3:27 AM, Bruce Pennington said:

Here's one of those puzzling ones.  Found on this Toovey's Auction.  Mumei, no observable stamp, #65.  Fittings are typical Army, but hey are not gold gilded.  Most puzzling is the tsuka ito which clearly

Interesting that this example at the Toovies auction does not have the 1 piece fuchi indicates an earlier souvenir made with wartime army fittings very likely a wartime built blade suriaged for standard length tsuka at the Tenshozan Tanrenjo is my guess.

  • Love 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Jcstroud said:

does not have the 1 piece fuchi

Good catch John. I hadn’t noticed that. It goes along with the rest of the fittings not being gold gilded. Kind of supports the idea that they were using surplus parts initially.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Nice one, Nazar!  Shaped nakago jiri and no heat stains, so likely a surplus blade from war production.  Checking the chart, with our duplicate numbers, most have one blade that has finished jiri and the other/s do not, supporting the theory that the finished blades were surplus and the unfinished blades were made for the souvenir contract.

  • Love 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...