Type 95 Correct Serial Number Range?

[John C]

Hello:

I recently picked up a type 95 NCO. From the research I have done here and on Warrelics, it all looks correct for a pattern 2 (aluminum handle, brass tsuba [9mm], top latch, olive green steel scabbard). The top nut and bolt may be replacements. The marks are consistent with a pattern 2 (Tokyo 1st). The problem, if it is one, is the serial number range. I read that the 4th pattern serial number range ends around 132k. Mine is a pattern 2 at 139k.

Were the different patterns made concurrently? Or is the serial number range as we know it somewhat flexible? 

I'm pretty sure the sword is legit, however the serial number is throwing me off a little bit.

Regards,

John C.

[robinalexander]

Hello John from the two pictures posted, I agree the sword is legit.

 

To your question of numbering time line for different arsenals @Stegel or @Shamsy or other 95 buffs may be able to add something.

 

[Stegel]

Nice original example.

This one has the correct Fuchs stamps with the Tokyo star logo, instead of the Kokura 4 cannonballs.

Tokyo produced the top lock Pattern 2(brass tsuba)and pattern 3(steel tsuba) until the end of the war.

After the Administration change of Arsenals from Kokura, Nagoya produced the side latched models only. That is pattern 4 (Aluminium handle) and pattern 5. (Wood handle) .

The Admin change occurred in 1942, so both Arsenals were producing different model swords from this time on.

This sword was produced early 1943 IMO.  
 

[John C]

Okay. Thank you. I had the date pegged between June 1939 (handle change from copper to aluminum) and April 1941 (tsuba change from brass to steel). But the serial number in the 100k range didn't make sense. The 1943 date makes much more sense relative to the serial number range.

I appreciate it.

Quick edit: forgot to mention it also has matching serial number steel scabbard.

John C.

[Smee78]

How about some more pictures of your new addition?