general_piffle

I'm based in the UK and have gone about buying 2 swords that were located in Japan, my written Japanese is virtually non-existent and my spoken Japanese is very basic. One, a wakizashi where the dealer spoke little to no English I got Pablo Kuntz to help me, he instructed his contact in Japan and for a small fee the sale, paperwork, etc. were finalised. The transaction went very smoothly. The other was via a Japanese dealer who understood English pretty well. So, I undertook the importation myself and it was pretty straightforward. I was fortunate not to fall foul of customs when the package arrived in the UK. One UK dealer I can recommend who I've had good dealings with is Ian Chapman (also a member of the To-ken Society), he once found me my first ever piece, which I still have - a koto katana. I have no business interests with anyone named above, this is simply my experience. Hope it helps.

Yes, you're right about the powder. Here's a comparison of just 2 characters, 2 pics (actual and rubbing) from a papered Kaboku and a pic from the example above. They're quite different, not just in form but what I would describe as 'surety' or 'positivity of stroke' when engraving. The example above seems almost timid/apologetic and the papered versions of the same characters have a definite confidence about them.

Almost a year old, but 1 year in nihonto is a single breath. This mei looks very suspect to me. The piece itself has little to none of the classic Kaboku hallmarks, that I can see. Personal opinion - but if it's genuine I'd be amazed.

At my request, Markus Sesko put a PDF together for me of Kaboku's students. Markus has always been brilliant in sharing and collating this sort of information. I've attached the PDF here to benefit others also fascinated by this sword-smith and his apprentices. KabokuStudents.pdf

Also fascinated by Kaboku, I started studying his apprentices and ended up with a beautiful wakazashi and a very powerful katana both by Musashi Taro Yasukuni. Both lovely pieces with more than a small influence from Kaboku. I look at them as a blend of skills, materials, and influences between the two sword-smiths.

Thanks Robert, I got Markus Sesko to do a translation for me as it wasn't expensive and it's good to put back into the community in some small way.

Hi Christopher, in my humble opinion if you want to spend your money on restoring this sword (regardless of its value, sentimental or otherwise) because in its restored state it will bring you even more pleasure than it does now then I would say that's money well spent. Go with your heart and as you've already identified you will need a trained expert to polish. Personally I would stick with Japan for polishing as it's the birthplace of the sword. I can recommend Mr Kenji Mishina in Tokyo. If you would like further details please feel free to message me. I have no dealings with him other than having been a customer of his and have found him to provide an excellent service, although he does have quite a long waiting list. But then a sword which has already been here for several hundred years can probably wait a little longer for the right polish.

I have two katanas and a wakizashi. The katanas are this humble but purposeful Taira Takada and a much more flamboyant beefy Musashi Taro Yasukuni from 1716 (think Sword of Doom...) plus the wakizashi is also an earlier Yasukuni from when he was under the instruction of Omura Kaboku - both of these have papered very well. I decided to polish it before shinsa and have used it to create a daisho. A couple of pictures attached. I will continue to study it and have no real desire to move it on and take in more than I already have - this contrasting mix is enough for me.

Thanks Jussi, very interesting!

I have three papers that came with my Yasukuni katana. It would be great to get translations of them if any of you with the knowledge have time. Thanks in advance.

Yes, just found this on nihonto.com: There are different schools of thought on the quality of Bungo (豊後) swords made in the Shinto period. An immediate response from many “sword experts” when Bungo(豊後) swords are mentioned is that they are not swords of great quality. Others feel that they are good swords. Perhaps a foundation of this opinion difference is that if you look at the structure of Bungo Takada (豊後高田) swords, you will see that they were made to satisfy practical rather than artistic needs. Indeed, at times of war they were sought out because of their cutting ability and sturdiness. Bearing in mind mine is koto and not shinto I'm happy with that. A sword made for cutting rather than admiring.

Interesting thanks. I've also heard that the koto blades from this school were of superior quality than the shinto blades but I guess this depends on the smith. Also without a mei we'll never know for sure the school but this is at least a good approximation. Believe they were known for their excellent cutting ability from something I've read and I can see from faint 'blocking' marks in the mune mine has certainly been used in battle during it's 500 or so years on earth.

I recently had my first ever katana polished and sent for shinsa at the NBTHK in Tokyo. It's a humble but well made mumei katana 64cm. Now accredited to the Taira-Takada school of the Bungo province, a koto katana created during the Muromachi period. Any insights or knowledge on this school or period in history gratefully received. Thanks in advance.

Thank you all for your insights. Much appreciated.