Jon MB Posted October 14, 2017 Report Posted October 14, 2017 Hello All, Here is a Tanto, signed 'Kagemitsu'. Not sure if I posted it before.. Bought it in a flea market in Asia more than 10 years ago...USD 30. I think it was captured by Soviet forces in 1945. Do we like it? Should I have it polished? Notice problem with boshi, I think it can be recovered. Bizen Kagemitsu? Thank for your help, all comments welcomed. Blade:25.5 cm (10") Total: 37 cm (14.5") Quote
Marius Posted October 14, 2017 Report Posted October 14, 2017 Jon, Yes, Bizen or so it looks. Kagemitsu? Remains to be seen. People with a good meikan can help you. Problem with boshi? You mean kissaki - the tip is broken, but a polisher can fix that. Make sure there is boshi (hamon in the kissaki), otherwise polishing would not make sense. The koshirae is late, but nice. Excellent purchase, well done! 1 Quote
Jon MB Posted October 14, 2017 Author Report Posted October 14, 2017 Thanks Marius! Yes, kissaki, sorry. Hard to say with boshi, I think it's ok. Quote
nagamaki - Franco Posted October 14, 2017 Report Posted October 14, 2017 thoughts, 1. this tanto is trying to be old, old, imo, however, I believe that I'm seeing slight uchi-zori and if so, plus shape, hints at only old copy of old, old, muromachi quite possible. 2. Kagemitsu, keep in mind that although the mei might be valid, elgible for hozon paper, this very well could be a mass produced signed school piece = lower quality. 3. polish, while perhaps tempting because of price per inch, that's still cost per inch that could go towards a more promising piece. 4. before taking further steps, it's always wise to understand exactly what you have and more importantly don't have and might end up with, consult a good polisher. 2 Quote
J Reid Posted October 14, 2017 Report Posted October 14, 2017 It may be the lighting.. but in pic #9 I can make out a healthy temper in kissaki. Quote
lonely panet Posted October 14, 2017 Report Posted October 14, 2017 great buy the money spent, to me it reminds me of sue koto yorodoshi, except its abit longer then normal. shape and thickness is classsic osafune kiyomitsu, sukesada etc maybe the mei is abit on the largish side for normal sue osafune work of the time. mabe some closeups of the JI just around the habaki area please. iMHO the mei is funny 1 Quote
Ken-Hawaii Posted October 14, 2017 Report Posted October 14, 2017 I think you may have gotten very lucky, Jon. From what I can see of the hamon, that sure looks like his characteristic kataochi gunome, & there were few other tosho who made that pattern. I also see one mei in Markus Sesko's e-Koto Meikan that's darn close to the one on your nakago. Keep your fingers crossed, but you may have a real winner! Woody did an excellent job of polishing my Kagemitsu, BTW. Good luck! Ken 2 Quote
Jon MB Posted October 14, 2017 Author Report Posted October 14, 2017 Thanks for the comments guys! Two more pics.....photographing blades is just as hard as people always say it is... Quote
ROKUJURO Posted October 15, 2017 Report Posted October 15, 2017 Jon,keep this one healthy and never (ever) touch a blade with your bare hands! Quote
Jon MB Posted October 15, 2017 Author Report Posted October 15, 2017 ok (Note: Rokojuro pointed out my thumb was somewhere threatening to ruin history, so I removed it). (The section of the picture showing my thumb). Quote
Jon MB Posted October 15, 2017 Author Report Posted October 15, 2017 This came from Mongolia. Meaning 1939 Khalkhiingol capture, or 1945 Invasion of Manchuria capture. Mongolians sharpen their knives on the bottom of bowls, which has been done to this piece. Quote
J Reid Posted October 15, 2017 Report Posted October 15, 2017 Using ceramic bowls/ plates/ steels to hone Japanese chef knives is common.. but how can you tell for sure? I can't tell the difference between using my ceramic steel and my stones. Quote
J Reid Posted October 15, 2017 Report Posted October 15, 2017 Sorry to be clear the stones leave the "defined trail" on the edge, but when using a ceramic steel, or plate to hone I don't notice any change.. Quote
Jon MB Posted October 15, 2017 Author Report Posted October 15, 2017 Can't know for sure, but it's the cultural norm, never seen it done any other way there. I think pic 10 shows the effect of sharpening a bit. Mongolian knives (like the Chinese/ Tibetan /Manchu trousse sets with chopsticks) are considered good quality if they have silver fittings. The copper fittings to the koshirae here would likely have left the impression with Mongolians that this was not such a high quality knife. Quote
Gakusee Posted October 15, 2017 Report Posted October 15, 2017 Going back to the tanto....The mei herewith does not seem to correspond to the tight, compact mei of Nagamitsu’s son Bizen Osafune Kagemitsu, who worked in the 14th century. For the rest - the polish is not adequate to tell defining characteristics of hamon and hada. Good luck and enjoy it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.