Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This old mumei blade was found in shin-gunto mounts. Obviously over its lengthy life it has been re-mounted  a few times. 

Could any one hazard a guess as to its time of making? 

post-3858-0-63391600-1552454333_thumb.jpg

post-3858-0-40587200-1552454358_thumb.jpg

post-3858-0-52264400-1552454375_thumb.jpg

post-3858-0-33574500-1552454392_thumb.jpg

Posted

Dear Neil.

 

If the need to know is important then shinsa is the way to go.  If a consensus will do then can we have the dimensions please?  Whatever the outcome it's a nice find!

 

All the best.

Posted

Bizen, Muromachi.

 

It's casting a pretty wide net, I know, but... its all I got. 

 

And, it would look much nicer with a polish. 

 

That's it for my very obvious observations. It does look like a promising find. 

Must be on a streak. This is the 3rd promising find in the past week or so. 

Posted

Dear Neil.

 

Bearing in mind two things; first that we are doing this with very little to go on and from photographs of an out of polish sword, and second, that, "I know nothing!"

 

Given the length and that we could reasonably assume to gain about another 10cms if we imagine the sword before suriage then that would put it at about the right length for an early Muromachi blade. .  If this is so then we are in the late Nambokucho/Muromachi period as suggested by the previous owner.  Of course it is possible that more has been removed and that the grooves are a later addition in which case, as Chris suggests it might be earlier.  It certainly warrants showing to somebody knowledgeable in hand and probably a polish.

 

Looking forward to see where this goes.

 

All the best.

Posted

Shortend tachi

Dear Neil.

 

Bearing in mind two things; first that we are doing this with very little to go on and from photographs of an out of polish sword, and second, that, "I know nothing!"

 

Given the length and that we could reasonably assume to gain about another 10cms if we imagine the sword before suriage then that would put it at about the right length for an early Muromachi blade. . If this is so then we are in the late Nambokucho/Muromachi period as suggested by the previous owner. Of course it is possible that more has been removed and that the grooves are a later addition in which case, as Chris suggests it might be earlier. It certainly warrants showing to somebody knowledgeable in hand and probably a polish.

 

Looking forward to see where this goes.

 

All the best.

That was exactlywhat I thought, a late Nanbokucho, early Muromachi shortened during the Sengoku period.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...