Bruce Pennington

Adam, the guys at Translation Assistance could hammer this out real fast for you: http://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/forum/15-translation-assistance/

Thanks Thomas, that's actually quite a good example of that Private-purchase stamp! To me, it's not the same as the Matsu stamp: 私

I'm glad they cleared your reputation Chris. So many auction houses sell obvious fakes and ignore our input when we try to let them know, yet here is a guy selling a legit sword and gets harrassed by a nincompoop. Very frustrating.

Yes, the smith obviously put some time and effort into it. I'm just really happy it was available right when I was looking for one! BTW - the seller was Sohei Swords. Anyone know who he is? Is he an NMB member?

Thanks George, I'll file the pics for use on the Koshirae markings. I remember reading that discussion and had assumed the "O" was the number "zero" at the time. But if you have other examples with "Ta" and "i" at the beginning, I can see that the "o" was likely a letter as you say. In your original post you said ""ta" may have identified Niigata Pref. and "o" may have meant Aomori Pref. (I have a number "o"154 on a tang by Aomori RJT Nagao Kunishiro dated 19/2). We just don't know yet." Do you have a theory as to what the "i" represents? Finally, I'm assuming both the Ta and the i were actually in katakana? But the "O" was in Romanji (english). Not unheard of, of course, and many gunto show a mixture of katakana and romanji.

George, I've fixed the Aomori typos. On the koshirae stamps, I'll add your discussion, but it would aid the discussion if I had a good picture for an example. Do you have one you can attach? If not, how about a link to the NMB disucussion, maybe there are pictures from the other guy you mentioned. As to Nick's published order about stamping rented/private purchase - there have been a couple of other "orders" that Nick has found that have no actual examples proving that they were put into effect. This is a third one. He had one declaring that Type 95 serial numbers, when they reached the 100,000 range use a Kanji for thousand (or hundred thousand; I'm going by memory) so "1[kanji]234". We have hundreds of gunto now and NONE of them used that nomenclature. It may be that the stamping was never used, at least we have no known examples that it was. But speaking of that stamp, I compared a Matsu kanji with his stamp, and to me, they don't look the same. Take a look. Are they different kanji, or is the difference simply stylistic?

Ok guys, here’s an Ichi stamped 95 in the 100,000 range! 106773 to be exact. fleabay: https://www.ebay.ca/itm/WW2-Japanese-NCO-OFFICERS-SWORD-MATCHING-NUMBERS-ON-BLADE-SCABBARD-MINTY-C13/402003773216?hash=item5d994ac720:g:qpIAAOSwOzld-5Qv

Chuck, I've found that when my pics are posting sideways, a simple edit/crop, no matter how small on the edges, will fix the problem and they will post upright.

Looks like over 1,400 of them!

What do you think those 3 in the back are? They seem to have metal backstraps, but they're way too short for kyu gunto. Navy patrol or police?

Stamps Document 5.0 attached. I had hoped to rewrite the introductory discussions on the Showa, Star, and Seki stamps, but really cannot do a better job than the guys already quoted. So, I elliminated some duplicative discussions and added personal notes about some dates. Reduced the overall size by 2 pages. Small additions to hotstamps and Type 95 steel fuchi stamps, and some small adjustments to the Mantetsu discussion. Many thanks to all who continue to assist in making the discoveries about this part of gunto history! Stamp 5.0.pdf

Wow, Alex! That's quite a collection of books! You should add it to the "What else do you collect" NMB thread: http://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/29919-what-else-do-you-collect/?hl=%2Bwhat+%2Belse+%2Bcollect

Thanks Pete, I will look at this one too.

Ha! Isn't that from a Harry Potter movie? If not, Hollywood needs to see it for future films!

Thanks Ed, I hadn't heard that before.

Thanks guys. After seeing it again, I'm surprised I even had to ask! DOH! Maybe the 94 fittings had me all "love is blind"!

Thanks Chris. The auction pics aren't good enough to tell if the fittings are real, but seem to be. Too bad, I don't have a good Type 94 yet.

This one is in Type 94 fittings, which would be nice to have, but it's got a serial number stamped on the habaki (standard Chinese mistake), and I don't like the kanji on the nakago. This this legit or a bad fake? Auction here; https://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/80111194_japanese-sword Thanks for the help!

Here is the link to the Sale and Trade forum here at NMB. It works! I recently sold a gunto through that forum. The advantage is that you'll save yourself the bay-fees, and you'll know the gunto is going to a true collector who will honor the blade.

The context of the meeting minutes was in fact Type 95 production. “ 1945 April Production Report (Remarks column) "Recent bombing raids have destroyed production facilities at all suppliers (Suya, Kobe and Iida). Though progress is being made in relocating their production elsewhere, resumption of production is anticipated only from July onwards. Officer gunto production also lost all blade workshops, both within the arsenal and at private companies. Through desperate means, prospects for a supply of approximately 700 blades have been secured, but as facilities for exterior components also had been decimated, none can be assembled into complete swords. Regarding these exterior parts, we are currently calling on Association members such as Iida, Hinodeya and Sugito to work together in establishing new production facilities in Kofu City in Yamanashi Prefecture."

I don't think it's traditional. Ohmura calls them Zohei-to, which it think literally means "factory sword." But at the time, late 1800's to early 1900's, they were state of the art, and hardened edge.

正恒 (Masatsune) (real name) 天池 鈴一郎 So, seems to have been made by the Japanese for the Manchurian navy! I know so little about that side of the war. I know there were actual Japanese personnel working with the collaborative forces, and they would have had their own gunto. I wonder if this is an example of that? Or were the Japanese making gunto for certain echelons of leadership on the Chinese side? Much of what we see are the swords made BY the collaborators, and the quality is obvious.

Very cool Dean! Both look fairly old, have you had anyone give you a guess on age?

It's my first Kyu (probably my only). I love the work that went into the little details. (of course this is true for all Japanese metal-work)...

Wifey decided to get me a real Christmas present this year - a really nice Type 8/19 with a Naohiro combat blade! It's the one John showed us on another thread, but don't worry, I didn't pay that price! Just a normal market price. I love the finely done double bohi. The blade is immaculate, and I like the double ashi. Enjoy: