noneed2hate

I am looking to sell this Hawley Japanese Swordsmith book set (Volume 1 and Volume 2). Asking $150 shipped OBO Conus. Please let me know if you have any questions or require more photos, thank you!

I will in fact *NOT* be using Brasso or Brillo pads. I'll leave it to Woody to give it the correction/care it deserves

You can usually tell a sword has been shortened without removing the tsuka and inspecting the nakago, the geometries/measurements/overall sugata will be strange compared to what is expected for a given school or line of smiths IMO

TokyoSword https://tokyosword.myshopify.com/collections/sword I don't think I would have issue purchasing from them again (assuming it's something too good to pass up) in the future as I've had many good transactions, but as far as coordinating services for things, that ship has sailed.

Was certainly using the term very loosely here but added some quotation marks for posterity. In any case, it's bridge under the water at this point and that particular matter has been resolved as much as can reasonably be expected. Indeed, I was too naïve in this regard, I should have been more thorough in vetting who it was that was recommended etc.

Not sure but that is what it weighs bare Yes they were, unfortunately it seems "the polisher" in question decided to just touch up the blade rather than do what was asked. It seems even still they decided to stop halfway through that process as evident by the boshi which they burnished and rounded off the geometries of.

Hello All, Wanted to share my recent acquisition - an NBTHK-Hozon Katana attributed to the Sue-Hosho school. Overall dimensions are as follows: Nagasa : 68 cm Sori : 24 mm Total length : 97 cm Motohaba : 29.9 mm Sakihaba : 20 mm Motokasane : 6.4 mm Sakikasane : 4.3 mm Blade Weight : 544 grams I had the dealer I purchased the sword from coordinate to have it sent to a "polisher" they recommended while it was in Japan. Unfortunately this led to a less than sub-par and quite frustrating result that was not apparent until I received it in hand. I will be sending this off for a new shirasaya soon and then to Woody Hall for correction of the polish. Beyond the polish or lack thereof rather, I am absolutely in love with the sugata and dimensions of this sword and am looking forward to getting it back in good shape. I will likely submit for Tokubetsu Hozon in the future once the polish/shirasaya is complete.

Indeed, the mei does give me some apprehension for submitting to shinsa. If I feel the urge to submit it, I might have the mei removed professionally prior to doing so, otherwise I'll just appreciate the sword as is for now and study some more.

Thank you very much! It was the only Tsuba I saw that I immediately felt the urge to buy. I quite like it.

Will attempt this advice for some more photos a bit later, thank you No problem at all! I think so as well Can't stop staring at it Sadly not, perhaps I might submit it for shinsa in the future depending.

Here's a few more photos as requested:

Picked this Mokume Tsuba up at an antique shop in Japan. I thought it was a particularly interesting Tsuba overall give the oddly shaped ana and samegawa inserts as well as the copper braiding on the sides. I believe the signature reads 明珍「_」宗晴　Myochin [?]Muneharu? Could not figure out the top left Kanji however if anyone could assist with that one. Any thoughts on the Tsuba overall? This is more or less my first serious approach to Tsuba

Finally got the sword back from polishing by Woody and has a fresh shirasaya made by Mike Virgadamo. Absolutely stunning nie and well worth the wait.

It's Uda Kunimune, what is giving you doubts about it? All the papers also say Uda Kunimune, especially the NBTHK one.

I've just received 3 items from this seller, no qualms with the description or what I received and she was willing to negotiate a large sum off the initial listing prices. She posts a lot of items up for sale regularly, so it would stand to reason mistakes may occur here and there. All that said, I'm sorry you gentlemen had a poor experience

Was this not in the same condition when it originally sold for $400? If so, that's a shame

I had a great time at this show and very much look forward to the next one! A lot of really nice swords to look at and appreciate (even if I couldn't purchase anything this time around), the antique guns portion of the show was also nice, as it allowed me to take a break from Nihonto (WHO WANTS TO DO THAT?!) and just galivant while looking at some other equally neat pieces of history. In terms of size, scope and quality, I'd say it was on par with the SF show. The lectures and demonstrations were fantastic, and they provided a lot of context for me as a new person to the world of Nihonto. Here's a small summary of each to the best of my memory. Brian Tschernaga showed each of the major stages to making habaki. Demonstrated drawing out material with a hammer and then the annealing process once the material (copper in this case IIRC) had gotten too hard from the hammering. He also demonstrated how to shape and then solder/weld the habaki once it was at the appropriate dimensions. He then demonstrated the process to create the "cat scratch" marks on the sides of a habaki, as well as adjusting and explaining final fit and finish with emphasis on where the habaki should be "grabbing" the nakago, and where it shouldn't. Overall, I think this gave me a new found respect of how much work goes into even something seemingly simple like a habaki. Woody Hall's demonstration was excellent as well, he show essentially each of the major steps for both the foundation polish as well as finish polish. He worked through the various stones he had on hand for each major polishing phase explaining what he was doing and why he was doing so each step of the way. Overall, he showed us A LOT in the given short amount of time he had, and was even able to produce an example of a finished polish in real time (as much as possible given time constraints.) Both presenters had a plethora of tools and material laid out for reference both prior to and at the conclusion of their respective demonstrations. Mike Yamasaki's discussion regarding kantei and purchasing of swords was also very good and absolutely touched on a lot of key things I often personally overlook in my own hubris. Discussion about doing research PRIOR to buying a sword as he is often asked on whether someone had gotten a "good deal" etc on swords they didn't research but ended up purchasing. Paying attention to the characteristics of a sword, rather than the mei chiseled into the nakago etc. Treating non-papered swords with mei as mumei in that the mei might not be legitimate but the sword itself is still something worthwhile assuming the price is right. Thanks again to Mark for putting this together!

Someone really wanted it badly, went for $3638 I hope whoever got it was paying attention and realized the nakago had since been cleaned among the other lackluster aspects.

Planning to go as well, really looking forward to it!

Never really had one, but to the best of my knowledge, this registration card follows the sword rather than the person, and is subject to police verification/confirmation whenever asked.

The "certificate" is just a sword registration paper AKA Torokusho that more or less has to follow the sword while it remains in Japan. These papers are turned in to the Japanese Government on exportation of the swords. They do not validate or certify anything beyond this being a sword AFAIK. Hard to see much detail on the sword, a lot of glare/glow in the photos

Perhaps an effort to keep the saya more balanced assuming it was used with a shorter sword?

This was the best I was able to come up with but still wasn't able to piece together something that sounded grammatically correct - 伊藤昌盛因好 - 伊(kore/i?) 藤 (to/fuji?)昌(sho?)盛(mori?)因(in?)好(yoshi/suki?) I asked a gentleman in Japan who is also involved in the Nihonto community and part of a group I'm in, and he advised me that portion doesn't not make any sense.

It's back up on ebay - https://www.ebay.com/itm/134375920654 Seems the seller in their grand "wisdom" cleaned the Nakago.... In any case, the sword seems spurious to me in terms of being even a legitimate Nihonto, something about the way the sword appears in the photos leads me to believe it is of Chinese production but I could be wrong. Seems many folks are willing to shell out for this sword sadly, it's already at $1300 with 8 days left to go.

He answered my inquiry with the following Nakago pictures just a few hours ago: Ura: 大慶直胤 - Taikei Naotane allegedly Omote: Made in the 10th Year of Tempo - 天保 Wasn't really able to work out the rest grammatically in a way that made sense to me- 伊藤昌盛因好作之 Kind of frustrating they can't seem to take good pictures of the sword itself. Good to know it went as high as $1500 at auction before they cancelled, because now I know they think it's worth much more and that I'm priced out haha