paulj Posted December 25, 2006 Report Posted December 25, 2006 Here's a 2 kanji tachi mei signature of a sword I acquired about 25 years ago. It is in very nice quality army fittings, 68.25 cm blade, with an original field officer's tassle. I can read the second, Mitsu, but the first has me stumped. I also have a general's sword with very high quality standard army fittings with its original general's tassle. The 66.8 cm blade is signed Fujiwara Sukeyuki with a tachi mei. A third army mounted Ansei era sword in my collection has a tachi mei. It is slightly shorter than the others but according to research the smith always signed with tachi mei. Is there a significance to a tachi mei vs a katana mei? Quote
Brian Posted December 25, 2006 Report Posted December 25, 2006 I just re-uploaded this the other way round..but to me, I can't make out a thing. :? Maybe it is upside down now..or not Brian Quote
paulj Posted December 25, 2006 Author Report Posted December 25, 2006 the original post was correct. Here it is again. Quote
Stephen Posted December 25, 2006 Report Posted December 25, 2006 i was onto the Masa but that mitsu...wheww very stylized. Good going Quote
paulj Posted December 26, 2006 Author Report Posted December 26, 2006 Thanks, the Mitsu was clear but Masa didn't occur to me. Any info on him? Quote
Bungo Posted December 26, 2006 Report Posted December 26, 2006 what's with all this da vinci mirror image writing ? milt The ronin Quote
Brian Posted December 26, 2006 Report Posted December 26, 2006 Paul..sorry for playing with your post like this..but it really is an odd mei, and it looks like some of the cuts are off the edge..actually extending the metal past the edge with the burrs? Btw..from my understanding, tachi mei was originally used as guessed only on tachi...but later some smiths chose to sign that way on wakizashi and katana...and there doesn't seem to be any other purpose to it besides personal preference by the smith. Anyone have any other info on this? Brian Quote
paulj Posted December 26, 2006 Author Report Posted December 26, 2006 The signature looks closer to the edge than it really is. I'll take some other photos to show more of the tang, etc. I don't have a great camera and used natural light and flash and that created a shadow. The photo was posted correctly the first time. It's not a mirror image. The Mitsu part was always apparent to me but not the first kanji. Quote
Stephen Posted December 26, 2006 Report Posted December 26, 2006 this looks the right way to me....i have heard some smiths did sign backwards...this may be the one of a few that did. Quote
Brian Posted December 26, 2006 Report Posted December 26, 2006 Paul...apologies for screwing around with the pics then...you are right..the light and angle was making it look odd, and it is an unusual one. Would like to see a bigger pic. I will delete the altered pics from the thread. Regards, Brian Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.