Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 11/29/2025 at 3:55 PM, John C said:

3. Arrow at left top shows that the himotoshi are the same size, which is also common on fakes (one should be bigger to accomodate the knot in the cord)

4. Arrow at the bottom is to indicate that the "signature" is only roughly Japanese, which again, is common on fakes. Real netsuke are only occasionally signed and it is done very artistically. 

 

To be fair, this isn't entirely true. Many genuine netsuke (especially later ones from the 19th century) have cord holes of the same size. Also, signatures were uncommon on earlier netsuke, but became more and more common in later times, and while some of them were indeed artistically made, others were just cursive scribbles. Check out these reference books for examples of both kinds:

 

https://archive.org/search?query=lazarnick

 

  • Like 2
Posted

This is why I have never purchased a netsuke. I have read 3 different books and still can't tell the difference between real and fake. Back to the drawing board....

 

John C.

Posted
50 minutes ago, John C said:

This is why I have never purchased a netsuke. I have read 3 different books and still can't tell the difference between real and fake. Back to the drawing board....


Well you did accurately tell that the one posted here is fake. My point is that all the “rules” you can think of have exceptions, but after you have seen (and possibly handled) hundreds of genuine pieces the fake ones will just seem obvious to you.

 

(Note that I’m talking about tourist trinkets here, sophisticated forgeries are a different matter).

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

You need to spend quality time looking through collections, at photos in books, in museums (Pietro has a huge list of links) or/and in direct handling sessions.

 

Gradually you will begin to ‘see’ with your own eyes what original Netsuke were.

 

As with Nihonto, you need to see many good blades in order to develop an eye. It is hard to make progress looking only at poor quality blades.

 

PS And some Netsuke I see are still borderline for me… i.e. very difficult to judge.

Posted (edited)

I've come across two of these things now labeled as "netsuke or sagemono ornamentation." Does anyone know how they were used? (third pic is the back side of pic 1)

Seems like a handle of some sort.

 

John C.

Screenshot 2025-12-01 at 9.26.37 PM.png

Screenshot 2025-12-01 at 9.27.12 PM.png

Screenshot 2025-12-01 at 9.38.42 PM.png

Edited by John C
added info
Posted

Sadly no, John. I have seen many of them in different shapes, usually with that straight-cut piece(?) missing. Some kind of whistle I used to think, but no-one has yet provided a satisfactory answer. Can anyone help?

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Just to add one more pic for identification, all of these (found 3 so far) have nearly identical holes including a large openning at the bottom. All listed as netsuke. But I don't think any one of the sellers has a clue what it is. I've seen similar items as pipes and powder flasks, though without the large openning. 

 

John C.

Screenshot 2025-12-02 at 1.54.35 PM.png

Posted

Ultimately almost anything could have been used as a Netsuke, including fishing net weights. I have several primitive objects which were probably used that way.

 

These are the only stag antler bits here at the moment, from my odds ‘n ends box, but one has that straight-cut section. Some may be Ainu work.

 

IMG_8428.thumb.jpeg.5366e5600739f9f4dfca8ffa4d801cea.jpeg

 

and over

IMG_8429.thumb.jpeg.80a0e3eead2a0de525a7a628442a78a9.jpeg

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, John C said:

.....But I don't think any one of the sellers has a clue what it is......

To me, they look like somewhat distorted interpretations of SEN no RIKYU's famous bamboo HANAIRE (one of them being called "ONJÔJI")

G-4217-1_C0042590.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Posted
5 hours ago, ROKUJURO said:

SEN no RIKYU's famous bamboo HANAIRE

Jean:

Were they meant to hold water? The top of the pieces certainly look like a hanaire but these don't have bottoms and wouldn't hold water.

John C.

Posted

John,

these HANAIRE were not meant to hold water. As far as I know from more recent pieces, a container was made/soldered from tin or copper to fit into it.
You can stand them upright (then they don't even need a closed bottom) or hang them on a nail.

Many years ago I got my hands on big bamboo and made one myself for IKEBANA. I always dreamt of having a TOKONOMA..... 

Piers, your HANAIRE is nice! Is that a Camellia flower in it?

  • Like 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, ROKUJURO said:

John,

these HANAIRE were not meant to hold water. As far as I know from more recent pieces, a container was made/soldered from tin or copper to fit into it.
You can stand them upright (then they don't even need a closed bottom) or hang them on a nail.

Many years ago I got my hands on big bamboo and made one myself for IKEBANA. I always dreamt of having a TOKONOMA..... 

Piers, your HANAIRE is nice! Is that a Camellia flower in it?

Correct, they usually have a small vase or container inside.

Jean, I know camellia were considered unlucky by some, but we can do azaleas too! :laughing:

Oh, and create that tokonoma!!! :thumbsup:
IMG_4956.thumb.jpeg.88bc69097e36b554219e548149e668f7.jpeg

 

  • Love 1
Posted

Just heard back from the seller on the bone hanaire. He says it is indeed the shape of a hanaire but believes it is a netsuke representation due to its size (about 8cm long).

 

John C.

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...