Bugyotsuji Posted August 13, 2021 Report Posted August 13, 2021 Not enough material to judge by. The whole blade will probably tell more than one short signature of the 40 or so Sukesada smiths. Quote
lonely panet Posted August 13, 2021 Report Posted August 13, 2021 It looks very poor in the way its cut. And not typical of that you see on either sue koto or early shinto. But what would i know, i could be talking out my ass 4 1 1 Quote
Johnbull Posted August 13, 2021 Author Report Posted August 13, 2021 More pics, it's in need of polish. Approx c1680? Quote
Mark S. Posted August 13, 2021 Report Posted August 13, 2021 I would want to see more pics of kissaki area. Maybe angle of picture? Looks very damaged /mis-shaped? Not sure if it could be repaired/re-shaped during polish? Quote
Stephen Posted August 13, 2021 Report Posted August 13, 2021 Im afraid your going to get the same answer here as Facebook. Amateur cut gimei, nakagos not even bizen. I wouldn't put it older than 1800s 3 Quote
Johnbull Posted August 13, 2021 Author Report Posted August 13, 2021 Thank you all, I will get additional pictures & add. Quote
Soshin Posted August 21, 2021 Report Posted August 21, 2021 (edited) Hello John, I generally do not reply and refence something I am selling on the general discussion form, but I think it would be helpful and informative to the members of NMB. I have a Shinto Era Osafune Sukesada wakizashi that is signed and dated with NBTHK Hozon papers up on my business website for sale here: Antique Japanese Short Sword (Wakizashi) by Sukesada | Rain Dragon Fine Art (raindragonfineartandantiques.com). Comparing your sword to my sword art polish or not I would need to agree with Hamfish, Stephen, and others assessment. Edited August 21, 2021 by Soshin Added additional information and fixed typos. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.