Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Bruce the Menuki - is saw this kind of menuki but i didn't remember were. Also the Kabutogane looks like something is see before. 

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Here is a follow on from the last photos posted of this sword. I finally got it sent over from aus to the uk. I got to the tang and there seems to be some markings on it that looks like mihara ミハラ I cleaned off some of the cosomoline.

I’ll be keeping it on my mantle as a family heirloom. Thought I would post here to see some opinions on it 

899F5F78-C0E1-4732-86CA-521884C9DB2E.jpeg

E9204353-EECA-42DD-97F3-2A1EC888D1C2.jpeg

298AD260-9880-4B91-A422-32AEEB67AD8C.jpeg

47059E88-AB9D-46EC-9948-D72F620C5B01.jpeg

Posted
1 hour ago, Johnaturalstones said:

Here is a follow on from the last photos posted of this sword. I finally got it sent over from aus to the uk. I got to the tang and there seems to be some markings on it that looks like mihara ミハラ I cleaned off some of the cosomoline.

I’ll be keeping it on my mantle as a family heirloom. Thought I would post here to see some opinions on it 

 

 

 

47059E88-AB9D-46EC-9948-D72F620C5B01.jpeg

I think it's ジヤワ Java sword.

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
  • 3 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 7 months later...
Posted

Thanks to @John C for bringing this to our attention.  A craigslist sale posted HERE.  What's unique is the blue Seki approval sticker on the saya.  The seller says the blade and saya are mismatched because the chuso does not line up with the saya.  

 

I personally say this - We believe the saya with these labels are late war.  We also think "island swords" are late war.  Wouldn't the stickered saya be a logical thing to see on a late-war blade?  To me, they support each other in legitamacy.  

 

 

00B0B_ipCytg7JMHn_0jT0dX_600x450.jpg

00e0e_80lg6mCuWoO_0CI07C_600x450.jpg

00O0O_1biKm8clTGu_0f80oE_600x450.jpg

00R0R_9MSqipoxTYL_0db0pO_600x450.jpg

00W0W_jjYLXR1RyJI_0lD0cS_600x450.jpg

00101_5CsovyMxLRz_0pu0da_600x450.jpg

00707_gGHOpE03kdB_0r50t2_600x450.jpg

Posted

Just noticed the photos of the late war Yoshinao went dead.  I must have posted photo links rather than the actual photos.  Good reason to always post photos, not links!  Here's the photos from my file:

 

s-l1600(8).thumb.jpg.221742f78abb734dd3353be63dc86602.jpgs-l1600.thumb.jpg.4635a56a2646f84226214ee7b833960b.jpg

s-l1600(2).thumb.jpg.bd675c26230c69bea3bc07a933d67251.jpgs-l1600(4).thumb.jpg.dcf486accb2107937eeb26bd89bc85e4.jpgs-l1600(5).thumb.jpg.0d117c8e7b8bc9f227046d2383363daa.jpg

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 11/29/2022 at 8:23 PM, John C said:

 

@BANGBANGSAN

 

I know we have another thread with several of these, but I cannot find it.  I've been filing these as "Manchurian".  This seller is claiming them to be Sumatran.  I think they are wrong and we are right about them, but it is found AT THIS AUCTION

 

img.axd?id=7971791287&wid=&rwl=false&p=&ext=&w=1600&h=1200&t=&lp=&c=true&wt=false&checksum=dQNTX6L7YJhLfvJ6vsBAufs9XmnNjvcmimg.axd?id=7971791258&wid=&rwl=false&p=&ext=&w=1600&h=1200&t=&lp=&c=true&wt=false&checksum=dQNTX6L7YJhkjjJ4PMACFDyKCGbsucTa

img.axd?id=7966855726&wid=&rwl=false&p=&ext=&w=1600&h=1200&t=&lp=&c=true&wt=false&checksum=jU54YMjEx8RCGpXeVtbS7ASUk4XE521kimg.axd?id=7966855663&wid=&rwl=false&p=&ext=&w=1600&h=1200&t=&lp=&c=true&wt=false&checksum=5DR5jOomOmVM4UBIHBg5HSIy7rB28xbW

img.axd?id=7966855477&wid=&rwl=false&p=&ext=&w=1600&h=1200&t=&lp=&c=true&wt=false&checksum=lM6vqSwFcD4gJ7CYp6uktNdJd2OMlQseimg.axd?id=7966855425&wid=&rwl=false&p=&ext=&w=1600&h=1200&t=&lp=&c=true&wt=false&checksum=lM6vqSwFcD58kTEVGpF6ZAkyJak0uiWO

Posted
1 hour ago, Bruce Pennington said:

 

@BANGBANGSAN

 

I know we have another thread with several of these, but I cannot find it.  I've been filing these as "Manchurian".  This seller is claiming them to be Sumatran.  I think they are wrong and we are right about them, but it is found AT THIS AUCTION

 

 

 

 

The kanji on the tang is Chinese "順“, not  Indonesian。

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 4 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Thanks, Seth!  No numbers or stamps on the blade, either under the habaki or just outside of it?  I ask because I have 2 on file with similar shaped tsuba, and they have a kanji + numbers just outside the habaki.

 

How about a full length shot?

  • 1 year later...
Posted

@Spartan117

Nice example, Alexis, thanks for posting.  Definitely the Chinese plum rather than a Japanese sakura (cherry blossom).  If you've read this whole thread, then you know as much as we do.  Predominant theory is made in occupied areas for collaborating troops.

  • Love 1
Posted

Thank you @Bruce Pennington ive bought this recently and was concerned that it was a fake. But im totally okay if its a genuine Chinese war version of the type 98.  Ive read the whole thread and you seemed very knowledgeable so i figured id tag you directly. I probably will post full photos and make a new thread to gather more information. But it is indeed an obscure sword.

Posted

Also does the blade look consistent with a genuine machined sword of the era? Ive tested it to see if its magnetic also checked it with cold blue to see if it was genuine carbon steel. And both check out to be consistent with the material at the time 

Posted
9 hours ago, Spartan117 said:

does the blade look consistent with a genuine machined sword of the era?

Yes, it matches all the others I've seen.  They appeared to make the blades out of a single steel, probably tempered (?), but no hamon.  Which, unfortunately, is the same way the modern fakers have made them, which makes it quite difficult to separate the fakes from the wartime swords made by occupied peoples.

Posted

There is a Hamon. If its the wavy line that goes along lower part of the blade, then yes it has one. Its rather skinny and faint. Its included in the photos it may easy to miss. Its not a full picture so sorry for not including a full pic. From what i can explain it the waves are definitely a unique pattern throughout 

  • Like 1
  • 5 months later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Hey @Bruce Pennington and others. I picked up another tonight. I was wanting some thoughts on it. The seller claimed it was a reproduction. I wasn’t sure if it was a known variant. 

 

It appears to be a late war or emergency issue variant. 

 

Thanks in advance to all for your thoughts on this one. 

IMG_0512.jpeg

IMG_0513.jpeg

IMG_0515.jpeg

IMG_0514.jpeg

IMG_0518.jpeg

IMG_0517.jpeg

IMG_0516.jpeg

IMG_0521.jpeg

IMG_0520.jpeg

IMG_0519.jpeg

IMG_0522.jpeg

Posted
1 minute ago, Kiipu said:

That kind of ito wrap was used on some of the occupation swords from Indonesia

Do you think this is one such sword?

Posted

Well shoot!  Now that you say that, I had to re-look, and how about that tsuba?!  It's the 'pine tree' tsuba @IJASWORDS and @Bruno brought to light:

image.jpeg.d080fa66b1e6c27d4ec7276f233a1cba.jpeg

 

What initially bothered me was the Like-New canvas cover, then the wrap, then the like-new nakago with wavering shinogi.  But now, with this tsuba, it very well could be late-war, made in Manchuria or other areas.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm not super up-to-date on late war occupation swords. Thoughts on the lack of seppa?
 

The leather on the saya cover with shiny hanger and buckel does not look old enough to me, but I suppose they could have been cleaned...
Best,
-Sam

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...