Bugyotsuji

This is on a scroll held by a Kuge 公家 courtier (?), a standing ivory Okimono. Can anyone read it? (He seems to be holding a branch of cherry blossom? in his left hand) http://netsuke.websitetoolbox.com/file?id=1402987 http://netsuke.websitetoolbox.com/post/ ... ostcount=6

One can also look at the other end and consider the Azuchi-Momoyama period as being the Oda Nobunaga - Toyotomi Hideyoshi period, a time when Japan started to really draw together under a quick succession of strong leaders. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azuchi%E2% ... ama_period If Momoyama was named after Hideyoshi's Momoyama castle built on the hill with Momo orchards growing there, then Momo, heart, Inome designs in artifacts and architecture come to symbolize that era, a gorgeous flourishing time after the dark ages of Muromachi...

Justin, I used a bone spatula to prise off the loose rust flakes and a damp towel to mop off the rust dust. Later, when dry, I applied olive oil and then rubbed repeatedly with a soft linen cloth. Now I am tempted to go back and use Ian's bubbling cauldron mix... AU60, Luc, you are quite right about the odd placement of the shiten no byo! I never noticed. Strange. Will have a look to see if I can get a shot of the inside of the koshimaki. The inside has been relined. The underneath of the very thin mabisashi is moonscape tetsu sabiji.

Just for fun here are two matching Kutani-ware Tokkuri I found not too long ago. I do not think they are very old, but I like the design of the travelling samurai group. Hard to photo all the way round, so I allowed one to pick up where the other left off.

Recently I part-purchased part-swapped a battered and rusty Kabuto for use in matchlock displays. (The one I had was an Edo adaptation of a Zunari helmet, covering the steel with black urushi and neri to give the impression of 32 ken suji. It was pretty to look at but a bit small and did not really pass the age test.) This recent purchase is either a pre-teppo Muromachi Ushiro-kachiyama (Akoda style) hachi, or an Edo replica. Which, I wonder? The person who sold it to me said that although the shikoro looks to be a later addition, the hachi itself is quite light and made of extremely thin plates, indicating an ignorance of guns and bullets. In addition it has Higaki around it. I can attest to the thinness of the steel. While cleaning it I knocked a hole through the mabisashi. The oval flake of iron is thinner than my little finger nail. The photos below show the helmet after someone else's cleanup job, and then following criticism of its dry and listless look, after my clean.

This exhibition looks impressive. Thanks for the link.

Great drawings. A friend has a huge collection of Kawari kabuto, and over a hundred menpo unusual in one way or another..

Mine is somewhat similar. An expert on armour told me it was probably made around the end of Momoyama, beginning of Edo, but he was also using the narrowness of the shikoro to guide him. People tend to call pointed ones with upright sections "Toppai" (pronounced 'top pie'), and they were popularly imitated into Edo, according to Sasama Sensei.

Well, the first coins minted in 1668 had almost that exact design on them, but the slight differences over the years are only noticeable once they've been pointed out. Further mintings took place in 1700, 1708 and 1714, and then the design on the back starts to change.... and that's where I lose the plot! :lol: Your coin may be cheap but it's a pretty example. I carry a few in a coin purse just to remind me of how they might have looked when they really did rub against each other.

Well, what else do you know about it? Notice the rim is quite wide. What is written on the frame? What did the dealer tell you? Can you post a shot of the back as that sometimes proves something, such as the shape of the 文? I have just spent half an hour looking at seven pages of Kan Ei Tsu Ho and I'm feeling a bit dizzy.

It sounds as though you are slightly ahead of where I am, Chris! The Bun is actually read Mon for coins; it means it is a single cash coin, "Ichi Mon Sen" 2.3cm in diameter. The ones with waves were 4-Mon coins, 2.8 cm across. Single Mon Kan-ei-tsu-ho were minted from 1636 till 1862. Yon Mon Sen were minted from 1768 onwards in either copper or brass. Cash coins were used for everyday purchases; you could have your treasured gold or silver blobs weighed at special exchanges in order to get bags of such everyday money, I understand. As to books, I started reading Japanese material but the depth of detail was bewildering so I gave up. The width of the edging tells something. The style of the Kanji strokes may determine both the date and the value today. Good luck! Oops, I have just opened Koichi San's link above! Read that first!!!

Does the back have waves on it, or 文?

Overpolished is my guess too: a pity. Agree with Alan here.

Unusual shell design. As to quality, I'd say very good. Love the Cho-tsugai, - butterfly hinges.

Wonderful. Congratulations on making it all come together.

The horsey word "Shiode" is how they ended up being pronounced, but originally they were shi-ho = four directions + te = hands (handles). Unusual design for Menuki, as Ian says.

View of the locking glass viewing cases from the other end. (For swords and Tosogu.)

Thanks all for the words of encouragement. Here is the original thread from 4 years ago when my photography skills were obviously lacking. Silver sun on one side (now black) and red sun on the other. One of the bamboo ribs is split, and the black paperwork is very fragile. viewtopic.php?f=15&t=4144&p=31219&hilit=tessen#p31219

My Tessen is old but in pretty bad condition. It does not have the lovely silver inlay of Ron's but it does have a Mei cut in the iron. Is it worth the price of restoration? Part of me says yes, for purely historical reasons, but it would be altruism towards the past, a sense of responsibility to stop or slow further degradation. Certainly a nice object to have in one's collection.

Glad you enjoyed them Jan. Spent the evening framing a couple of Ukiyo-e to take tomorrow. Should I take my last hold-out guns or not? Hmmm...

Oh, what the hell, a couple more from the first day for luck! And these are before the swords and tsuba... (interestingly I was struck by how some of the modern work being shown by these young and upcoming artists can be just as good in its own right as anything produced centuries ago. Talent is talent. Genius is genius. Such work transcends time and place.)

Yes, it is as if each piece has been chosen carefully for some unusual but unspoken quality. Here are some closer shots of Tanegashima peripherals for Jan who was asking. The first shot is the first day... and the rest are from the second day. (Tomorrow I will be doing another rearrangement, despite the approaching typhoon... :lol: )

Took over 100 low-density photos. Here are a few for general feeling.

The exploded section for touch and handling both a sword and a matchlock. Two shots of the overall non-swords/tsuba section on Day 2.

Under thick glass, so hard to get a clear shot.