Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Steve,

signatures are indeed easier to read.tip-up, but in this case, this might not be necessary, as the NAKAGO looks like a bad copy. Very probably a fake, more photos might confirm that. 

Posted

even with my in experienced eyes i knew they was something wrong........many thanks guys.

i must say when i ask for help its only because i am curious and i am not intent on buying.

once again many thanks

  • Like 1
Posted

I just bet you that this is a gaijin production. In the "old days" (say in the mid 1960s), there were fellows who practiced the deceptionary arts - with sources and skills that were not very good. This looks like something that was "signed" at that time.

Peter

PS This is not a confession!

Posted

Well...  could this be an Island made sword towards the end of Japanese occupation around Indonesia.  There are known genuine examples.

 

Consider, the yasurime look reasonably well done, the leather scabbard suggests age, a good fit and well-stitched.  The middle character is TA/DA as some swordsmiths rendered it.  The other characters are - well, who knows, but the TA/DA is intriguing.

 

Could I suggest we see more pics full length of the blade mounted and bare???

 

BaZZa.

Posted

HAHAHAHA - yair, I know, but this Esteemed Group has been asked an opinion and we need to respond kindly, never mind what I personally think of such things (shudder...)

 

BaZZa.

 

>> It doesn't matter how slow you go as long as you don't stop.

 

I like that.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...