CParrish Posted July 15, 2007 Report Posted July 15, 2007 I am having trouble with this translation....I think it ends in "Terukane" but I am having real difficulty with it.....Charlie Quote
Stephen Posted July 15, 2007 Report Posted July 15, 2007 Sakaura Gonnoshin Terukane Settsu J 1684 90 Sharp Toran omidre Itame masame nashiji suguba S863 Quote
CParrish Posted July 15, 2007 Author Report Posted July 15, 2007 Stephen, thanks very much for the help...is there anything else you can tell me about the smith or his work?..........Charlie Quote
Nobody Posted July 15, 2007 Report Posted July 15, 2007 Sakaura Gonnoshin Terukane Stephen is basically correct. But the first part must be Sakakura (坂倉). Quote
Stephen Posted July 15, 2007 Report Posted July 15, 2007 Koichi i dropped a K, sorry Charlie i just took it out of Hawley's Quote
CParrish Posted July 15, 2007 Author Report Posted July 15, 2007 Thanks for the help, guys....I have been away from swords for over 20 years...the only book I have left is John Yumato's....the sword I posted just fell out of the sky and kind of rekindled my interest...again , any more informationabout the swordsmit would be appreciated............Charlie Quote
Nobody Posted July 16, 2007 Report Posted July 16, 2007 Terukane (照包) and Kanesada 2nd (包貞 2nd gen.) were the same smith in Settsu. He was a student of Kanesada 1st. He changed his smith name from Kanesada to Terukane in 1680, when he gave his name Kanesada to the real son of Kanesada 1st. Therukane is a big name of Osaka-Shinto smiths. Quote
ahagen Posted May 24, 2009 Report Posted May 24, 2009 Nobody, would you offer any advise on authenticating this sword? ahagen Quote
Nobody Posted May 24, 2009 Report Posted May 24, 2009 As I am a beginner, I cannot judge the authenticity of swords except clear fakes. Quote
nagamaki - Franco Posted May 24, 2009 Report Posted May 24, 2009 hello, one example from Fujishiro. Quote
Gunome Posted May 24, 2009 Report Posted May 24, 2009 Hi, I noticed something strange on the yasuri me upper the mekugi ana. It change from sujikai to kiri ?!? The example from Fujishiro has a nakago jiri different from the photo Quote
reinhard Posted May 24, 2009 Report Posted May 24, 2009 If the blade was shortened, different yasurime on nakago's upper area and a nakago-jiri differing from the norm could be accepted, but the mei looks really bad. TERUKANE's mei are very stylish and confident. They vary only slightly and never to the extent as seen here. This blade's chances of being shoshin are minimal. reinhard Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.