Curtis,
it seems that you base your speculation on two factors: the futatsuji hi and what looks like a gunome hamon.
This is not enough to make an attribution to a smith, be it Kaneuji or any other kaji. There are so many factors that must be taken into account in kantei, and their combinations are numerous. It is bewildering even for shinsa members
However, it is great that you want to share your sword and your opinion on this Forum, because that's what people do here - try to help. Also, your enthusiasm is also a very good thing, just don't get disheartened when your sword turns out to be something less then a masterpiece (as it most likely will).
It simply takes a bit more learning to make attributions, especially such bold ones, OK? :D
Please don't take offence :-)
I wish you luck with the sword, it is a nice find, as Brian said :-)