Jump to content

WW2 Japanese NLF sword


Swords

Recommended Posts

Hi Steven,

This was made (date upside down) March 1944.  Someone will have to help with the mei (maybe Masatomo? But I'm not good at mei).

 

On another note, this is not an NLF sword.  Never used by the navy.  It comes by many names, since for decades no one really knew what they were.  Nick Komiya found the documents and history of them, though, a couple years back.  They were a contingency model produced for the Army, designed to cost less but be more durable in the field.  Since there is no real name for them, they are now called Contingency Model, or Japanese version - Rinji seishiki.  Thomas calls them a Type 100 as they were officially announced in 1940.  You can read all about them:

 

Not a "Type 3"

 

and 

 

Unveiling the Rinjiseishiki in 1940

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to all for help with the mei

bruce Eric has one listed on EBay his is NLF 

or states NFL mounts So what’s the difference? To me there similar 

 

 

 

 

Steve

 

IMG_0247.jpeg

IMG_0248.jpeg

IMG_0249.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bruce I just read the entire article interesting not a type 3 Basically cheaper to make and more durable for war although the type 98 had to be worn for dress

Good info Bruce 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Swords said:

one listed on EBay his is NLF 

or states NFL mounts So what’s the difference?

This is quite common.  Mostly, I don't think many collectors, or sellers, know of the history.  Even when they do, I still see them use such terms most likely because there are certain names prospective buyers use to google search.  Type 44, Type 3, Late-war Army, NLF, Marine Landing Sword are the most common names used for this style, so sellers will put such names in the titles to draw in searches.

 

I know a seller that puts all sorts of names in his titles, even though I know he knows the names are inaccurate, like "WWII Japanese officer NCO shingunto sword", just to maximize the search engine results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/24/2024 at 8:12 AM, Swords said:

do you know the name of the seller?

I do,  We can talk via PM if necessary.  But he doesn't sell bad swords, He sells legit stuff.  I just don't care for the marketing technique.  It's promoted by ebay.  When you post something for sale, they recommend putting as many descriptive words in the title as possible to draw more views from searches.  And so, he does!  Lots of words that may or may not have anything to do with the actual sword being posted.  His item description is always accurate.  It's just the title that can be overly loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Swords said:

overly loose

Steve:

In that one particular auction from Eric you referenced above, he mentions the word "minty" 9 times in the description, though he is not selling mouthwash. He also uses the word "samurai" in the title when he knows perfectly well it was not and could not have been used by a samurai warrior. As Bruce noted above, sellers use words that attract unknowledgeable buyers to increase viewer traffic. So his use of NLF and other words are for marketing only. This is the "overly loose" use of words to attract buyers.

Hope this helps,

John C.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't that the type of Rinji Seikishi used on the RJT swords? The textured lacquered scabbard, "cup" shaped seppa, the lacquered ito and shape of the tsuka. It's definitely not the "run of the mill" "P-1944" which has the tan finished steel scabbard.

 

Those usually go for a lot more than the "P-1944" with the arsenal blades, though that's subject to the condition of the blade, as always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of information to chew on I think for me is best to read more books As I have bought 5 

Im not going to jump on another sword unless I know what I’m buying and price is right 

But thanks for everyone s comments I didn’t know it wasn’t considered a nlf so thanks for the clarification 


 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...