Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, lonely panet said:

Imho modern

I agree with Hamish. But only my opinion as well.

 

Reasons .....

 

The brightness of the red....looks like it's never seen the sun but also, I would expect some age variation or colour loss.

 

Similarly, to me the kanji looks like it was done yesterday. Again, very solid colour and it looks like it was all done by ne or two people.  Now I can't read it but I hope it wasn't supposed to be signed or noted by many people, because it dosnt look like it.  You might be able to shed some light on that aspect Piers @Bugyotsuji

 

I would also expect white material to have some form of age such as yellowing or discoloration in patches or folds

 

Can't say I've seen a tiger on one of these before (but I'm no expert) .....maybe it's relevant to the wording (symbolic/mascot?) or maybe it's just a nice 'tourist hook'

 

All based on gut feeling.

 

Sounds like you might have some thoughts on this Piers ?

  • Thanks 1
Posted

No, I can see all of what you are saying, Rob, the brightness of the red, the unusual tiger, lack of foxing in the white etc., but the writing looks legit. Unless someone is copying from an original somewhere…(?)

I was just curious as I have had several of these flags in the past, in varying materials and states, and I was wondering how everyone judges these, whether the fakes had any recognizable features in common? Good condition ones do sometimes come out of people’s boxes or drawers.

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...