kissakai Posted May 20, 2016 Report Posted May 20, 2016 Hi I wonder if anyone wishes to add any comments about these two tsuba? None of these will win a beauty competition so I'm not expecting any kind words just an honest opinion School: Ko Shoami Period: 1700 Size: 77 x 75 x 3.5mm The only shapes I see are leaf-like It has condition issues School: Myochin Period: 1750 Size: 59 x 50 x 4.3 and 7.1mm Fake kanji? I'm guessing the shapes may be clouds that may be a later addition Grev UK Quote
johnnyi Posted May 20, 2016 Report Posted May 20, 2016 Grev, you took really great pictures. What lighting did you use? John Quote
kissakai Posted May 20, 2016 Author Report Posted May 20, 2016 Hi John I've taken 100's of tsuba pictures so it may just be a knack Always outside ideally on an overcast day If it is sunny then using a piece of card you can move it around so direct sun light doesn't make the tsuba surface to bright Never use a flash I've used the same coloured card for ages as it doesn't influence the colours so the tsuba is more natural Any colour is OK but it needs to be a muted uniform colour that is not too bright Initially try one tsuba against different colours and see which gives the most natural tsuba tone I used a canon compact for years to good effect but now use a DSLR but sometimes my old camera gives me a better image Good luck Grev 2 Quote
rkg Posted May 20, 2016 Report Posted May 20, 2016 Grev, I'm not sure what to say about the first one - I guess it could be binned as ko-shoami. On the second one, the piece -might- be by the guys associated with tempo work. I have a tempo piece with similar inlay work: And the obligatory VR image set (as usual, click and drag to rotate): http://www.rkgphotos.com/recent_stuff/tests/vr_images/rock_snow_tempo_front/rock_snow_tempo_front.html I thought it was tempo from the auction images, In hand it was confusing - the piece looked like it might have been myochin (the iron reminded me more of what that group might use) - but after comparing the piece to several known high grade tempos, I realized it really should be classified as Tempo... Best, rkg (Richard George) Quote
kissakai Posted May 22, 2016 Author Report Posted May 22, 2016 Hi Thanks Richard for the images as they helped Can I just keep this finally to one question by just asking if the kanji on the second tsuba real? Grev UK Quote
Shugyosha Posted May 22, 2016 Report Posted May 22, 2016 Hi Grev, I think it could pass for "haru" as in springtime. Sorry, I'm on my phone at the moment so I can't copy across the kanji. I'm away from my books so I've no idea if there was a tsubako signing with this single character, but it does seem unusual. Best regards, John Quote
Pete Klein Posted May 22, 2016 Report Posted May 22, 2016 春: Haru I get the feeling that it was added after the tagane as the lower right should have been obliterated by the tagane. It's not a mei as there is no sign of anything below this character. The inlays look like they have been cleaned. It is possible they were added to an older tsuba. I hope this helps in some way. Quote
kissakai Posted May 22, 2016 Author Report Posted May 22, 2016 Hi I think that says it all and as a guide for me: Tsuba one ko shoami (catch all) with either fire damage or general corrosion Tsuba two - may originally have been myochin but kanji and 'clouds' added later so it resembles tembo work Thanks Grev Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.