Ron M Posted July 22, 2022 Report Posted July 22, 2022 Greetings to you all, I believe this starts with: Noshu Seki Ju…. then I’m not sure. I understand if this is unreadable and thank you. Quote
SteveM Posted July 24, 2022 Report Posted July 24, 2022 濃州関住福本兼宗 Nōshū Seki-jū Fukumoto Kanemune 2 Quote
Peter Bleed Posted July 24, 2022 Report Posted July 24, 2022 Dude's name was Fukumoto Kanemune. He made swords during the War Peter 1 Quote
Peter Bleed Posted July 24, 2022 Report Posted July 24, 2022 See, I wasted a moment, getting out Slough's book and Steve beat me to the answer. Ahh, the joys of collecting in the modern era! P Quote
Brian Posted July 24, 2022 Report Posted July 24, 2022 Confirmation is never a bad thing. Plus you got some exercise Peter Quote
Peter Bleed Posted July 24, 2022 Report Posted July 24, 2022 Well, gee. I have spent more time on this signature than I ever have on similar swords. I am challenged by a "Seki" character. And thru it we get some insights into the Amahide thing and we have ALL seen lots of them. They don't get much respect today, but I bet in a century or two they will be considered worthy of study. In that light this sword may be worth documentation. Peter Quote
SteveM Posted July 24, 2022 Report Posted July 24, 2022 I was really surprised by the difference in the photograph of the characters on the tang versus the rubbing. The rubbing is so clear and legible, it looks as if its from a different sword. Actually, the rubbing is so clear that at first I thought it was a page from Slough's book. Quote
ROKUJURO Posted July 24, 2022 Report Posted July 24, 2022 Steve, in my old eyes, the rubbing is from a different sword. Anyhow, I absolutely admire your capabilities to read something from these bad photos! 3 1 Quote
Ron M Posted July 24, 2022 Author Report Posted July 24, 2022 2 hours ago, ROKUJURO said: Steve, in my old eyes, the rubbing is from a different sword. Anyhow, I absolutely admire your capabilities to read something from these bad photos! Thank you for the information. I didn’t think there was a fujiwara in it, maybe fukuta or fukumoto or something. The rubbing is from a different sword that I saw was similar though I didn’t see Kane as one of the kanji on this one though I surely don’t know anyway. This sword had an origami at one time. My father said the stamp had been removed and the blade papered, but before he owned it, as he bought it papered but the man never mailed them. I have seen a similar sword online and it also has papers, It’s a different smith though, Noshu Seki Ju Fukuta Yoshimune, and it appears to have a stamp removed also. My kind regards, now time to research. Quote
SteveM Posted July 24, 2022 Report Posted July 24, 2022 If you are talking about the one on Aoi's site, I'm certain he has mistranslated it, and it is in fact also Fukumoto Kanemune. https://www.aoijapan.com/katana-noshu-seki-ju-fukuta-yoshimune/ 1 Quote
Ron M Posted July 25, 2022 Author Report Posted July 25, 2022 1 hour ago, SteveM said: If you are talking about the one on Aoi's site, I'm certain he has mistranslated it, and it is in fact also Fukumoto Kanemune. https://www.aoijapan.com/katana-noshu-seki-ju-fukuta-yoshimune/ Yes. That is it. I noticed that the hamon is not really the same on both sides, as mine is not as well. so I believe that yea it is the same maker. thanks so much! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.