Kubur Posted August 26 Report Posted August 26 Hi everyone, I’d really appreciate your help in identifying two swords I’ve come across. Any insights or guidance would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks in advance! Kubur Quote
ChrisW Posted August 27 Report Posted August 27 Hard to say much other than they appear to be proper antique Japanese swords. Can you give us some measurements? (Blade edge length, etc. ) Pictures of the nakago (tang) would also be very helpful in estimating age/might tell you who made it. Quote
Rivkin Posted August 27 Report Posted August 27 First is koshi zori with a larger chu kissaki. By default Muromachi, less likely later than 1530. Correction: just looked at higher res version, hard to say actually. hope better pictures will tell! Second is shot at weird angle, no comments. Quote
Kubur Posted August 27 Author Report Posted August 27 Thanks Chris, I will do more photos. Thanks Kirill, I will take better photos of the second sword. I'm a happy owner of your two books! :-) Quote
Rivkin Posted August 27 Report Posted August 27 23 minutes ago, Kubur said: Thanks Kirill, I will take better photos of the second sword. I'm a happy owner of your two books! :-) Thanks! Photos of bare blades from the top, the bare nakago (I think there is little risk in getting out pins here), some details of the blades can help a lot. P.S. I am not as good with Japanese blades though, but it usually works out. Quote
Kubur Posted August 28 Author Report Posted August 28 Hi I posted more photos on the other forum, nihonto discussion Thanks :-) Quote
Kubur Posted August 29 Author Report Posted August 29 12 hours ago, Kubur said: Hi I posted more photos on the other forum, nihonto discussion Thanks :-) I post here too, I don't know which forum is the best. Thanks!! Quote
Kubur Posted September 16 Author Report Posted September 16 Hi, I'm sending more photos of the two swords. Thanks for your support and comments Quote
Kubur Posted September 16 Author Report Posted September 16 I like both, but I prefer the one on the Katana kake... Quote
Kubur Posted September 18 Author Report Posted September 18 Hi Guys, More photos as requested, any opinions? Quote
Scogg Posted September 18 Report Posted September 18 Thank you for sharing your blades. Unfortunately, it's difficult to provide meaningful feedback based on the current photos. Because your swords are mumei (unsigned), we must rely entirely on their sugata (overall shape), hamon, hada, and other physical details to offer reliable feedback. I’ve attached a visual guide (see below) outlining how to photograph a nihonto for the most accurate feedback, please: - Photograph the entire blade (sugata) from a straight overhead angle, with the tip pointing north and tang pointing south. - Remove all fittings, including the habaki, to expose the full blade and tang (nakago). Also close-ups of: -The kissaki/boshi (tip) - The hada/hamon (grain/temper line) - The hamachi/munemachi (notches of the edge and spine @ the nakago) - The nakago/mei (tang/signature area, even if unsigned) Against a dark background is best. From what I can see so far, your blades appear to be suriage or osuriage mumei katana with extended kissaki, very likely pre-WW2. However, clearer and more complete images are needed for meaningful feedback. Can you discern a visible hamon in the kissaki area (Boshi)? Cool swords! All the best, -Sam 1 Quote
Scogg Posted September 18 Report Posted September 18 PS... Sorry to ask for so many very specific photos. It’s just the nature of the beast in this hobby Your photos are actually quite well done, but for the more knowledgeable members to give good information: very specific angles and details are necessary. Even then, photographs of nihonto are almost always limited in what they can reveal. Often, the best way to get truly accurate information is to have the sword examined in person by an expert. Best, -Sam 1 Quote
Kubur Posted September 18 Author Report Posted September 18 Thank you very much Sam I tried to follow Jean's tips. However the light is really not great. I will focus on the area that you mentioned. One blade is clean but the other is tarnished. Which kind of products should i sued to clean it and block the rust? Thanks again Quote
Scogg Posted September 18 Report Posted September 18 First and foremost, do not do anything to the tang (nakago). It’s very important that area remains unmolested. Otherwise, just a light cleaning and oiling is what you will want to do. https://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/faq/1-care-and-maintenance/ I would skip any use of uchiko. It ends up causing more harm than good unless you’re very familiar with what you’re doing and have high quality uchiko. Best of luck, -Sam PS. When in doubt, do not hurry. The blades have survived long before we were alive, and they will survive through our lifetime and beyond. So if you are uncomfortable with anything above, don’t feel bad to wait until you can do more research. If Nihonto has taught me anything in life, it’s patience Quote
Rivkin Posted September 19 Report Posted September 19 Unfortunately both out of polish, so its next to impossible to say something. They are bother either o-kissaki or extended chu kissaki, which suggests shinshinto, Momoyama or Nambokucho. The one where we can see the hamon looks a bit like Mino or Bizen from Muromachi, so might be Momoyama of this school. The one with hi - the hi is not the best cutting job I've seen, but the blade itself might be either of these three options, or less likely something else. It does not look very beefy, so also might be koto. If one is lucky even Nanbokucho, but there is zero polish so no idea. Quote
Kubur Posted September 19 Author Report Posted September 19 1 hour ago, Rivkin said: Unfortunately both out of polish, so its next to impossible to say something. They are bother either o-kissaki or extended chu kissaki, which suggests shinshinto, Momoyama or Nambokucho. The one where we can see the hamon looks a bit like Mino or Bizen from Muromachi, so might be Momoyama of this school. The one with hi - the hi is not the best cutting job I've seen, but the blade itself might be either of these three options, or less likely something else. It does not look very beefy, so also might be koto. If one is lucky even Nanbokucho, but there is zero polish so no idea. Thanks! I thought 19th c you are suggesting earlier? About polish: just with the oil mnetionned by Sam? Have a great day or night Quote
Rivkin Posted September 19 Report Posted September 19 49 minutes ago, Kubur said: Thanks! I thought 19th c you are suggesting earlier? About polish: just with the oil mnetionned by Sam? Have a great day or night No, I was saying Muromachi additionally. It can still be 19th century, but I am more inclined to guess (there is really little), its earlier. Regarding polish - these blades need to be studied in hand, before that very light oil cover could be applied. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.