Grey Doffin

Hi Gary, On your sword, the answer is no. No possible way to know for whom the sword was made. What's more, most likely the sword wasn't made for any specific customer. It was made and sold/given/whatever to whoever happened by. "Kin Saku" (respectfully made), as written on your sword, is something you see from time to time. It doesn't necessarily mean anything is special about the blade. Sometimes, on older, traditional Samurai swords there is an inscription stating who the customer/patron was. This is fairly uncommon. Can't remember ever seeing a WWII era sword with this kind of inscription. Grey

Thanks; now I don't feel so bad about not being able to make sense of the mei. And thanks to all who helped. Grey

That's Ko-Bizen Masamune, not Soshu Masamune. Grey

Hi guys, I'm indexing a book with some very obscure smiths. Would someone be so kind as to translate this mei so I know who to index? Thanks, Grey

Gary, Gimei means fake signature. Guys, I've had some correspondence with Gary about his blade. Just to make clear what he's asking about: his sword is signed "Toto Ju Nin Ikkansai Kunimori Kin Saku". My understanding is that Kunimori is a signature Yasukuni Yasuhiro used when he wasn't working at the shrine and also after the war. Gary is trying to learn the value of his sword. Anyone know what they go for without the Yasukuni mei? Grey

This person who has sharpened Japanese swords before, who will remove the grinder marks from your sword, is he a properly trained polisher or something else? This sword may be salvageable and it might be worth the expense of the salvage, but if the work is attempted by anyone other than a properly trained polisher you'll be wasting your money and possibly destroying the blade. Grey

And it's not a sure thing that the saya will fit either. Like Todd said, almost impossible to find a rig to fit your blade even if you can try it on. Online by way of photos and measurements, no chance. Grey

The blade is much older than WWII; no doubt about that. I was commenting on the hand writing, nothing more. Grey

Nice looking sword and a good price if real, but I've never seen those papers before. Anyone know which organization issued them? Grey

The signature reminds me of Gunto signatures; it would look perfectly at home on an oil tempered blade from WWII. It looks, also, as if some rust has been removed inside and around the Kanji. Grey

Hi Mickey, Can't be sure from the pictures but maybe between $500 and $750 would be a likely final value on ebay or at a gun/militaria show. Anyone agree or not? Grey

Look at the work, not the signature. While there may be quite a few smiths with the same signature, for each of them, it the signature is legit, the work must match what he did. In an instance like this even the shinsa team might just paper the blade to the smith, without designating a particular smith out of that group. Darcy, How are you feeling? That must have been one painful operation. Grey

100% fake. Grey

Katana start at 2 shaku from the tip back to the notch at the back in a straight line. 2 shaku = 23.86" or 60.60cm. This measurement is called nagasa in Japanese. Grey

Thanks Ted. There is no evidence of any obscured characters above or below the 7, and the condition of this tsuba is good enough that I'd see something if that were the case. I agree with something shu and Mune; I thought of Myochin too. One thing I really like about this tsuba is the hammer work. Notice how the marks radiate out? Amida yasuri done with a hammer, not a file or chisel. Grey

Bugman This is what you're up against. This sword might be Koto, likely late Koto rather than early or mid Koto. This was a time of constant warfare in Japan, a time when there was great need for lots of weaponry. Swords were made by the bucketful; some of them were great pieces by great smiths but the majority weren't. If you get this polished and find out later that it is one of the mass produced blades of late Koto times, especially if it is a wakizashi and being unsigned, it will be worth much less than what you paid to have it polished and all you will have learned is to be more careful with your money next time. You need to have a better idea of its value, monetary and artistic, before you decide to throw money at it. A Kendo instructor isn't necessarily an authority on sword quality; he might know what he's talking about or he might know next to nothing. Show it to someone better able to advise you, a polisher at a Japanese sword show for example, before going further. Grey

No, just one. Looks like 7 to me. After I posted this I got to wondering if this tsuba hadn't been talked about on NMB before. I have faint recollection of a 7 on a tsuba discussion before. Grey

Hi guys, Do any of you know why this tsuba has the number 7 (shichi) on the seppa dai? Grey

Soot with tape and pressure sensitive paper don't work very well to reliable draw the hamon and hataraki either. Grey

I haven't seen the contact sensitive paper for quite a few years now. Wasn't it some sort of medical device paper? EKG? But again, there is no reason to look for it. Real oshigata are easy! And fun and informative. You notice things about a sword when you take the time to do oshigata that you wouldn't see otherwise. Grey

I just received a tsuba in the mail that had been shipped in its box. Lucky for me and the tsuba it was wrapped in paper that protected it from serious damage. The picture below shows why you never want to transport tsuba in boxes. Grey

Not all swords have rayskin under the wrap. The mounts on your sword are lower quality and no rayskin was used. It isn't possible for any of us to tell you who made the sword without having it in hand, and even then probably not. What is the length of the cutting edge? If less than 24" it is an unsigned wakizashi in low end mounts, which doesn't point to anything great. Of course, any level of blade can be found in any level of mounts so you can't automatically assume the blade isn't worth a polish just from the mounts, but chances are not in its favor. I think you should put a very light coat of good machine oil on the polished portion (not the tang) of the blade, and otherwise let it be for now. If you're going to get serious about Japanese swords, in a few years after you learn much more, you can decide whether or not to get it polished. If you aren't going to get serious there's no reason to spend a couple thousand dollars on a polish you won't appreciate. Grey

Brian, My understanding, gained from those more knowledgeable than me, is that the soot will affect the nakago if left on, and that cleaning it off risks damage also. And like I said, there is no reason whatsoever to do a soot and tape oshigata. Is saving yourself 5 to 10 minutes with an ink stone worth the risk you might damage the sword? Grey

Not what you asked about but I notice that you've made a soot and tape oshigata. This isn't a good idea. The soot can alter the patina of the nakago, and if you clean off the soot you're cleaning the nakago which can alter the patina of the nakago. You want never to alter the nakago. Traditional oshigata, made with thin paper and ink stone, does a better job, isn't terribly difficult or time consuming, and won't damage the sword. Do yourself and your swords a favor and try it. Grey

A 3 legged bird? Grey