Jump to content

I Ask For Help In The Identification Of The Sword.


Recommended Posts

Posted
Greetings!

I ask to express my opinion on the attribution of this sword. There are slight distortions of the sword's geometry in full-size photographs.

 

Blade length : 67 cm.. 

Sori :1.5 сm..

Mekugi : 1.

Width at the hamachi : 3.2cm..

Width at the Kissaki : 2.2cm.. 

Kasane : 0.7 cm..


 

I will be grateful for any comments and opinions.


Regards,


Alexsandr


 


 


post-4112-0-74830600-1503679907_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-73546200-1503679919_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-55803600-1503679930_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-71475700-1503679952_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-15055700-1503679966_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-97416700-1503679979_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-00356900-1503680003_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-47079700-1503680021_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-15919900-1503680044_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-19909800-1503680066_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-95702900-1503680082_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-60171400-1503680101_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-62614900-1503680120_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-36491700-1503680131_thumb.jpg

post-4112-0-38602400-1503680143_thumb.jpg

Posted
Thank you for attribution and decoding of me. I understand that Kanehira is just the name of the master. Perhaps there were some features of signing swords of that period, allowing them to sign their work with a short signature?

With respect,

Alexsandr

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Hello,

 

Between the mei and shape of the nakago-jiri/plus file marks and the gunome midare hamon, using books you may be able to narrow down period/tradition/school/and perhaps even the smith especially if the maker is rated. 

 

Polish, generally speaking on a later signed sword unless the maker is rated and can be verified, polish doesn't make much sense.

 

 

probably showa seki gendai, 

 

Hmm.

  • Like 1
Posted

Is the whole blade 67 cm or is that the length of the cutting edge?  To me, the tang looks older than WWII era and it also seems to be a bit machiokuri (shortened).  

Posted

It looks to be shin-shinto to me and could possibly have been made by the kanehira 兼平 working 1848-1860. From what I've read in Markus's nihon-Shinshinto-shi, 兼平 was an early signature of Kanetora 兼虎, son & pupil of Masao (Kiyomaros brother). This blade seems to match the described workmanship of Kanetora. Unfortunately I don't have an example to compare to.

post-1842-0-58014100-1513835876_thumb.png

post-1842-0-09677300-1513835987_thumb.png

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...