Jump to content

has anyone heard of this swordsmith?


Recommended Posts

Hi, I have a traditionally made WW2 era sword in type 3 mountings I bought a year ago or so. the blade is star stamped (no showa /arsenal stamp) and the seller says it was made by takeshita hirokuni. I thought when I bought it I checked out this smith and although hard to find he was listed in the rikugun jumei tosho list of smiths. But today I double checked this sword and the only smith I could find who was rikugun jumei tosho and had a similar name was takeshita yusukuni .

Does anyone know if there actually was a army approved smith named takeshita hirokuni? the seller said it was a rare smith, but now I'm thinking he may have been rare cause he never existed haha. :roll: (mistake in translation)

The sword is great though and I have no regrets. Can anyone give me any info?

Im going to open a new topic to have the mei read correctly soon when I work out how to up load the photos.

Thanks.

Andy.W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok thanks guys, I've been trying to get some photos to upload so hopefully it works this time. Thanks for the link Geraint, I'm not great in translating mei and comparing it sometimes but from what I could see it look different in a spot and also the hamon is different compared to my blade. Hopefully these photos will upload now. If it works I will add a few more to show comparisons.

 

Andy.w

post-4879-14196890264118_thumb.jpg

post-4879-14196890270055_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Chris, hmm that's what the seller said, takeshita hirokuni but I cant find any info on this maker. the seller said he was a rare smith, not much work of his around/ if any cause ive never seen another.

??? really weird.

Also there is kanji on the dated side of the tang next to the number 84, im not sure what that says, maybe manufacturing related? I was told the dated side of the tang translates to May 1943.

It just seams bizarre to me that who ever made this sword was very capable but the maker is not known. Maybe a mistake in the mei ? the star stamp and everything is genuine and I had the impression before that I found this smith in rikugun jumei tosho list but it wasn't in another list I looked in. Now I cant find him anywhere. Sorry for the photos of the blade, doesn't show everything.

 

Andy.W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please compare your blade signed Takeshita Hirokuni to one signed by Takeshita Yasukuni. I think you will see that they are by the same hand. Nakago is also the same shape.

 

Sometimes smiths took a different name when working for the military. I believe that is the case here. In my opinion, Takeshita Yasukuni and Takeshita Hirokuni are the same smith. He worked in Hokkaido and was a good smith.

 

Your sword:

post-1462-14196890285924_thumb.jpg

 

Takeshita Yasukuni:

post-1462-14196890283225_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Chris, you may be right. I thought that it could be a possibility that the sword smith used a different name. The nakago looks similar, I'm not too sure about the mei and the different Hamons ive seen before but I'm no expert. Could have had several different scribers engrave the mei for the RJT too. I guess without comparing the blades in person or without complete photos there would be no way to be 100% sure.

I guess I will keep my eye out for another sword similarly signed to see if this happened more than once but I havnt seen another yet.

I will add some more complete photos of the sword and koshirae so if anyone see's this link in the future and can confirm this or find another signed the same.

 

Can anyone please translate the kanji next to the 84 stamp on the date side? and also I'm just curious if the date says a lucky day in may 1943 or just a day in may 1943?

Merry Christmas All and thankyou for your help.

 

Andy.W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Adam, yeah its a really nice sword in original polish. The better swords in type 3 mounts were dark brown like this mount. I have a theory that it belonged to a higher ranking officer and was handed in on surrender. From what I've seen the higher ranking officers swords were more often in better condition or near mint condition (maybe lack of use or maybe they were taken better care of because they were higher quality gendaito). And Star stamped swords made traditionally were more often reserved for the higher ranking officers. I believe there are signs this may have had a tassel at one stage but was removed like many during surrender. But there is no way of knowing any of this for sure without knowing its history.

Either way I'm happy with it cause its getting harder to find them in this condition and time will only add to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey Chris and Andy,

on the matter of unknown RJT mei...and a RJT using different mei for various reasons...I was under the impression that this may be the case of when making a private order versus when making a RJT gunto, but, as usual I am partly right-partly wrong.

Looking in my own research file (duuuh...why didn't I do that first?) for RJT Yamagami Munetoshi, I find that I have recorded two mei for him...he used one "Toshi" in civilian gunto sword signing (see oshi pic) and carried it over into RJT sword signing in 1943, but part way through 1943 he started to use a different "Toshi" exclusively for RJT gunto (see pic). I only have the last in RJT but have also seen star stamped mei of the first one.

So, it is possible to find his star stamped swords with Munetoshi signed both ways.

I expect it is the same for other smiths also...such as Hirokuni and Yasukuni....and also that other unknown RJT? mei you were discussing recently Chris of the Kato school...Masamichi?

Hope this helps,

post-787-1419689154295_thumb.jpeg

post-787-14196891543994_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 years later...

@Stephen thanks from bringing this thread up!  This blade is stamped with the katakana "Ho" which is one I don't have in the database!  We need (ok, I need) to find out what prefecture Hirokuni worked in.  Japaneseswordindex.com lists a "Ikusa no Kajitsu Hisakuni", but is "Kajitsu" a different Hisakuni than Takeshita?  @george trotter any ideas?  They do list, as stated above, that Takeshita Yasukuni was RJT.  Does anyone know the prefecture for Yasukuni?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/23/2013 at 6:13 PM, nihonto ken korekuta said:

Also there is kanji on the dated side of the tang next to the number 84, I'm not sure what that says, maybe manufacturing related?

I was told the dated side of the tang translates to May 1943.

 

It is the katakana character ホ.  It is thought that these markings are association or arsenal related.  See this post by Bruce and my reply that follows.

Arsenal Mark on RJT sword Fittings, Post #103

 

The blade is dated using the legendary founding of Japan in 660 BC.

皇紀二千六百三年五月日 = A day in May 1943.

 

Below are the markings on the other side of the tang.

竹下宏國作之

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...