hope I am not getting off topic. I went to the exhibition at the MET in NY a while back that showed some great swords. National Treasures, JuBi etc. Many of them attained these levels based on their historical importance not based on their inherent qualities. While all the swords were interesting, most were fantastic, but a few did not excite me as I had expected. Maybe I have an untrained eye but I commented to a friend that a few of them I would have passed by if I saw them (just the blade with no information laying on a table) at a show priced at $5k. I think some of the swords were prized more for the history than the actual blade. My opinion is that if I am selling a blade I want a shoshin "big name" as it will bring the highest price, but if I am going to own it long term and enjoy its beauty and workmanship I want a great work by any smith, even low ranking, not a tired mediocre blade by a "big name" smith.