Jump to content

Conway S

Gold Tier
  • Posts

    487
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Conway S

  1. John, Here are two helpful sites for identifying seal script: List of Shuowen Jiezi radicals Japanese Seals The second site will generate the seal script if you input a character. Conway
  2. Here's another "1" on the mune of a Taguchi Masatsugu along with the double "ho" stamps. Date is April (uzuki) 1943. No star stamp.
  3. Gifu stamp appears on swords from 1930s, but 1931 is too early. Conway
  4. The title was a reference to this Yahoo JP seller who previously listed a sword they claimed belonged to Hideki Tojo. It was not intended as a racial slur. Understandable that poor phrasing could cause confusion. But then again, who would come to this forum to disrespect Japanese? Conway
  5. David, Maybe it's obvious to you, but the scabbard is for a Type 3, whereas the rest of the mounts are Type 98.
  6. Maurice, I was thinking Watanabe Masanobu - 渡辺正延. Take a look on the forum and you will see signatures for this smith vary greatly. Maybe I am way off though.... Conway
  7. The bottom mark is an anchor within sakura. More examples posted on page 47 of this thread. Conway
  8. David, Here is the link to Sesko’s Swordsmiths of Japan. E Swordsmiths of Japan Conway
  9. Edward, Nice find. You correct in assuming this one has been depot refurbished during its service. The "0" is a clear indication. As you may have already read, the date is usually stamped on the guard where the current markings are found. In addition to the 小, the other markings are seal script inspection marks, which may correlate to an individual inspector. The undated guards are typically earlier production. The scabbard throat piece on this example is also less common. Here is a great link with lots of solid info on Type 32s and other military swords: http://ohmura-study.net/962.html Conway
  10. Does anyone know what the "1" signifies? Is it an inspector's mark?
  11. Steve, This sword was discussed on the forum in December. I wouldn't trust that it's a "gendaito" just because the seller states that. Many of these RJT smiths also made non-traditionally made swords as well.
  12. Looks like the nakago has not been shortened based on the photos. Other Kanenao examples like this in souvenir koshirae on Pg. 95 and Pg. 96 of "Japanese NAVAL SWORDS WW2 Swordsmiths & Workshops" by Mal Cox. Conway
  13. The green tsuka ito appears from time to time. I’ve seen quite a few on Iijima swords. I guess a question it raises for me is whether the tsuka for Type 95s were made in-house by the subcontractors or provided from an external supplier. Conway
  14. David, It looks to be signed Takai 高井Sadatsugu 貞継. Conway
  15. Fredrik, The smith is 兼則 Kanenori. There is an article in the NMB downloads section with more information on him. The date is May 1943. Conway
  16. Sam, Personally, I’d say $300 -$500 depending on the condition and whether it’s a field grade or company grade sword. There’s so many plain company grade swords of poor workmanship out there so it’s nice to have a more unique example. But that’s just my opinion as someone who’s a bit addicted to parade swords. Someone else who just wants one to complete their collection might not pay that much, but they also might not recognize the interesting historical context. Conway
  17. Thomas, The scabbard is matching. It does not have an arsenal stamp on the guard, which corroborates the warrelics EU article stating that the arsenal marks appear in the higher serial number ranges. The hole for the finger loop is present, but the leather and fastener are missing. It does have the typical sharpened cutting edge. Conway
  18. Hello Sam, I have one by E &F Horster with the two fullers. It also has a "double" Suya logo on the guard. I am always looking for examples of parade swords with the marked German blades. You should try to go back for it Conway
  19. John, I saw this one when it was listed for sale. It's a very nice example and deserves a real knot IMHO. The brown leather knots with the slider are correct for this variant. See the link below - "Middle Type" http://ohmura-study.net/957.html Conway
  20. John, Here is the one I currently have. I don't keep any records of serial numbers, but I would say what makes them difficult to research online is that many people don't know these are a distinct model so some examples get labeled online as just NCO, cavalry, or Type 32s. I also think you should ask Brian to repost this thread in the military section for better visibility. Conway
  21. Looks like the Yamamoto Gunto shop. See page 46 of the attached document. This stamp is also found in a few posts in you search it. Conway
  22. For the fuchi, Kokura oversight of Iijima is still correct for this serial number range. The streaky paint on the scabbard may be an indication it was touched up or repainted. Conway
  23. @Bruce Pennington Ki Masatsugu is mentioned in "Showa Period Swordsmiths of Fukuoka Prefecture, Kyushu and the Kokura Arsenal" by Mal Cox too. A few references to the smith.
  24. Another example on eBay right now: - Signed Ki Masatsugu https://www.ebay.com/itm/306045414160
×
×
  • Create New...