Fuuten Posted October 28, 2016 Report Posted October 28, 2016 Hello everyone, I would appreciate some help on the following item. I'm inquiring because i own a tsuba that is identical, however its attributed to Umetada, i got the notion this daisho is attributed to Kaga Goto but i'm not sure, i would appreciate it if someone could confirm. Thank you in advance, Original listing: http://page13.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/r166759067 Quote
Curran Posted October 28, 2016 Report Posted October 28, 2016 The listing says 'Kaga Goto'. I've reached the point where my eyesight is not adequate to accurately see the last two characters on the attribution and confirm it. [Edit] One of the quiet wise gents with better eyesight than mine confirmed what what I suspected- The papers say 'Kaga Zogan'. I don't recall seeing 'Kaga Zogan' attribution before. Usually it has been Kaga Kinko or Kaga Goto. These papers are dated 2016, so this may reflect one of those changes I believe came to pass in 2014. 1 Quote
Fuuten Posted October 28, 2016 Author Report Posted October 28, 2016 Curran thank you very much (and the quiet wise gent alike). This is interesting, my tsuba has very old papers, so this might very well be a case like you described. Zogan could mean inlay as well correct? Perhaps someone could suggest what it could mean in the form a attribution? Thank you, Quote
Curran Posted October 28, 2016 Report Posted October 28, 2016 As to Kaga Zogan: I can only give my opinion in that it is a variation of a zogan technique. I have seen what I thought to be the same technique on some Umetada works. Is it exactly the same?--> That is really a question for Ford. How old are the papers? NBTHK Green or White papers? I understand why a tsuba like this might be called 'Umetada' at one point and time, and 'Kaga kinko' at another. Different judges at different times. Quote
Fuuten Posted October 28, 2016 Author Report Posted October 28, 2016 The paper i have is from 1976, Tokubetsu Kicho. Am i correct to understand that the goto reference from the auction is incorrect then? Thank you Curran. Best regards, Quote
Curran Posted October 29, 2016 Report Posted October 29, 2016 Papers say Kaga Zogan. I'm not particularly accepting of the NBTHK hozon opinions that are dated 2014 onwards, but I would stick with what the papers say over what this particular seller is saying in selling this daisho tsuba set. 1 Quote
John A Stuart Posted October 29, 2016 Report Posted October 29, 2016 It seems strange to me to slot in a tsuba by just one wee element and ignore the whole package. John Quote
Curran Posted October 29, 2016 Report Posted October 29, 2016 It seems strange to me to slot in a tsuba by just one wee element and ignore the whole package. John Yes. I'll leave it at that. 1 Quote
Fuuten Posted October 30, 2016 Author Report Posted October 30, 2016 It seems strange to me to slot in a tsuba by just one wee element and ignore the whole package. John To be honest, i only inquired so i could perhaps learn about the tsuba i already have. Unfortunately I'm not in a position to acquire more. Quote
MauroP Posted October 31, 2016 Report Posted October 31, 2016 Regarding the generic techniques, the paper say hira-zōgan (平象嵌) and tsuyu-zōgan iroe (露象嵌色絵). Here another tsuba with NBTHK attribution as Kaga-zōgan (from http://wakeidou.com/publics/index/275/) Mauro 1 Quote
Curran Posted November 1, 2016 Report Posted November 1, 2016 The two NBTHK Hozon papers in this thread are from 2016 and 2015. I said before, "These papers are dated 2016, so this may reflect one of those changes I believe came to pass in 2014". I would have attributed the one in Mauro's link as Kaga Kinko, and would have been confident NBTHK would concur prior to 2014. Mauro- thank you for the link. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.