Bruce Pennington Posted June 20 Author Report Posted June 20 Just now, Scogg said: could have been cleaned... Or a recently made cover. Seth, what do you see with the cover in hand? Does it appear to have any age? 1 Quote
Bruno Posted June 20 Report Posted June 20 Yes this tsuba is sometimes mounted on "civilian gunto". If identical to yours, at least the tsuba is genuine. 1 1 Quote
Kiipu Posted June 20 Report Posted June 20 Can you post some pictures of the scabbard without the protective cover? Also a picture of the scabbard throat would help as well. Quote
Kiipu Posted June 20 Report Posted June 20 4 hours ago, Matsunoki said: Do you think this is one such sword? Need more information to make a determination. The link below shows the ito wrap used on some of the Indonesian made swords. Hope this helps. Identification help 1 Quote
MeijiVet_88 Posted June 22 Report Posted June 22 (edited) On 6/20/2026 at 9:07 AM, Kiipu said: Can you post some pictures of the scabbard without the protective cover? Also a picture of the scabbard throat would help as well. Wow, wow, wow! This is fun to research together. Thank you all for the continued research and discussion on this piece. I referenced Fuller’s and Dawson’s books before purchasing it, and it appeared to be consistent with the few known occupation variants, though I wasn’t, and I’m still not entirely certain. This bit about the Tsuba that's really good to understand. I knew about the flower type for civilian Guntō but not the tree. Once it arrives from Japan, I’ll be happy to provide additional photographs; no issues there. For the price of it plus shipping, it was pocket change. I actually felt it was a worthwhile gamble even if it ultimately turns out not to be genuine. Edited June 22 by Grimmdarkspire 2 Quote
John C Posted June 22 Report Posted June 22 52 minutes ago, Grimmdarkspire said: Once it arrives from Japan, A military sword from Japan? It could be an island-made sword from ww2. If so, there could be a reason it was labeled as reproduction. John C. Quote
MeijiVet_88 Posted June 25 Report Posted June 25 On 6/20/2026 at 9:07 AM, Kiipu said: Can you post some pictures of the scabbard without the protective cover? Also a picture of the scabbard throat would help Just received this item in hand. Now that I have it in hand, I’d appreciate some opinions from those with more experience. The blade appears to be a low-quality steel alloy with only a light magnetic pull. The sword overall shows age, use, and the same old wood/mildew smell I’ve encountered on other wartime guntō. The hand-wrap also appears lightly used rather than recently replaced. The field cover appears newer, but when I began removing some stitching above the ashi it frayed quickly, so I stopped to avoid damaging it. Beneath the cover, the saya appears worn with a dark charcoal-colored lacquer over what looks to be an older reddish wood. Both seem strongly aged, with scratches, dents, and chips present throughout what I can observe under the cover. The fuchi also appears to have a poorly struck inspection mark consisting of a large circle with a medium circle and smaller circle inside it. In hand, it immediately reminded me of the Nagoya Army Arsenal mark, although it is difficult to capture clearly in photos and much more apparent in person. I’d be interested in hearing whether others see the same thing or if I’m misidentifying it. Given the possibility of an island-made or Indonesian-associated origin, could a local wood such as Merbau have been used for the saya? I’m not suggesting an identification, only exploring possibilities based on the wood’s appearance and color. Other than those observations, I’ll let the photos do the talking and would appreciate any insights. Quote
John C Posted June 25 Report Posted June 25 Not sure about the blade, however I find the cover unusual. The burlap seems new and the use of suede leather is very unusual. In addition, the end of the cover is not finished like I would expect (just cut and sewn rather than rounded). To me, the cover looks newer than ww2. And the steel barely passes the magnet test? That would concern me. Even an island sword would be real steel, albeit roughly processed. As for the mold smell, I find it common for things from Japan. I have multiple books from the 70s and 80s that all smell like that. Maybe the seller's estimate that it is a reproduction is correct. Just my two cents, of course. John C. 1 Quote
Brian Posted June 25 Report Posted June 25 If the blade is only very slightly magnetic, that tells you everything you need to know. I am not aware of any genuine sword that isn't made from steel and is properly magnetic. A display/wallhanger is the only option. Even "Island" swords would have been made from steel. Unless it's stainless, and clearly this one isn't, based on the rust and patina imho. 2 2 Quote
MeijiVet_88 Posted June 25 Report Posted June 25 Thanks for your observations and reminders. I’m embarrassed I made this mistake. I knew better and had references for the identified ones. I let myself get caught up in false hope of a new variant. Lesson learned. I’ll be better prepared next time. Thank you all again for your time on this one. Quote
Marcin Posted June 25 Report Posted June 25 5 hours ago, MeijiVet_88 said: Thanks for your observations and reminders. I’m embarrassed I made this mistake. I knew better and had references for the identified ones. I let myself get caught up in false hope of a new variant. Lesson learned. I’ll be better prepared next time. Thank you all again for your time on this one. If You purchased without onspectong in hand don’t be harsh for yourself. We have entire thread for emergency and last resort blades with written old opinions about these being fake. Quote
John C Posted June 25 Report Posted June 25 12 hours ago, MeijiVet_88 said: I’m embarrassed I made this mistake. Don't be. We have a saying in collecting: you pay for an item or you pay for an education. Either way, you get something out of it. John C. 2 3 Quote
MeijiVet_88 Posted yesterday at 06:39 AM Report Posted yesterday at 06:39 AM (edited) Hope everyone is doing well. Here’s another late war emergency piece that caught my eye, and I’m considering throwing a bid at it. I’d love to hear everyone’s thoughts on this one before I toss a bid at it. The symbol on the Nakago had been intriguing. No mark on the ricasso, though. Thanks Edited 23 hours ago by MeijiVet_88 Clarity on if this is a genuine late war emergency piece Quote
Ian B3HR2UH Posted yesterday at 07:00 AM Report Posted yesterday at 07:00 AM It's a junker and almost certainly not Japanese Save your money for something decent . 5 Quote
Kiipu Posted 14 hours ago Report Posted 14 hours ago We think these were made in China during the war. @BANGBANGSAN 1 Quote
Bruce Pennington Posted 10 hours ago Author Report Posted 10 hours ago Some folks like these, Grim. I'm with Thomas. Wartime sword, made in China (Manchuria) either for collaborators or Japanese. Probably last year of the war or so. 1 Quote
BANGBANGSAN Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 12 hours ago, Kiipu said: We think these were made in China during the war. @BANGBANGSAN Based on its features, this should be a simplified‑variant gunto for the puppet troops of North China. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.