Jump to content

Mark

Dealers
  • Posts

    2,230
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Mark

  1. Brian thanks for fixing the picture. it looks better. I am hoping someone on the list may own, or remeber a sword with this stamp that was signed, worth a try
  2. John Thanks for looking!
  3. must be the camera but it is stamped into the steel
  4. A friend bought a sword that is not signed but has a "Hot Stamp". It is a hirazukuri katana with wild gunome/chogi. It is well made and i would guess late shinshinto or gendai. My friend is trying to idendify the maker. Has anyone seen this stamp before? Thanks
  5. i was just going on what i could see ( i realize there are no pictures of the blade). That is why i put such a large range. If the blade is not well made it should still bring close to $1000 on eBay as it is a signed katana in complete mounts, the flashy saya should help on eBay. Even if the blade appears well made the sword does not have a paper, is "out of the woodwork" so not in fresh polish, so i would think $3500 or so is about the max range. Maybe i am wrong, he asked for a value and i said it was a "guess". just trying to be helpful
  6. Wow! 2 Kotetsu (one with cutting test) and a Kiyomaru --- guess i did not need to drive all that way to NYC to see rare swords
  7. how long is the sword? hard to say value without a close look but probably more that $1000 and less than $3500...........just a guess from a picture
  8. That type of tanto usually dates from the late 1800's, most i have seen are unsigned. It is nice to have the kozuka/kogai
  9. looks like BiShu Osafune Norimitsu
  10. i has a loose handle for an NCO sword a while back. As i recall the wood insert was in 2 parts.
  11. it looks like a standard Showa era civilian sword (people were interested in swords during the 1930's when Japan was trying to expand its empire), you could buy swords like this at larger "department" stores. many were later used by army officers. It is probably not totally traditionaly made but i have seen some decent swords with grain that have a Showa stamp so they are partly hand made
  12. Paul not sure exactly what you need. from what i see the parts of the sword are "genuine" but not high quality. So from what i see it is "real and genuine". To say more with out a close examination of the blade is foolish. If it is a few hundered dollars it is probably fine, if the seller wants several hundred or 1k+ you will need clear pictures of the blade and you still run the risk of a hagire if it is not examined in hand best i can do, hope it helps
  13. I agree with ED. The mei looks questionable to me, masanori signed with a fine (sharp thin) chisel, but in your example the kanji are very "chippy" not as smooth as other references. Some of the kanji seem a bit too "squat"...... If it has ben owned by collectors in the past and has no papers i would be conscerned. I think it best to buy it based on the value of the blade, assuming it is mumei, if a seller wants a premuim based on the mei it seems logical that it waould have been papered in the past to vailidate the mei and the associated Premium
  14. sword is a Showa sword, maybe hand made. but no need to spend time looking everything up, if you want a quick answer --- DROP EVERYTHING AND GO IMMEDIATLY AND GET THE 10K !!!! Deliver the sword on hand and knee if needed, the buyer has made an ofer "that you can't refuse"
  15. it looks like the NCO sword in the background is also a Chinese copy
  16. i would second what Grey said. The sword has been here long before we were and will be here long after we are gone (if we care for them). So keep a light coat of oil on it. read books, go to shows and ask opinions from people who see it. Check the mei, maybe submit to a shinsa in the next few years. Then decide the polish the blade deserves (once you know what you have), and go from there. No need to make a quick decision
  17. tang says it was made by Masahide
  18. you have it right - good job. I have not seen the blade but it should be a good value for $100. Not sure what Kunihiro it is as he does not give much to go on, but if i have to guess i would say it is probably a gimei of Horikawa Kunihiro. The mei looks poorly written, it is stiff and "chippy". it may be another maker, or if it is a great blade you can remove the mei (after it is PROVED to be gimei if that is the case).
  19. says No shu Ju Fujiwara Kanesada - meaning made by Kanesada of the Fujiwara clan who lived in Mino province
  20. i do not know the blade length now,,,,, but i would think that if it is still a katana that the mei would have been folded over,,, no reason to cut it off and inset it ( i only see that with short - 2 kanji mei- that were from very long swords)............ seems strange
  21. Thank you! I will look him up, maybe i will find something now i have the right name
  22. Mark

    new buy

    i agree 2/1941 but maybe kanemichi?
  23. i remember seeing this in hand at a few shows, as i recall it did not sell due to the price and what restoration would cost and what you would have when done. The temperline was "uninteresting" the shape was nothing special and maker is noone of note. Seems it was priced at around $1100 so with polish, papers, etc you would end up with maybe 3k (US$) in it and for that you can buy something already done, plus you have the worry of problems coming out when polished. I will bet the reserve is even higher than the price at the show so i doubt i would consider it a bargan but if it were $6-700 when i had seen it i think i would have bought it..... anyway just my opinion, i bet it sells for a lot more, the seller seems to get unbelivable prices for his swords
  24. I have a katana that i am sure is Showa era, looks to be Gendai. These is no date and a mei of 2 kanji that are written in a cursive style. My best guess is Chikatada but i could be wrong. I tried looking for a smith by that name and did not find anything, that made me think i may have it wrong. Any help appreciated. Thanks!
  25. It is almost impossible to be exact from pictures. I would want to hold the blade before trying to make a kantei opinion. I said Shitahara as i had an unsigned blade with noticable pools of mokume spaced along the blade just below the shinogi. the NBTHK judged it as Shitahara and gave it to an individual. that school worked in 14-1500's. After getting it back i found that was book descriptions matched the work in my sword, so i learned something. Your blade seemed to have similar traits, so that was a guess.
×
×
  • Create New...