AussieMacca1972 Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 Hi guys. I’ve been informed these are Mino Goto and Mino Bori style work. Was hoping for some definitive conclusions if possible. thanks in advance for any help. Mark Quote
ChrisW Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 Rarely is there anything ever definitive within the nihonto world. But these tsuba do look like they pass for a daisho set. Short of being signed and dated by the same smith, this is as close as one can get really. 1 Quote
MauroP Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 Nice Kyō-kanagushi daisho, but not even close to Mino Gotō quality, IMHO. 2 Quote
Matsunoki Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 The shape, size, colour (especially of the seppadai ) and overall appearance remind me of “Nagoya-mono” I doubt they are shakudo. 2 Quote
Spartancrest Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 Sorry to agree with Mauro, there are areas that true Mino Gotō would not have made this way. Some gold overflows and the ubiquitous tagane-ato found on many Nagoya-mono 1 Quote
Spartancrest Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 (edited) Colin you just beat me to it! Edited June 29 by Spartancrest 2 Quote
Exclus1ve Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 I agree with what's been said above. And I don't think the «Tokubetsu Kicho» status has anything to do with this piece. Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 To be fair the old Hosokawa Kaichō paperwork does not suggest Mino or Nagoya or Kyoto or anywhere at all. It’s simply descriptive of Mokkōgata ‘shakudo’ Daisho Takabori Tsuba showing Shishi/Botan, adding ‘Mumei’. Nagoyamono is entirely possible, agreed. 1 Quote
AussieMacca1972 Posted June 29 Author Report Posted June 29 Thanks for the info guys. Also I should have worded my post better. Meant to say “Mino Goto style”. And yes the old paperwork mentions no school at all. 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.