William Jennings Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 Hello all! I was hoping that someone could tell me about this sword I have the chance to buy. The seller says it’s it’s signed “Mitsunaga” and it’s from the 1300’s. What do you guys think? Is this accurate? Gimei signature? Quote
lonely panet Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 Did some idiot try and drill a new mekugi or its it just my eyes?? Quote
Grey Doffin Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 It is signed Mitsunga but probably not as old as advertised. I think beginners would be smart to buy only from trusted sellers. Grey 4 Quote
Tohagi Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 Same impression : no way this is from 13's. By the way I have a problem of scale ( and descence) on pictures: - is this sword à very little blade, or the dealer have giant foot ? - How come somone with a little commun sens will put à koto sword on dirty floor to take a picture? RUN! 1 Quote
Lewis B Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 5 hours ago, lonely panet said: Did some idiot try and drill a new mekugi or its it just my eyes?? Your eyes are 20/20. Someone tried to drill a hole on both side of the nakago, and quite recently. I would stay clear of this seller. 1 Quote
Schneeds Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 What was the point of placing it on a filthy cloth on top of a filthy rubber mat? I can't even get past that. 1 Quote
lonely panet Posted May 8 Report Posted May 8 clearly the guys to as experanced and knowledgeable as you erik, dont be to critical of simple mistakes Quote
Crossedpath68 Posted May 12 Report Posted May 12 On 5/8/2025 at 10:09 PM, Schneeds said: What was the point of placing it on a filthy cloth on top of a filthy rubber mat? I can't even get past that. Lemme clear some of this up for you…they’re my pics. I was asked for a photo of the blade from directly above. I was at work and this is outside my car. I would think a weather tech mat and a microfiber would be enough to protect the blade…you have to understand that we thought this was a karate prop. My brother broke the pin in the handle like 25 years ago…as for the weird (looks like drill marks) and the marks that look like a vice pattern on the blade, I have no idea about those. my dad asked if he could take this blade when it was going to be shipped off to be destroyed out of the evidence room in the 80’s…it has been in a Florida closet for 35 years or more…I was going to restore it for him (thinking it was an old karate prop)…after taking a look at it, I realized that the handle was made with some sort of animal skin (sting ray imo)…so I didn’t touch it further. The signed name on it is Mitsunaga and the general consensus is that it’s from ~1350 and was probably a longer weapon that was cut down to make this katana sized blade. The only things I have done to it were remove the silk wrapping so I could get to the signature…silk was all dry rotted and falling apart…the blade is still razor sharp. I would like to get it restored, but my dad is like “I would much rather you be up a grand or 2 than put 4k into a sword that you’ll just have or display somewhere. So I am currently trying to get it appraised correctly. I know the things that were done to it have hurt the value. All I am trying to do from this point on is preserve it correctly. So forgive me for thinking that my dads old karate prop that’s been hidden in the closet my whole life was a karate prop like the other karate props and not 1000 year old Japanese Nihonto. I didn’t mean to disrespect the blade or anyone in any way…it’s just, really? There’s going to be an ancient samurai sword in our closet and not a cheap karate prop? In south Florida? The chances of it being real were slim to none. That thought didn’t even cross my mind. And as someone who uses Japanese chef knives for a living, I don’t know why it didn’t til I saw the ray skin… 1 Quote
Crossedpath68 Posted May 12 Report Posted May 12 Next, someone is going to tell me that the Sai’s are legit and they too should be taken out of the basement that flooded this past summer… Quote
Rivkin Posted May 12 Report Posted May 12 Judging by nakago condition the earliest it can be is late Muromachi. The signature placement is not exactly Edo period's, but then the signature execution is sort of is. Sugata is not very specific, but its not likely to be an early one. 1 Quote
Tohagi Posted May 13 Report Posted May 13 ...no evidence of suriage for me, maybe little maki okuri ? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.