Jump to content

John C

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,509

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Everything posted by John C

  1. John C
    I've never seen a seme-gane that shape before. John C.
  2. John C
    Nick: Are the other parts marked with a number 34 or 43? John C.
  3. John C
    Nick: It might seem silly, but wait until a day when the humidity is really low. The wood should shrink a bit and may slide out. John C.
  4. John C

    help identify sword

    John C replied to jaxmon's topic in Nihonto

    Hello: I'm not one of the translators so take with a grain of salt but I think it reads Ando Kanemoto saku kore. WW2 smith. Looks like some civilian fittings have been added. John C.
  5. John C
    Vincent: I agree with the above, that it is a greatly shortened blade. As Brian noted, look for turnback at the kissaki. The reason it is an issue, is because unless the blade is re-hardened, the tip is now being shaped into soft steel. This makes it an ineffective weapon. Just FYI. John C.
  6. John C
    Easy: Got to forums - NMB general Japanese discussion - Translation assistance. Then start a new topic with your request. John C.
  7. John C
    We have some miracle workers on NMB!! John C.
  8. John C
    Definitely leaning toward a name now with the third kanji. It's not a lot of info about the sword, but it would be cool to find out. You can post that last pic over on the translation forum and see if anyone can figure it out. John C.
  9. John C
    Vincent: Just my opinion, but it seems to be a reproduction. Notice the shape of the nakago is off; the shape of the kissaki is off; and the ha machi and mune machi do not line up. In any case, someone has taken a grinder to it to clean off the rust. Could be Japanese, though it has been treated roughly. John C.
  10. John C
    Ah. Please forgive my ignorance. I don't own Dawson or F&G but should have asked about that first. No need to duplicate what's already out there. John C.
  11. John C
    I wouldn't clean the markings off. You may also damage the end of the tsuka in the process if it swells or chips. The first set of marks looks like the number 3; can't tell what the other one is. It could also be a name (the number 3 is San, which could be the start of a name). John C.
  12. John C
    Looks a bit like someone took some metal polish to it. John C.
  13. John C
    @Bruce Pennington I saw these marks on a Meiji period artillery sword. Would you want to expand the Stamp doc to include items like this and marks on bayonets or just focus on Gunto? John C.
  14. John C
    Joel: It looks as if the tsuka has assembly numbers (or an assembler name) on the end of the tsuka. That suggests to me that it is ww2 era? John C.
  15. John C
    I suppose another question may be does the softer hada of the wak you are looking at have enough room for the horimono you are looking at? I guess that could be adjusted by the carver. In addition, you may run into issues just under the surface carving into a blade with unknown characteristics. Just thinking out loud... John C.
  16. John C
    Looks right. You'll notice the tsuka is marked with what looks like a + rather than a - for the one. I have seen this before; probably so they did not confuse the 1 3 with a 4. I have also seen them use the + or x in place of a 0. John C.
  17. John C
    Bruno: Not sure if it is the case here, however I know some other smiths would include their age at the time they made the blade. Does that fit in with the date? John C.
  18. John C
    Google translate has the top right circled area as "registration number." John C.
  19. John C
    Trystan: This is one of the things that made me curious. Typically, it seems, the numbers were not added together - just written down. For 58, I would not expect a bunch of x's added together; instead I would expect just the / for 5 and the /III for 8. Was it common for the numbers to have been added? John C.
  20. John C

    Large tsuba sale

    John C replied to kissakai's topic in Tsuba

    Thank you. I'll take a look. Johnn C.
  21. John C
    I don't think it is too strange to have the Toyokawa inspection stamp on a Tenshozan factory blade. The army PX contract went through Mr. Yao at Tenshozan, since they were the only factory allowed to continue to "manufacture" blades, however the blades could have still been inspected and assembled at Toyokawa arsenal. We just need more information on how the swords were actually produced. John C.
  22. John C
    The cutting of the nakago could just be for the sake of expediency. They may have been under pressure to fulfill the contract so they could not only save time by not finishing the nakago, but also reduce the need to fit the tsuka. That has been my impression as well. Makes sense to use the ones left over then streamline the process to fulfill the contract. John C.
  23. John C

    Large tsuba sale

    John C replied to kissakai's topic in Tsuba

    @kissakai Grev: Do you know if any of your tsuba have a small wakizashi sized nakago-ana (21mm x 7mm mune end)? Thanks, John C.
  24. John C
    John: How many ww2 Generals' swords were produced (i.e., how many generals were there)? Although I suspect most survived in one form or another, I can't imagine the availability is too great. Just curious, John C.
  25. John C
    A follow-up question: Do we know whether or not these swords were left over stock or were manufactured post war? One document mentions "Since these swords were made after the end of the war, however, they are not war trophies." And another document uses the word "manufactured." It is unclear, however, if these documents are referring to the actual manufacturing of the blades themselves or just the assembly of existing blades into swords. Do we have anything definitive on that? John C.
×
×
  • Create New...