ROKUJURO

Jacques, don't look so much at the possibly lacking competence of others! I know you are very knowledgeable in this field, so your opinion might be especially valuable to us!

What makes it a TACHI blade?

Could that be SHODO equipment in the foreground? I think I can see a SUMIBACHI with an ink stick. Representing a poet or a painter at work in the beauriful landscape?

Jacques, I had the impression that Sky just asked for opinions of knowledgeable collectors.....

This is very surprizing to me. Perhaps it should be "....Late HEIAN to Late KAMAKURA period..."?

KUNIYOSHI signed TANTO? More pictures of the "naked" blade (without HABAKI) on a plain dark, non-reflecting background would help for an impression of what you have.

No, I don't think so. I see a nice patina, and even the gold accents look intact.

Looks like an excellent BUSHU TSUBA to me.

Try JAKUSHI.

When the corrosion is heavy and no HAMON can be seen, there is sometimes a fire involved.

Jack, there is always a possibility that a was in a fire and damaged. Blades should always be presented tip-upwards, especially the NAKAGO. This would make reading a signature easier.

No, I cannot see the signature. You need to post a close-up photo of the NAKAGO, tip-upwards, dark background, light from the side. But on the other hand, as the blade is Damascus steel, we don't need more photos, it is clear that it is not Japanese.

Mark, welcome on board the NMB! Your sword is signed KANETAKA, who may have been the worker or smith who made it. The photos are not good enough to guess if this is a machine made blade or a traditionally hand-made (water-quenched) one. Good focus would be necessary to see details, and a dark room, light from the side and a dark background would help a lot.

Difficult to say for me what was first - YAMAGANE or iron in this kind of TSUBA? But I don't remember the so-called SAOTOME TSUBA being made of copper. Referring to the HITSU, this TSUBA could have been made pre-EDO. I have seen these TSUBA made from small parts (= single spokes) that were fitted into the MIMI rather than cut out of a solid blank. Age of my below pictured TSUBA: No idea, I guess early to mid EDO. In any case, it must have been a lot of work! Compare this one with 64 petals (Diameter 94,5 mm)!

Piers, these are intersting and valuable ideas! But we shoukld not forget that our ancestor craftsmen were inventive and even ingenious. Grinding with stones is a neolithic technique as well as drilling, and all iron-working cultures found ways to use similar tools. Coming back to early iron TSUBA, we see that piercing/SUKASHI techniques were dominantly executed with chisels, and only the finishing was done by grinding and filing. If I remenber correctly, in his videos, Ford Hallam showed the use of small grinding stones in his work - not his invention, but learned from his master. Just remenber AKASAKA TSUBA with heavy chisel traces (not removed or ground level!) on the inner side of the MIMI! Files were used much earlier than metal saws in Japan, so we should not look at iron SUKASHI TSUBA with the notion of our present technologies. And there is another point we often forget: Working time was no issue in former eras. The goal was the finished item, and people were not paid on working hours but on the quality of the single workpiece. So "working slowly" is just a picture in our brains as we live in times where speed is dictated by machines. When a beaver is gnawing down a tree, he rarely looks at his watch - he works until the tree falls.

Jack, we are all learning! No sweat! The question is what you can learn from items like yours. After a while, I think you will want to "upgrade" a bit to be able to get more information out of your treasures. That is basically the fun in collection items like these: We want to know who made them and imagine/speculate who might have carried them.

Jack, as mentioned above, this seems to be a broken-off piece of a longer blade. The tip has been ground by an amateur, and all features - HADA, HATARAKI, SUGATA....) are lost. It even might have been in a fire, considering the surface, or have served as agricultural tool. Just looking at the NAKAGO, it might have been a WAKIZASHI of some age, but in this condition, there is little chance to determine the exact age or tradition/school, I am afraid.

...images without TSUBA, SEPPA, and HABAKI, please? On a dark background?

It is a very good idea to have the blade checked carefully first and NOT TO ATTEMPT a DIY POLISH! Low viscosity mineral oil will help a bit, but CAMELLIA oil would be best. After application, removing the excess is important so no oil gets into the SAYA.

This boar is very close to those in the "Asterix and Obelix" comics! (before dinner)

Hamish, as far as I know, there were several clans who used HANABISHI KAMON.

MITSU KE? Just an assembly mark, as mentioned before.

Alexander, welcome on board the NMB! What are you looking for? You managed to post here, so it will not be more difficult to post in the "WANT TO BUY" section.

Marcel, could you please make a photo of the NAKAGO (vertical, tip-upwards) without HABAKI, showing both MACHI?

Charles, I am not an expert on KACHU, but as far as I know they are traditionally made of thin iron with a lacquer coating. Different colouring could be a result of combining parts of different origin, but not necessarily. The gold colour may be an effect of different layers of URUSHI, in this case a metallic component (gold ot copper powder) could have been coated with transparent URUSHI.