J Reid Posted August 21, 2012 Report Posted August 21, 2012 Hey guys. So I just picked up this wakizashi. I was told it was mumei and in the dealer photos it looks mumei to me. Upon receiving it I noticed it actually had what looked like a signature. Its practically illegible in my opinion and obviously his too. But just out of curiosity, can anyone make sense of this. Even if you can tell me what kanji you see, I really want something more to go on.. Blade details: -59.9cm cutting edge -muromachi period -mino den -masame/itame hada -notare with nie -higaki yasurime -kaeri-fukashi boshi -fukura-tsuku kissaki -deep torii Any thoughts? Quote
J Reid Posted August 21, 2012 Author Report Posted August 21, 2012 sorry the html link didnt work... heres a direct link http://i1113.photobucket.com/albums/k51 ... 013081.jpg Best, J Reid Quote
bubba-san Posted August 21, 2012 Report Posted August 21, 2012 Yes there are some chisel marks ! heaven knows what it says . James Quote
J Reid Posted August 21, 2012 Author Report Posted August 21, 2012 Nagamitsu is a fair bet. Just by comparison... My eyes can't stop playing tricks now!! Bahh... Josh Quote
J Reid Posted August 21, 2012 Author Report Posted August 21, 2012 Just a guess, friend. It could also be bizen.. I have a feeling this may be a 2nd gen attribution. I will post pictures of the blade later this evening! Josh Quote
J Reid Posted August 21, 2012 Author Report Posted August 21, 2012 "Bizen Nagamitsu was the son of Bizen Mitsutada who was the founder of the Bizen Osafune School. Bizen Nagamitsu is thought to have begun production around the Bunei and Koan eras (1264-1287). There are some later works signed Sakon Shogen Nagamitsu from the Einin and Shoan eras (1293-1301). There is a school of thought that attributes swords with this signature to a second-generation smith Nagamitsu. I think that the predominate school of thought, however, is that there was only one generation." Josh Quote
Jean Posted August 22, 2012 Report Posted August 22, 2012 Josh, anybody interested in Nihonto knows Nagamitsu, we could say he is to Nihonto what Goya is to painting. This to say, fat chance to be the real Bizen Nagamitsu (100 of fakes), need pictures of the blade to say more. Quote
Jacques Posted August 22, 2012 Report Posted August 22, 2012 Hi, Based on what i see (i think it's a shinogi zukuri sword) it can't be this Nagamitsu. Quote
Jean Posted August 22, 2012 Report Posted August 22, 2012 Which Nagamitsu are you talking about Jacques, when you say "this Nagamitsu"? Here is a shinogi zukuri Nagamitsu: http://www.emuseum.jp/detail/100191/001 ... l¢ury= Quote
takakage Posted August 22, 2012 Report Posted August 22, 2012 Hi, If it is hagaki yasuri mei, it seems very hard to see a bizen smith........ Quote
Grey Doffin Posted August 22, 2012 Report Posted August 22, 2012 Highly unlikely that "this Nagamitsu" would have signed a katana mei. Grey Quote
Jacques Posted August 22, 2012 Report Posted August 22, 2012 Hi, Jean this Nagamitsu (ie son of Mitsutada) didn't sign katana mei. Quote
Jean Posted August 22, 2012 Report Posted August 22, 2012 I totally agree, I had already noticed it, since he is a Kamakura smith and famed for his tachi and not kodachi. So, it has nothing to do with you mentioning it is shinogi zukuri. Almost everything is given in the description given by Josh. The hada: itame/masame; hamon with nie, yasurime. Josh, When giving description of a blade and above all of nakago, you should precise: - suriage or not - number of mekugi ana. A glance at the Whole nakago would have told us if Bizen or not. This sword is most than probably an uchigatana Quote
Jacques Posted August 22, 2012 Report Posted August 22, 2012 Hi Yes Nagamitsu made mostly tachi but kodachi, tanto and naginata too. You were the first saying Nagamitsu, i should have to ask you which one Quote
J Reid Posted August 22, 2012 Author Report Posted August 22, 2012 Hey guys. So this topic has been busy since yesterday.. Okay so I know who Nagamitsu is and his profile in our world. I don't doubt that this is most likely gimei. I just figured it was exciting to find a relevant signature on a purchased "mumei" blade.. As for my original specs- I unfortunately didn't take time to thoroughly evaluate the aesthetics before I posted. I was just anxious for opinions on the mei alone and figured some specs were in order. But since it was 3 AM, I wouldn't say they're my best guess yet. At the time I wasn't up for some photography.. haha. I used john yumatos book for reference and that book is a good start, but lacking details, I find. After reading a couple more books my evaluation on the specs has of course changed. I did take some more pictures today though. Forgive my expert photography skills ( I used my Iphone ). URL: http://photobucket.com/nagamitsu Lets continue. Josh Quote
J Reid Posted August 22, 2012 Author Report Posted August 22, 2012 Jean, nakago is Ubu. 1 mekugi ana. My apologies.. Josh Quote
Jacques Posted August 22, 2012 Report Posted August 22, 2012 Hi, I don't doubt that this is most likely gimei. As the mei is unreadable, Nagamitsu is just a guess (and not a good one). Quote
J Reid Posted August 22, 2012 Author Report Posted August 22, 2012 Sorry, let me re word that.. " IF the Mei says "Nagamitsu" -it's most likely gimei." .. It almost definitely says NAGA (something) though.. Quote
Jean Posted August 22, 2012 Report Posted August 22, 2012 and not a good one Be my guest Jacques :D Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.