Jump to content

Koshirae Fitters Stamping Blades


Recommended Posts

This discussion could go on the Arsenal Stamps thread, since it's strayed considerably from the titled topic, but there are some collectors that are quite interested in koshirae, so I think it deserves it's own thread.

 

There are a number of blades that have alpha-numeric numbers stamped on the end of the nakago, and I've started this thread to document the practice, and where possible, identify the reasons for it.

 

Posts by Ray Singer and Chris (Vajo) on the "Show Us Your High Class Gunto" thread (http://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/18610-show-us-your-high-class-gunto/page-7) have revealed two gendaito made by two different smiths that are fitted with near identical, high-quality fittings, and both are stamped with numbers of similar style on the same location of the nakago. I've also recently come across a Mantetsu stamped in a similar way with a number that matches the numbers stamped on the tsuba and seppa. The fittings are high quality, though not the top-quality of Ray's and Chris' examples. The 3 indicate that the numbers on the blades were put there by the koshirae manufacturer/fitter and not by the smith.

 

Ray's:

post-3487-0-56491600-1558714812_thumb.jpg

 

Chris':

post-3487-0-33701600-1558714822_thumb.jpg

 

Mantetsu:

post-3487-0-80128700-1558714832_thumb.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should note that George Trotter has already identified a numbering practice on nakago by the Yamagami Brothers on this thread: http://www.militaria.co.za/nmb/topic/8546-survey-of-gunto-contract-numbers/?hl=%2Byamagami+%2Bbrothers

 

So, this thread isn't claiming that all numbers on nakago are done by fitters.

 

And of course, we all know of the Mantetsu practice.

 

If anyone else has examples of nakago stamped numbers matching koshirae, it would be good to document them here.

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have another one from Yamagami Akihisa. Stamped no. 618

Black lacquered ito and a different saya that looks like a type98 but the fittings are different to type98. The stamp is on the fittings too.

 

post-3496-0-12571800-1558718385_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good info guys.

Vajo san, I had a good look at the pics and can add a little info to your description. I already have this info, but your pics help a lot.

 

Signed AKIHISA in tachimei.with star stamp. Date side has "matsu in a circle" stamp in front of number 819 (not 618).

 

I know we have discussed these numbers before but it is known that the Yamagami brothers had plain numbers on their tang tips between Sho 16/7 - 16/12 (106-566)

They began using  the "matsu in a circle" number and star 17/2 - 18//10 (452 - 1377)

Started using a "kana" prefix in 19/3 (" i " 2353). This style has been seen on other star stamped RJT swords so seems to be an RJT numbering system?

 

To analyse, I think the plain number and matsu / number may be production output numbers of the brothers themselves, but as the production seems high, could be fittings mounter assembly numbers. The fittings mounters were also mounting swords for other smiths, so could be an explanation of why the numbers seem a bit high for blade production tally numbers.

 

Whether the matsu stamp belongs to the brothers or to a mounting shop I don't know for certain, but I will look through my WWII books and see if there was a mounting shop named "Matsu.something" around then.

 

As the kana prefix numbers are seen on other RJT blades these may be RJT controlled numbers for either production (by district) or again, for use by district mounting workshops.

BTW, very interesting fittings.

 

Keep up the good work,.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello George, thank you very much for your very interesting informations. You are right, the number is 819 (was mabye to late last evening). I put it to the description on the sword for my records, not to forget. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Attached is entry in 1942 book 'Dai Nihon Token Shoka Meikan' (book of swords/makers/fittings/polishers etc) page 141 which shows a bit about MATSUYAMA's GUNTO SEISAKIUJO which was in Tokyo city, Shiba Ku, Shinbashi 5 chome.  Matsuyama's was a Military Sword fittings shop/factory. 

 

This book advertisement shows their logo which is "yama" in a circle. Whether this is their mark on all things including swords they mounted, or whether, when they were mounting private swords or RJT swords, they stamped "matsu in a circle"  I can't say. Maybe our Japanese speakers have more information on the fittings shops of WWII in some of their own WWII sword books?

 

First pic shows the shop and text and logo. Second pic shows the matsu in a circle stamp on a Yamagami Munetoshi RJT sword dated Sho 18/5 in good quality Type 3 mounts.

 

BTW, as a matter of interest, both of my Munetoshi blades have "nagashi" polish lines on the machi portion of the shinogi area under the habaki (7 lines, and both have 6 lines on the kissaki mune area). These are the polisher's signature.

 

So, not sure if I am helping here or confusing things further.

Regards,

post-470-0-34580400-1558788186_thumb.jpeg

post-470-0-98662900-1558788275_thumb.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

George,

The Japaneseswordindex.com has the yama listed as:

 

 

"Gunto Sei Saku Jo

Located in Tokyo. The company was owned by Mr. Matsuyama. This firm made koshirae for both army and navy, as well as koshirae for police, diplomatic, and ceremonial uses."

 

It seems too coincidental that the Matsu and yama are both parts of the owner's name. I wonder if the brothers were on contract with Matsuyama's shop for those 2 years (or vice versa). Do you know if they were RJT smiths the whole time, or maybe just started in '43? (my memory fails me as to the original start of the official RJT operation).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Bruce,

if I remember correctly, both smiths were by sho 17/3 members of the North Japan Swordforging Assoc. vice-chaired by Kasama Shigetsugu. These members were 46 smiths who were spread from  the north of Tokyo up to Aomori Prefecture. These smiths sent or had their blades collected by the assoc. and taken to Tokyo where they were polished and mounted (maybe some were polished before sending to Tokyo - not sure). Finished swords were sold to the army for resale through the officer's clubs (I I have got it right - maybe the Assoc. had its own shop?).

 

From books, both Yamagami brothers were RJT and started making RJT contract swords from 1942 . I have seen:

Akihisa - star - 17/2 - #452  

Munetoshi - star - 17/11 - #422 using original "toshi" kanji

Munetoshi - star - 1711 - #matsu/443 using new "toshi" kanji

 

It may be only a small thing, but virtually every Yamagami Bros. blade I have seen has had the polisher's "nagashi" signature lines. Every Yamagami RJT or non-RJT blade I have had "in-hand" has been "polisher signed". This has to be qualified a little to add that all I have seen from non-RJT sword Akihisa 16/9  #308 to RJT sword Munetoshi 18/5  #matsu/1080 have the nagashi lines. After this date they seem not to have the lines - eg: Munetoshi RJT 19/3 ta2353 has no lines.

This may mean the Assoc. changed polishers or perhaps production pressures meant that they had to do "quicker" polishing?

 

So....regarding the matter of MATSU, as the blades were sent to Tokyo for polishing and mounting, maybe one of the contractors used by the Assoc. was Matsuyama? or some other contractor using the matsu stamp...be good to find out for sure (or are we just being WAY too nerdy?).

Regards,

 

Edit to add...has any member got a WWII gendaito still in original WWII polish that has the polisher's nagashi "signature"?...be interested to find out how common this is.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Searching through my RJT swords I could not find any polisher "signatures". I did find a tiny mune stamp "24" on a star stamped Endo Tomonari. July 1944. Any thoughts on who or why this is stamped?

 

Neil,

 

I've seen a couple of blades like this lately, and haven't a clue! Why would there be numbers if they don't have matching numbers on the koshirae? Mune stamps, up to now, have been predominantly inspector stamps - soooo, COULD be an inspector's number? But then I've recently seen a mune stamp that was the first kanji of the smith's name that made the blade, so ....

 

I've also seen a few blades with a single digit number (like "7") on the nakago end with no matching number on koshirae. So, more to this than a single answer I suspect.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neil,

 

I've seen a couple of blades like this lately, and haven't a clue! Why would there be numbers if they don't have matching numbers on the koshirae? Mune stamps, up to now, have been predominantly inspector stamps - soooo, COULD be an inspector's number? But then I've recently seen a mune stamp that was the first kanji of the smith's name that made the blade, so ....

 

I've also seen a few blades with a single digit number (like "7") on the nakago end with no matching number on koshirae. So, more to this than a single answer I suspect.

I have a RJT blade by 'Fushimi ju Takashima Kunihide'  of Kyoto (sho 19/8) that has this small number on the nakago mune. I haven't kept records, but can remember seeing it on the nakago mune of another Kunihide sho 19/8  (mine is 98 and the other is 99) and I've seen it on the nakago mune of an Okayama RJT smith (but can't remember his name). Now this one from Hyogo Prefecture. All four RJT swords were in Rinji Seishiki mounts and presumably were all mounted by an Army contractor who took swords from the mid-Japan area. I say this as the swords I've seen were all from the Osaka-Kyoto-Kobe-Okayama zone. My mune number is all there is...no numbers in paint or stamped into fittings...maybe smith tally number of RJT inspector's number or polisher's number...just don't know. All I can say is that the small size and mune placement is definitely from the Osaka/mid-Japan region.

Hope this helps

(looks like another research project for someone...(Bruce?) haha..

 

Edit to add:

there is a 2010 description of a RJT Endo Tomonari blade in Rinji Seishiki fittings dated sho 19/7 and numbered on the nakago mune '21'. you can find it under

'Late 1944' style Shin Gunto Help

so this is a second one for Tomonari of Hyogo Prefecture. This makes 5 RJT Osaka/mid-Japan RJT tangs with these small mune numbers. I can't help thinking we have a pattern here...RJT polishing contractor?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Update

 

 The sample is small, but this is what I have so far.  Stamped numbers appear to have begun in Dec 1941, both for the Yamagami brothers as well as all the rest, and ran through at least 1944 (no examples of numbered '45 blades).  The vast majority of the smiths are known RJT smiths, including the Yamagami Brothers.  But the Mantetsu blades push the issue away from the Army RJT program, toward the idea that a particular koshirae shop was doing it.  As we all know, only a very small number of Mantetsu blades have these stamps, and I imagine the same can be said for the listed smiths.

Except for kao (kokuin), things stamped at the end of nakago seem to be NOT part of the mei, nor tied to the blades' smith, but rather from another agency (Discussing this idea on this thread).  The Yamagami brothers' stamped numbers are unique with the Matsu stamp preceding the number.  But even their numbers changed from the Matsu to katakana characters オ and フ

in 1944, but we see the same kanji on the Kunishiro and Masakazu blades too, which points us back to an Army, or RJT, numbering system!!!

One proposal put forth concerning the Matsu stamp, is that it indicates that the official charcoal, dictated for nihonto by the RJT program, was being used, but after reviewing this list, it makes me wonder why the mark wasn't used on other RJT smith's too, if that were the explanation.

Open to thoughts, insights, ideas!

1941, Dec

Tomomaru (RJT)

535

tsuba

1942, Apr

Masakazu (RJT)

1129

tsuba/seppa “Ni”1129

1942, May

Riyuu (RJT)

1301

RS mounts

1942, Sep

Morinobu (RJT)

95

Star; tsuba/seppa

1942

Mantetsu Koa Isshin

138

W

1942

Mantetsu Koa Isshin

184

 

 

1942

Mantetsu Koa Isshin

234

W

1942

Mantetsu Koa Isshin

278

W

1943

Mantetsu Nan

63

 

 

1943

Mantetsu Nan

168

M

1943, Feb

Munimitsu

315

Star; RS mounts

1943, Apr

Akitaka (RJT)

1098

 

 

1943

Munetaka

490

 

 

1944, Feb

Kunishiro (RJT)

154

Star

1944, Jul

Tomonari

24 on mune

Star

1944, Oct

Masaharu

6 on mune

Star; RS mounts

ND

Masakazu (RJT)

37

Star

ND

Mumei

102

Stainless; seppa

ND

Hiratoshi

456

Stainless; Toyokawa

ND

Zoheito

354 (Kanji)

98 mount

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Updated Yamagami brothers chart

 

Matsu

1941, July

Munetoshi

106  (RS ana)

Trotter Survey

1941, Sep

Akihisa

249  Type 98

Trotter Survey

1941, Sep

Munetoshi

308  Type 98

Trotter Collection

1941, Dec

Akihisa

566  RS Model

Windy NMB

1941, Dec

Akihisa

577 RS

Trotter Survey

?

Akihisa

61 RS

Trotter Survey

?

Akihisa

97

NMB

1942, Feb

Akihisa

542 RS star

Trotter Survey

1942, Apr

Munetoshi

11 RS

Trotter Survey

1942, Nov

Munetoshi

422 ? star

Trotter Survey

1942, Nov

Munetoshi

433 RS star

Trotter Survey

1942, Oct

Munetoshi

451 RS

Davidequis NMB

1943, Jan

Munetoshi

508 Type 98 star

Trotter Survey

1943, Mar

Akihisa

618 RS star

Schmucker Collection

1943, Mar

Akihisa

819 RS star

Trotter Survey

1943, May

Munetoshi

1080 RS star

Trotter Collection

1943, May

Munetoshi

1082 RS star

baldi1942 NMB

1943, Oct

Akihisa

1377 RS star

Trotter Survey

1943, Nov

Munetoshi

443 RS star

? NMB

1944, Feb

Kunishiro

154, star

Trotter Survey

1944, Mar

Munetoshi

2353 Type 98 star

Trotter Survey

1942-1945 (ND)

Masakazu

37 RS star

IJASWORDS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
2 hours ago, Kiipu said:

You missed Katsumasa

Good one, Thomas!  Didn't have that one.  I have a Katsumasa - 168, No Date - but now I have 2!

 

I don't see Katsumasa on the RJT listing of the Japaneseswordindex.  But the massive majority of these numbered blades are RJT.  Does anyone have another source listing of RJT smiths?  If so, is he on it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, IJASWORDS said:

4 on one Kabutogane

I know we had a thread going where we were discussing, and comparing examples, of these stamped kabutogane, but I can't find it.

 

The single one on the second pic is the "" of the Tokyo 1st Army Arsenal inspectors.  The center star on the first pic is the emblem of the same Arsenal.  The image to the right of the star is definitely an unknown and can be seen better on this one:

20200306_205135.png.e7eb66f631ff78cea5913bfa9751e1a6.png

But I can't make out the one on the left of your star.  That's got to be a record for the most stamps on a kabutogane!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one, unless your post is really relevant and adds to the topic..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...