the_misha Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 Hello! I'm new to the forum, and I'm hoping someone here can help me to translate the mei on a sword I just inherited from my grandfather, who ostensibly brought it back from the Battle of the Philippines. I know almost nothing about this sword, other than it being a bring-back. The blade is in pretty rough shape, and the saya and tsuka are both absolutely wrecked, but being as it's a family heirloom of sorts, I'd like to get it restored to something resembling its original state. First, though, I'd need to know what that "original state" was. Thanks! - Colin Quote
Jean Posted June 29, 2015 Report Posted June 29, 2015 That's a WWII blade, signed Noshu Seki Ju Kane Tomo saku. http://www.japaneseswordindex.com/seki.htm Quote
the_misha Posted June 30, 2015 Author Report Posted June 30, 2015 Thanks, SwordGuyJoe and Jean!So, am I correct in guessing that what I've got here is your basic factory-produced "low grade Showato" as identified on the Seki Smiths page? - Colin Quote
SwordGuyJoe Posted June 30, 2015 Report Posted June 30, 2015 Yup. The Sho stamp indicates that it is non-traditionally made (showato) Quote
David Flynn Posted July 12, 2015 Report Posted July 12, 2015 Sho and Seki stamps don't necessarily mean they are made in a factory. They are arsenal stamps for non traditionally made Japanese swords. Both the NTHK yoshikawa group and the NTHK non profit group, have papered swords with these stamps. Some are low grade Showato and some are fully hand made with non Tamahagane. Quote
kissakai Posted July 12, 2015 Report Posted July 12, 2015 Hi I have a seki stamped katana and I've always understood this to be 100% non traditionally made Grev UK Quote
SwordGuyJoe Posted July 12, 2015 Report Posted July 12, 2015 There are three primary elements to consider when thinking traditional vs. non-traditional: - Steel used - The forging process - The quenching medium Traditional would mean using tamahagane, hammered by hand by sakite, and quenched in water. So while the question, "Is your sword traditionally made?" (If viewed as yes or no only), the answer would be 100% no. That said, some elements of the sword construction may follow 1 or more traditional methods. But at the end, it is a non-traditionally made sword. David - Perhaps it should be done in a separate thread, but I think we would all be interested in seeing stamped sword papers - other than a star stamp (which discussing that would be ). I have seen one a long time ago but when I discussed it here, I can't recall the consensus was fake papers or if people just went silent because it was outside of what anyone would expect. If memory serves (and it seldom does), it was NTHK but not sure of issuing branch. Quote
David Flynn Posted July 25, 2015 Report Posted July 25, 2015 One was issued at the Sydney Shinsa, by the Yoshikawa group. The other (if my memory serves me well) was issued at a Tampa Shinsa. There was something posted on this on this forum. Again ( if my memory serves me well) Chris Bowen acknowledged this. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.