PietroParis Posted Monday at 12:13 PM Report Posted Monday at 12:13 PM On 11/29/2025 at 3:55 PM, John C said: 3. Arrow at left top shows that the himotoshi are the same size, which is also common on fakes (one should be bigger to accomodate the knot in the cord) 4. Arrow at the bottom is to indicate that the "signature" is only roughly Japanese, which again, is common on fakes. Real netsuke are only occasionally signed and it is done very artistically. To be fair, this isn't entirely true. Many genuine netsuke (especially later ones from the 19th century) have cord holes of the same size. Also, signatures were uncommon on earlier netsuke, but became more and more common in later times, and while some of them were indeed artistically made, others were just cursive scribbles. Check out these reference books for examples of both kinds: https://archive.org/search?query=lazarnick 2 Quote
John C Posted Monday at 07:14 PM Report Posted Monday at 07:14 PM This is why I have never purchased a netsuke. I have read 3 different books and still can't tell the difference between real and fake. Back to the drawing board.... John C. Quote
PietroParis Posted Monday at 08:12 PM Report Posted Monday at 08:12 PM 50 minutes ago, John C said: This is why I have never purchased a netsuke. I have read 3 different books and still can't tell the difference between real and fake. Back to the drawing board.... Well you did accurately tell that the one posted here is fake. My point is that all the “rules” you can think of have exceptions, but after you have seen (and possibly handled) hundreds of genuine pieces the fake ones will just seem obvious to you. (Note that I’m talking about tourist trinkets here, sophisticated forgeries are a different matter). 1 Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted Monday at 11:51 PM Author Report Posted Monday at 11:51 PM You need to spend quality time looking through collections, at photos in books, in museums (Pietro has a huge list of links) or/and in direct handling sessions. Gradually you will begin to ‘see’ with your own eyes what original Netsuke were. As with Nihonto, you need to see many good blades in order to develop an eye. It is hard to make progress looking only at poor quality blades. PS And some Netsuke I see are still borderline for me… i.e. very difficult to judge. Quote
John C Posted Tuesday at 05:39 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 05:39 AM (edited) I've come across two of these things now labeled as "netsuke or sagemono ornamentation." Does anyone know how they were used? (third pic is the back side of pic 1) Seems like a handle of some sort. John C. Edited Tuesday at 05:41 AM by John C added info Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted Tuesday at 07:53 AM Author Report Posted Tuesday at 07:53 AM Sadly no, John. I have seen many of them in different shapes, usually with that straight-cut piece(?) missing. Some kind of whistle I used to think, but no-one has yet provided a satisfactory answer. Can anyone help? 1 Quote
Matsunoki Posted Tuesday at 08:12 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 08:12 AM Never seen one in 40+ years. Shape would suggest stag antler and my guess would also be whistle. Possibly a hawking whistle? 1 Quote
John C Posted Tuesday at 02:12 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 02:12 PM I agree that it is antler. Doesn't seem like it could whistle with such a large opening. A powder horn attachment of some type? John C. Quote
Matsunoki Posted Tuesday at 03:13 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 03:13 PM Hmmm…whistles do have large openings…see below. . Wonder if the smaller holes vary the pitch/tone/note like a flute? Pure guesswork though! Quote
John C Posted Tuesday at 10:01 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 10:01 PM Just to add one more pic for identification, all of these (found 3 so far) have nearly identical holes including a large openning at the bottom. All listed as netsuke. But I don't think any one of the sellers has a clue what it is. I've seen similar items as pipes and powder flasks, though without the large openning. John C. Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted Wednesday at 12:45 AM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 12:45 AM Ultimately almost anything could have been used as a Netsuke, including fishing net weights. I have several primitive objects which were probably used that way. These are the only stag antler bits here at the moment, from my odds ‘n ends box, but one has that straight-cut section. Some may be Ainu work. and over 1 Quote
ROKUJURO Posted Wednesday at 07:33 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 07:33 PM 21 hours ago, John C said: .....But I don't think any one of the sellers has a clue what it is...... To me, they look like somewhat distorted interpretations of SEN no RIKYU's famous bamboo HANAIRE (one of them being called "ONJÔJI") 1 1 Quote
ROKUJURO Posted Wednesday at 07:39 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 07:39 PM Piers, one of the small items shown in your last photos could also be such a "HANAIRE", made from the foot of a big bamboo, now interpreted in bone. 1 Quote
John C Posted yesterday at 01:04 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:04 AM A snaphaunce tinder box on ebay. Seller says it's brass and wants 2,400 dollars! Aren't most of these made from iron? Photos are just dark and blurry enough to obscure details. https://www.ebay.com/itm/127535806287 John C. 1 Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted yesterday at 01:04 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 01:04 AM Why didn’t I think of that!? Here’s one I made! 1 2 Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted yesterday at 01:05 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 01:05 AM John, there were both brass and iron, and some silver. One came up at auction some years back and I stopped bidding at £600… They have shot up in value. Quote
John C Posted yesterday at 01:11 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:11 AM 5 hours ago, ROKUJURO said: SEN no RIKYU's famous bamboo HANAIRE Jean: Were they meant to hold water? The top of the pieces certainly look like a hanaire but these don't have bottoms and wouldn't hold water. John C. Quote
John C Posted yesterday at 01:13 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:13 AM Piers: I would love to have one but this is too rich for my blood. The bad pictures and use of the word "minty" to describe it gives me pause in any case. John C. 2 Quote
ROKUJURO Posted yesterday at 01:41 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:41 AM John, these HANAIRE were not meant to hold water. As far as I know from more recent pieces, a container was made/soldered from tin or copper to fit into it. You can stand them upright (then they don't even need a closed bottom) or hang them on a nail. Many years ago I got my hands on big bamboo and made one myself for IKEBANA. I always dreamt of having a TOKONOMA..... Piers, your HANAIRE is nice! Is that a Camellia flower in it? 2 Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted yesterday at 02:06 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 02:06 AM 21 minutes ago, ROKUJURO said: John, these HANAIRE were not meant to hold water. As far as I know from more recent pieces, a container was made/soldered from tin or copper to fit into it. You can stand them upright (then they don't even need a closed bottom) or hang them on a nail. Many years ago I got my hands on big bamboo and made one myself for IKEBANA. I always dreamt of having a TOKONOMA..... Piers, your HANAIRE is nice! Is that a Camellia flower in it? Correct, they usually have a small vase or container inside. Jean, I know camellia were considered unlucky by some, but we can do azaleas too! Oh, and create that tokonoma!!! 1 Quote
ROKUJURO Posted yesterday at 02:30 AM Report Posted yesterday at 02:30 AM Very beautiful! I'm also thinking of TSUBAKI SANJURO.... 1 Quote
John C Posted yesterday at 03:23 AM Report Posted yesterday at 03:23 AM Just heard back from the seller on the bone hanaire. He says it is indeed the shape of a hanaire but believes it is a netsuke representation due to its size (about 8cm long). John C. 1 Quote
Bugyotsuji Posted 14 hours ago Author Report Posted 14 hours ago Antler (also ivory, and to a lesser extent bone) was often fashioned to look like bamboo. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.