I have a kodzuka signed Goto Genjo with kao which I'd like to discuss.
It's in shakudo with a partial gold reverse, I think which is mercury gilded(?)
The nanako is hand done and not plate.
I'd like to find out more regarding the artist.
From this thread, viewtopic.php?f=15&t=5366, the same mei is shown and the two compare well in my opinion, so that makes me think it is not gimei, although it's possible both are.
The work on the dragon is well detailed and crisp but the nanako background is, imo, not so great.
From an article in an old journal of the 'To-Ken society of Great Britain', I believe the Goto school used Tatsuta nanako which had three types: horizontal, diagonal and vertical alignment- signifying late, mid and early Goto.
My piece appears to have horizontal alignment, although not precisely perfect, which signifies late Goto.
However, Reinhard says in the thread linked above that Genjo worked in the Keicho period(1596 - 1615) which seems a little early to be late Goto.
As the nanako is not great quality, I'm guessing that Genjo is not a master and either his own nanako technique needed work or that he was provided with a nanako ground to work on that is not great quality, presumably indicating the better nanako ground makers work went to masters, again meaning Genjo was not top ranked.
Although the kodzuka is very good quality in my opinion, I don't think it is Goto master work.
What do you guys think?