nektoalex Posted August 25, 2017 Report Posted August 25, 2017 Greetings! I ask to express my opinion on the attribution of this sword. There are slight distortions of the sword's geometry in full-size photographs. Blade length : 67 cm.. Sori :1.5 сm.. Mekugi : 1. Width at the hamachi : 3.2cm.. Width at the Kissaki : 2.2cm.. Kasane : 0.7 cm.. I will be grateful for any comments and opinions. Regards, Alexsandr Quote
lonely panet Posted August 25, 2017 Report Posted August 25, 2017 probably showa seki gendai, the mei is rough but I'm sure theres some ko nie int he first pic. worth a window to see Quote
nektoalex Posted August 28, 2017 Author Report Posted August 28, 2017 Thank you for attribution and decoding of me. I understand that Kanehira is just the name of the master. Perhaps there were some features of signing swords of that period, allowing them to sign their work with a short signature? With respect, Alexsandr Quote
nektoalex Posted December 20, 2017 Author Report Posted December 20, 2017 Please, advise, whether there is a sense to polish a sword, considering its condition and attribution? Quote
nagamaki - Franco Posted December 20, 2017 Report Posted December 20, 2017 Hello, Between the mei and shape of the nakago-jiri/plus file marks and the gunome midare hamon, using books you may be able to narrow down period/tradition/school/and perhaps even the smith especially if the maker is rated. Polish, generally speaking on a later signed sword unless the maker is rated and can be verified, polish doesn't make much sense. probably showa seki gendai, Hmm. 1 Quote
Surfson Posted December 21, 2017 Report Posted December 21, 2017 Is the whole blade 67 cm or is that the length of the cutting edge? To me, the tang looks older than WWII era and it also seems to be a bit machiokuri (shortened). Quote
J Reid Posted December 21, 2017 Report Posted December 21, 2017 It looks to be shin-shinto to me and could possibly have been made by the kanehira 兼平 working 1848-1860. From what I've read in Markus's nihon-Shinshinto-shi, 兼平 was an early signature of Kanetora 兼虎, son & pupil of Masao (Kiyomaros brother). This blade seems to match the described workmanship of Kanetora. Unfortunately I don't have an example to compare to. 1 Quote
nektoalex Posted December 21, 2017 Author Report Posted December 21, 2017 Robert S. - I will specify the dimensions: lengththe blade (nagasa) -67.0 cm; the total length of the sword is -86.0 cm. Quote
nektoalex Posted December 21, 2017 Author Report Posted December 21, 2017 Thank you all for your advice! Josh Reid - thanks for indicating directions of search-it's interesting! 1 Quote
Surfson Posted December 21, 2017 Report Posted December 21, 2017 It has much more a shinshinto feel than gendai to me, and I like Josh's hypothesis. 2 Quote
nektoalex Posted December 21, 2017 Author Report Posted December 21, 2017 It has much more a shinshinto feel than gendai to me, and I like Josh's hypothesis. I'm with you! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.