Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Scogg said:

@Vampyres, I’ve merged your newly created topics to this old one again. Please reply to this ongoing topic, instead of creating new topics

I have cleaned the blade to see the hamon line but I have not touch the tang is that bad or good 

Posted

I can see why that pit looked like a Seki stamp in the original photos, but with the better lighting, I see that it is not.  I am often the first to see stamps that aren't there! Ha!

 

John,

You didn't say how you cleaned, but, yes you are correct in not cleaning the nakago (tang).  Please never do that.  If there is orange, active rust, we want to stop that, but not clean it.  

 

Here is a good page about blade care: Japanese Sword Care - Japaneseswordindex.com

Posted

And the sword was out of polish wen I got And it was covered in rust because it was in someone's article or basement or loft for 45 years that is what the seller said about the man who he got it off 

Posted
23 hours ago, Bruce Pennington said:

John sent me a couple extra photos, but unfortunately, there weren't any other kanji (or stamps) that could be seen.

 

Thoughts - On the one hand, I looked over my Kanesada blades on file from WWII.  They all used the same style file marks as this one, and 2 or 3 had similar kanji for Kanesada.

On the other hand, and I'll say right up front that I don't study nihonto, but one of the signs I've seen of age is the cutting edge machi (name for that, I don't remember) starts to disappear after too many polishings, as does the hamon.  This one looks that way to me, implying age.

 

But that's the best I have on this one. 

hamachi? and ubu-ba as fresh never polished hamachi near habaki. 

Posted (edited)

If nakago wasn't altered what about inconsistent yasurime? I wonder could this be forgery or muromachi blade repurposed for gunto fittings by machi okuri.

Funniest option would it be if this is originally Bizen sword with fake Mino Seki signature. 

Edited by Rawa
Posted

John,

a basic rule of thumb never clean the tang , sometimes it is acceptable to remove active rust on the tang , but you really need to know what you are doing first .

 

looking at the tang again  , it could be signed No-Shu Ju Kanesada saku ? which would mean it is a WW11 sword .

  • Like 1
Posted

Partly because it’s in a poor state of polish and condition. 
 

Different light and angles = different reflection and illumination 

  • Like 1
  • Wow 1
Posted

That is a wise decision. 
 

Excluding old “family” swords, and Gendaito; many WW2 swords, and especially machine-made blades and showato; are simply relics of their time and the war. Their value and collectibility is associated with their history, and there’s a level of acceptable condition issues.

 

People in the militaria collecting world will see more value and intrigue in an item that shows some wear and tear, and will look at a “clean” or “pristine” item with scrutiny and skepticism. 
 

Nobody likes to see evidence of modern alterations on vintage or antique items or art. 

Best to leave it as-is.

Best of luck, 

-Sam 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...